Cited by 94Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Fragile X: translation in action

Open access
Bear, Mark F, Dölen, Gül, Osterweil, Emily, Nagarajan, Naveen·2008·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Fragile X is a synapsopathy--a disorder of synaptic function and plasticity. Recent studies using mouse models of the disease suggest that the critical defect is altered regulation of synaptic protein synthesis. Various strategies to restore balanced synaptic protein synthesis have been remarkably successful in correcting widely varied mutant phenotypes in mice. Insights gained by the study of synaptic plasticity in animal models of fragile X have suggested novel therapeutic approaches, not only for human fragile X but also for autism and mental retardation of unknown etiology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1301610

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research into the pathogenesis of ASD has largely focused on understanding unifying biochemical mechanisms based on the hypothesis that ASD is a 'synaptopathy'.

    “For more than a decade, research into the pathogenesis of ASD has largely focused on understanding unifying biochemical mechanisms based on the hypothesis that ASD is a ‘synaptopathy’ (Bear et al., 2008; Dölen and Bear, 2009; Grabrucker et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kelleher RJ, Bear MF (2007). The autistic neuron. Cell (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bear, M. F., Dölen, G., Osterweil, E., & Nagarajan, N.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Bear, Mark F
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2007-10-17
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
84-87
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2130745215
Cited by
94
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • FRAXA Research Foundation
  • Simons Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F30MH067431)
  • National Eye Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, synaptic plasticity, synaptic protein synthesis, mouse model, treatment options, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, translational research
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review