Cited by 601Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEmpathy and Medical EducationCancer survivorship and care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease

Open access
Zachariae, R, Pedersen, C G, Jensen, A B, Ehrnrooth, E, Rossen, P B, von der Maase, H·2003·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the association of physician communication behaviours as perceived by the patient with patient reported satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease in cancer patients. Questionnaires measuring distress, self-efficacy, and perceived control were completed prior to and after the consultation by 454 patients attending an oncology outpatient clinic. After the consultation, the patients also rated the physicians' communicative behaviours by completing a patient-physician relationship inventory (PPRI), and the physicians were asked to estimate patient satisfaction. The overall results showed that higher PPRI scores of physician attentiveness and empathy were associated with greater patient satisfaction, increased self-efficacy, and reduced emotional distress following the consultation. In contrast, lower PPRI scores were associated with reduced ability of the physician to estimate patient satisfaction. The results confirm and expand previous findings, suggesting that communication is a core clinical skill in oncology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600798

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Personal contact: Mean percentage scores (s.d.) of patient satisfaction (A), the physicians' perception of patient satisfaction (B), and the physicians' satisfaction with his/her own ability to establish contact with the patient (C).
Figure 1 Personal contact: Mean percentage scores (s.d.) of patient satisfaction (A), the physicians' perception of patient satisfaction (B), and the physicians' satisfaction with his/her own ability to establish contact with the patient (C).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Medical aspects: Mean percentage scores (s.d.) of patient satisfaction (A), the physicians' perception of patient satisfaction (B), and the physicians' satisfaction with his/her own ability to handle the medical aspects of the patient's situation (C).
Figure 2 Medical aspects: Mean percentage scores (s.d.) of patient satisfaction (A), the physicians' perception of patient satisfaction (B), and the physicians' satisfaction with his/her own ability to handle the medical aspects of the patient's situation (C).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Mean percentage PPRI scores (s.d.) on the subscales of Attentiveness and Empathy and mean (s.d.) per cent rated importance of these skills.
Figure 3 Mean percentage PPRI scores (s.d.) on the subscales of Attentiveness and Empathy and mean (s.d.) per cent rated importance of these skills.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Mean percent scores (s.d.) of cancer-related self-efficacy, perceived control over disease, and mood prior to (1) and after the consultation (2).
Figure 4 Mean percent scores (s.d.) of cancer-related self-efficacy, perceived control over disease, and mood prior to (1) and after the consultation (2).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy – The Exercize of Control. New York: Freeman and Company
  2. Pedersen CG, Christensen S, Zachariae R, Bonde-Jensen A, Lehbrink M, Maase H (2001) Psychosocial and demographic predictors of pain, discomfort and satisfaction with the patient–physician relationship in a group of women attending a mammography clinic. Psycho-Oncology 10: S23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 598

Metadata

Authors
Zachariae, R., Pedersen, C. G., Jensen, A. B., Ehrnrooth, E., Rossen, P. B., & von der Maase, H.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Zachariae, R
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2003-03
Volume
88
Issue
5
Pages
658-665
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2058562152
Cited by
601
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 43
FWCI
17.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital
  • Kræftens Bekæmpelse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
patient satisfaction, emotional distress, perceived control, physician empathy, physician-patient relationship
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Physician-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Patient Satisfaction, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review