Cited by 37Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis: how can we deliver on the promise?

Open access
Mar, V.J., Soyer, H.P.·2018·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Currently, diagnostic accuracy for melanoma is dependent on the experience and training of the treating doctor. In this issue of the Annals of Oncology, Haenssle et al. [1] have shown that a computer algorithm using convolutional neural networks outperformed the majority of 58 dermatologists tested in accurately diagnosing melanoma, with a median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 compared with 0.79, P<0.01. This, together with the recent landmark work by Esteva et al.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdy193

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applications of DL techniques based on transfer learning have reported performance comparable to or better than that of human experts.

    “The applications of DL techniques based on transfer learning have reported performance comparable to that of the human experts 5 , , 6 or better 7 ., 8”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mar, V. J., & Soyer, H. P.
Affiliations
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Soyer, H.P.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1625-1628
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886533602
Cited by
37
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
melanoma diagnosis, artificial intelligence, convolutional neural networks, computer-aided diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, dermatologist comparison, skin cancer imaging
MeSH terms
Dermatologists, Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Male, Melanoma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review