Cited by 110Hair Growth and DisordersSkin and Cellular Biology Researchdental development and anomalies

Hair follicle regeneration using grafted rodent and human cells

Open access
Ehama, Ritsuko, Ishimatsu-Tsuji, Yumiko, Iriyama, Shunsuke, Ideta, Ritsuro, Soma, Tsutomu, Yano, Kiichiro, Kawasaki, Chikako, Suzuki, Satoshi +3 more·2007·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

Hair follicle regeneration involves epithelial-mesenchymal interactions (EMIs) of follicular epithelial and dermal papilla (DP) cells. Co-grafting of those cellular components from mice allows complete hair reconstitution. However, regeneration of human hair in a similar manner has not been reported. Here, we investigated the possibility of cell-based hair generation from human cells. We found that DP-enriched cells (DPE) are more critical than epidermal cells in murine hair reconstitution on a cell number basis, and that murine DPE are also competent for hair regeneration with rat epidermal cells. Co-grafting of human keratinocytes derived from neonatal foreskins with murine DPE produced hair follicle-like structures consisting of multiple epidermal cell layers with a well-keratinized innermost region. Those structures expressed hair follicle-specific markers including hair keratin, and markers expressed during developmental stages. However, the lack of regular hair structures indicates abnormal folliculogenesis. Similar hair follicle-like structures were also generated with cultured human keratinocytes after the first passage, or with keratinocytes derived from adult foreskins, demonstrating that epidermal cells even at a mature stage can differentiate in response to inductive signals from DP cells. This study emphasizes the importance of EMI in follicular generation and the differentiation potential of epidermal keratinocytes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.jid.5700823

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date, investigation into generating skin in vitro has focused on inducing pure populations of skin cell types from mouse and human PSCs.

    “To date, investigation into generating skin in vitro have focused on inducing pure populations of skin cell types—e.g. dermal fibroblasts or keratinocytes—from mouse and human PSCs (Coraux et al., 2003; Ehama et al., 2007; Guenou et al., 2009; Itoh et al., 2013; 2011; Mavilio et al., 2006).”

    From Hair Follicle Development in Mouse Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Skin Organoids (2018) · cites this paper as Ehama et al., 2007

    The Human keratinocyte culture section says the keratinocytes were isolated from neonatal or adult foreskins, not induced from pluripotent stem cells. The Introduction and Discussion describe combining human epidermal cells with murine dermal papilla cells by grafting to generate hair follicle-like structures, rather than generating skin in vitro from PSC-derived cell populations. Our copy provides no page numbers for these sections. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kamimura J, Lee D, Baden HP, Brissette J, Dotto GP (1997) Primary mouse keratinocyte cultures contain hair follicle progenitor cells with multiple differentiation potential (published erratum appears in J Invest Dermatol 1998 110(1):102). J Invest Dermatol 109:534-40 2114 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2007), Volume 127

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehama, R., Ishimatsu-Tsuji, Y., Iriyama, S., Ideta, R., Soma, T., Yano, K., Kawasaki, C., Suzuki, S., Shirakata, Y., Hashimoto, K., & Kishimoto, J.
Affiliations
  • Shiseido Group (Japan) (JP)
  • Ehime University Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Kishimoto, Jiro
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
127
Issue
9
Pages
2106-2115
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038128569
Cited by
110
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
Keywords
hair follicle regeneration, dermal papilla cells, epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, co-grafting, human keratinocytes, folliculogenesis, hair keratin, epidermal cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Epidermis, Epithelial Cells, Epithelium, Humans, Keratins, Mesoderm, Mice, Inbred ICR, Mice, Nude, Mice, Transgenic, Regeneration, Keratinocytes, Hair Follicle, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review