The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interventions to prevent weight gain: a systematic review of psychological models and behaviour change methods
Abstract
Objective To identify and review published interventions aimed at the prevention of weight gain.Design A systematic review of published interventions aimed at the prevention of weight gain.Methods Search strategies-we searched eight databases, manually checked reference lists and contacted authors. Inclusion and exclusion criteria-studies of any design, in which participants were selected regardless of weight or age, were included. Interventions targeting a specific subgroup, multifactorial interventions, interventions aimed at weight loss, and those with an ambiguous aim were excluded. Data extraction-data were extracted on behaviours targeted for change, psychological model, behaviour change methods and modes of delivery, methodological quality, characteristics of participants, and outcomes related to body weight and self-reported diet and physical activity. Classification and validation-a taxonomy of behaviour change programmes was developed and used for classification of underlying model, behaviour change methods, and modes of delivery. The data extraction and subsequent classification were independently validated.Results Eleven publications were included, describing five distinct interventions in schools and four in the wider community. Where diet and physical activity were described, positive effects were usually obtained, but all were measured by self-report. Effects on weight were mixed but follow-up was generally short. Smaller effects on weight gain were found among low-income participants, students and smokers. Many participants in the community-based studies were overweight or obese. Study dropout was higher among thinner and lower-income subjects.Conclusion Interventions to prevent weight gain exhibited various degrees of effectiveness. Definite statements about the elements of the interventions that were associated with increased effect size cannot be made as only one of the five studies that involved an RCT design reported a significant effect on weight. This intervention involved a correspondence programme and a mix of behaviour change methods including goal setting, self-monitoring and contingencies. Future interventions might be more effective if they were explicitly based on methods of behaviour change that have been shown to work in other contexts. Effective interventions would be more easily replicated if they were explicitly described. Effectiveness might be more precisely demonstrated if more objective measures of physical activity and diet were used, and if the follow-up was over a longer period. International Journal of Obesity (2000) 24, 131-143
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Abraham and Michie 20 developed the first cross-behaviour BCT taxonomy, building on previous intervention content analyses.18,19”
Citations
Cites
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Pierce, W. D., & Bandura, A. (1977) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340496 · Cited by 9,742
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,453
Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General
(1995) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e525162010-001 · Cited by 5,488
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
Twaddle, S., & Qureshi, S. (2005) · Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.09.008 · Cited by 4,080
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480
Must, A., Dallal, G., & Dietz, W. (1991) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/53.4.839 · Cited by 1,343
Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.186 · Cited by 1,343
Obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth?
Prentice, A. M., & Jebb, S. A. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7002.437 · Cited by 1,163
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Lissner L, Barker DJP, Blundell JE, Dietz WH, Epstein LH, Jeffery RW et al.What are the bio-behavioural determinants of body weight regulation? In: Bouchard C, Bray GA (eds) Regulation of bodyweight. Biological and behavioural mechanisms. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester 1996 159–177.
- Beutler EB, Cambell EP, Frincke LA, Hannon DP, Heim S, Kenney NB, Schneider KE, Smith BS, Vaucher B . Reference Manager Version 7.00N. Carlsbad: CA, USA, 1995.
- Bootzin R . Behaviour modification and therapy: An introduction. Winthrop: Cambridge, Mas 1975.
- Cairella G, Romagnoli F, Cantarelli P, Valentini P, Tarsitani G . School oriented intervention on dietary education: Results of phase 1 Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998 22 (Suppl): S254 (abstract).
- Health Promotion Effectiveness Reviews . Health promotion interventions to promote healthy eating in the general population: A review. Health Education Authority: London 1997.
- Health Promotion Effectiveness Reviews . Effectiveness of physical activity promotion in primary care. Health Education Authority: London 1998.
- Medical Research Council . Primary Health Care 1997. MRC Topic Review. Medical Research Council: London 1997.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · Cited by 7,629
Self-citationWebb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 · Cited by 3,732
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach
Michie, S. (2005) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 · Cited by 3,440
A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions
Abraham, C., & Michie, S. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379 · Cited by 2,525
Webb, T. L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1376 · Cited by 2,517
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardeman, W., Griffin, S., Johnston, M., Kinmonth, A., & Wareham, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hardeman, W
- Venue
- International Journal of Obesity
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-143
- ISSN
- 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5497
- OpenAlex
- W2058494271
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
- Keywords
- weight gain prevention, behaviour change interventions, psychological model, self-monitoring, goal setting, contingency management, school-based intervention, community-based intervention, diet, physical activity, obesity, intervention effectiveness, dropout
- MeSH terms
- Behavior Therapy, Humans, Models, Psychological, Obesity, Weight Gain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review