Cited by 163Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseHeat shock proteins researchCell death mechanisms and regulation

An RNA‐dependent protein kinase is involved in tunicamycin‐induced apoptosis and Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Onuki, Reiko, Bando, Yoshio, Suyama, Eigo, Katayama, Taiichi, Kawasaki, Hiroaki, Baba, Tadashi, Tohyama, Masaya, Taira, Kazunari·2004·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Various types of stress, such as disruption of calcium homeostasis, inhibition of protein glycosylation and reduction of disulfide bonds, result in accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The initial cellular response involves removal of such proteins by the ER, but excessive and/or long-term stress results in apoptosis. In this study, we used a randomized ribozyme library and ER stress-mediated apoptosis (tunicamycin-induced apoptosis) in SK-N-SH human neuroblastoma cells as a selective phenotype to identify factors involved in this process. We identified a double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) as one of the participants in this process. The level of nuclear PKR was elevated, but the level of cytoplasmic PKR barely changed in tunicamycin-treated SK-N-SH cells. Furthermore, tunicamycin also raised levels of phosphorylated PKR in the nucleus. We also detected the accumulation of phosphorylated PKR in the nuclei of autopsied brain tissues in Alzheimer's disease. Thus, PKR might play a role in ER stress-induced apoptosis and in Alzheimer's disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600049

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phosphorylation of PKR and eIF2α is associated with degenerating neurons in AD brains.

    “previous reports revealed that phosphorylation of PKR and eIF2α was associated with degenerating neurons in AD brains [50, 95, 96].”

    From PKR, the double stranded RNA‐dependent protein kinase as a critical target in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

    The section “Levels of nuclear PKR in AD brain tissue” reports elevated phosphorylated PKR in AD brain tissue and suggests an association with AD pathology in neurons. The paper mentions eIF2α phosphorylation as a pathway involving PKR, but does not report phosphorylated eIF2α in AD brains. Its Discussion also notes that neurons with aggregated PKR had not apparently undergone apoptosis, so the evidence does not directly establish an association with degenerating neurons. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The up-regulation of PKR in mononuclear cells does not lead to the cell death observed in cellular models exposed to Aβ, in AD transgenic mice and in brains of AD patients.

    “Paradoxically, the up-regulation of PKR in mononuclear cells do not lead to the cell death observed in cellular models exposed to Ap, in AD transgenic mice and in brains of AD patients [50, 95, 97].”

    From PKR, the double stranded RNA‐dependent protein kinase as a critical target in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Introduction and ‘Levels of nuclear PKR in AD brain tissue’ report elevated PKR in AD brains and suggest a relationship with neuronal cell death. But the Discussion says that many AD-brain cells with PKR aggregates had not apparently undergone apoptosis. This paper does not examine mononuclear cells or AD transgenic mice, and its PKR-related cell-death experiments used tunicamycin rather than Aβ. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The control of translation through the PKR/eIF2a signalling pathway is altered in AD lymphocytes as it was observed in brains of AD patients.

    “The control of translation through PKR/eIF2a signalling pathway is altered in AD lymphocytes as it was observed in brains of AD patients [50, 95].”

    From PKR, the double stranded RNA‐dependent protein kinase as a critical target in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

    The ‘Levels of nuclear PKR in AD brain tissue’ section (p. 963) reports significantly higher phosphorylated PKR in AD brains than in controls. The Introduction explains that PKR can act through eIF2α to block protein synthesis, but the paper does not show altered eIF2α signalling or translation in AD brains; it also does not study AD lymphocytes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In brains of AD patients, Pt451-PKR was localized in nuclei and around amyloid deposits.

    “In brains of AD patients, Pt451-PKR was also localized in nuclei and around amyloid deposits but the Braak score was not indicated in papers [50, 95].”

    From PKR, the double stranded RNA‐dependent protein kinase as a critical target in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

    The ‘Levels of nuclear PKR in AD brain tissue’ section (page not available) reports nuclear PKR aggregates and elevated phosphorylated PKR in AD brains. It does not report localization around amyloid deposits or establish that the localized protein was phosphorylated specifically at Thr451; the paper identifies its anti-phospho-PKR antibody as recognizing Thr446. No Braak score is given in the passages examined. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kawasaki H, Wadhwa R, Taira K (2004) World of small RNAs: from ribozymes to siRNA and miRNA. Differentiation, in press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Onuki, R., Bando, Y., Suyama, E., Katayama, T., Kawasaki, H., Baba, T., Tohyama, M., & Taira, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation (US)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
  • National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Taira, Kazunari
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2004-02-05
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
959-968
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2149830662
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
  • University of Tsukuba
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR, endoplasmic reticulum stress, Alzheimer's disease, misfolded protein accumulation, SK-N-SH cells, brain tissue
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cell Nucleus, Cytoplasm, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Humans, Phosphorylation, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Tunicamycin, Signal Transduction, RNA, Catalytic, Apoptosis, eIF-2 Kinase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review