The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity in rural Mali: association and determinants
Abstract
Objective To examine the association between nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity, and to assess and compare the determinants for the two constructs in an adult population in rural Mali.Design Cross-sectional study assessing food intake by a validated 7-day quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Two different dietary diversity indexes were created: food variety score (FVS), a simple count of food items, and diet diversity score (DDS) a count of food groups. Mean adequacy ratio, the mean ratio of intake to recommended intake (each truncated at one) of energy and nine nutrients, was calculated as an indicator of nutrient adequacy. Information on household and individual characteristics, including demography, socioeconomic conditions and food production strategies was obtained using precoded questionnaires.Setting Bafoulabé district, Kayes region, Western Mali.Subjects In total, 502 subjects (55% women) aged 15-45 y from 319 different households.Results Both FVS and DDS had a positive correlation with mean adequacy ratio (MAR). Multivariate analysis (linear regression) showed that the most important factors explaining MAR was the number of milk products, vegetables and green leaves consumed, as well as sex and the number of crops produced in the household. Dietary diversity was associated with socioeconomic status, residence and age.Conclusion Dietary diversity is useful as an indicator of nutrient adequacy. It is important to examine how various food groups contribute to the nutrient adequacy of the diet in an area.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The average unadjusted correlation coefficient of .47 compared favorably with the range reported by similar validation studies comparing FFQ with food records: .34-.46 [31-32,34,41].”
From Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me Food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record (2014) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Previous studies comparing FFQ with food records have reported average exact agreement classifications between 34% and 49% [32,38,41] and exact agreement plus adjacent quartile classifications of 77% [21].”
From Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me Food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record (2014) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Similar studies have reported correlations ranging from .09 to .83 [37], .17 to .95 [36], and .09 to .58 [41] with mean values of .38, .63, and .58, respectively.”
From Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me Food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record (2014) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Bartko, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290246 · Cited by 4,834
Energy and protein requirements*
Pacey, A., & Payne, P. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429036279-4 · Cited by 2,545
Goldberg, G. R., Black, A., Jebb, S. A., Cole, T. J., Pr, M., Coward, W. A., & Prentice, A. M. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 1,927
Energy and protein requirements : report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation
Fao, J., Energy, U. E. C. O., & Requirements, P. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,857
Kennedy, E., Ohls, J. C., Carlson, S. J., & Fleming, K. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(95)00300-2 · Cited by 1,626
Human vitamin and mineral requirements
eng, N. D., Fao, J., Vitamin, W. E. C. O. H., Bangkok, M. R. E. S., & Who, G. E. (2002) · Cited by 993
Hatløy, A., Torheim, L. E., & Oshaug, A. (1998) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600662 · Cited by 556
Self-citationFao, J., Intake, W. E. C. O. E., & Requirements, S. P. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 524
DIETARY DIVERSITY AS A FOOD SECURITY INDICATOR
Hoddinott, J. F., & Yohannes, Y. (2002) · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.16474 · Cited by 454
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Oshaug A, Diarra M, Torheim LE, Diallo F, Diakité M, Sissoko F, Hatløy A & Ouattara F (1997): Etude qualitative des besoins de la population à Bafoulabé. Programme de collaboration PIDEB/INRSP/Université d’Oslo. Oslo: Institute of Nutrition Research, University of Oslo.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arimond, M., Wiesmann, D., Becquey, E., Carriquiry, A., Daniels, M. C., Deitchler, M., Fanou-Fogny, N., Joseph, M. L., Kennedy, G., Martin-Prevel, Y., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.110.123414 · Cited by 614
Self-citationJones, A. D., Shrinivas, A., & Bezner-Kerr, R. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.001 · Cited by 596
Sharrock, S. L. (2016) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 466
Mayén, A., Marques-Vidal, P. M., Paccaud, F. M., Bovet, P., & Stringhini, S. (2014) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.089029 · Cited by 412
Improving diets with wild and cultivated biodiversity from across the landscape
Powell, B., Thilsted, S. H., Ickowitz, A., Termote, C., Sunderland, T., & Herforth, A. (2015) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-015-0466-5 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Torheim, L. E., Ouattara, F., Diarra, M. M., Thiam, F. D., Barikmo, I., Hatløy, A., & Oshaug, A.
- Affiliations
- OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
- Institut National de Recherche en Santé Publique (ML)
- Ministère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique (ML)
- University of Bamako (ML)
- Fafo Foundation (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Torheim, L E
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 2004-03-25
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 594-604
- ISSN
- 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5640
- OpenAlex
- W2078112771
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- nutritional adequacy, dietary diversity, mean adequacy ratio, rural Mali, household food production, dairy products, vegetable consumption, socioeconomic status, food security
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Diet Surveys, Female, Humans, Male, Mali, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Rural Population
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review