Cited by 207Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Machine Learning and Data ClassificationSmart Agriculture and AI

Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanations

Open access
Schramowski, Patrick, Stammer, Wolfgang, Teso, Stefano, Brugger, Anna, Herbert, Franziska, Shao, Xiaoting, Luigs, Hans-Georg, Mahlein, Anne-Katrin +1 more·2020·Nature Machine Intelligence

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-020-0212-3

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [13][13] Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J. & Zisserman, A. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2007 (VOC2007) Results. http://www.pascalnetwork.org/challenges/VOC/voc2007/workshop/index.html. -
  2. [15][15] Herbert, F. P., Kersting, K. & J¨ akel, F. Why Should I Trust in AI? Master's thesis, Technical University Darmstadt (2019). -
  3. [19][19] Cakmak, M. et al. Mixed-initiative active learning. ICML 2011 Workshop on Combining Learning Strategies to Reduce Label Cost (2011). -
  4. [40][40] Roy, N. et al. Toward optimal active learning through monte carlo estimation of error reduction. ICML 441-448 (2001). -
  5. [41][41] Castro, R. M. et al. Upper and lower error bounds for active learning. In Proceedings of Conference on Communication, Control and Computing , 2.1, 1 (2006). -
  6. [43][43] Tong, S. & Koller, D. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Journal of machine learning research 2 , 45-66 (2001). -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schramowski, P., Stammer, W., Teso, S., Brugger, A., Herbert, F., Shao, X., Luigs, H.-G., Mahlein, A.-K., & Kersting, K.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Schramowski, Patrick
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2020-08-12
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
476-486
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035989815
Cited by
207
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 9
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Code Ocean
Funders
  • European Commission (694980)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC-2070, 390732324)
  • Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (2818204715)
  • Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
human-in-the-loop learning, model explanation, Clever Hans effect, confounding factors, plant phenotyping, deep neural network

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review