Cited by 594Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Brain Mechanisms of Vision

Hubel, David H., Wiesel, Torsten N.·1979·Scientific American

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/scientificamerican0979-150

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Scientific American
Published
1979-09
Volume
241
Issue
3
Pages
150-162
ISSN
0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053225842
Cited by
594
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientific American (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
visual perception, visual cortex, visual processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Axons, Axonal Transport, Humans, Neurons, Vision, Ocular, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review