Cited by 189Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysHeat shock proteins researchCell death mechanisms and regulation

Comparative study of the p53-mdm2 and p53-MDMX interfaces

Böttger, Volker, Böttger, Angelika, Garcia-Echeverria, Carlos, Ramos, Yolande FM, van der Eb, Alex J, Jochemsen, Aart G, Lane, David P·1999·Oncogene

Abstract

Mdm2 and MDMX are two structurally related p53-binding proteins which show the highest level of sequence similarity in the N-terminal p53-binding domains. Apart from its ability to inhibit p53 mediated transcription, a feature it shares with mdm2, very little is known about the physiological functions of MDMX. It is clearly distinct from mdm2 since its expression appears not to be regulated by p53 and it cannot compensate for lack of mdm2 in early development. We present data on the structural similarity between the p53 binding pockets of mdm2 and MDMX using p53- and phage-selected peptides. From the results we conclude that our recently devised innovative approach to reverse the mdm2-mediated inhibition of p53's transactivation function in vivo would probably target MDMX as well. Strategies for selectively targeting mdm2 and MDMX are suggested and a possible mechanism for regulating the p53-mdm2/MDMX interactions by protein phosphorylation is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1202281

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • S15 and S20 phosphorylation do not prevent MDM2 binding in vitro.

    “However, biochemical analysis using phosphorylated p53 peptide indicated that S15 and S20 phosphorylation do not prevent MDM2 binding in vitro (Bottger et al, 1999).”

    From ATM activates p53 by regulating MDM2 oligomerization and E3 processivity (2009) · cites this paper as Bottger et al, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Böttger, V., Böttger, A., Garcia-Echeverria, C., Ramos, Y. F., van der Eb, A. J., Jochemsen, A. G., & Lane, D. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Oncogene
Published
1999-01-07
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
189-199
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2332575792
Cited by
189
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
p53, MDM2, MDMX, p53-binding domain, protein-protein interaction, protein phosphorylation, tumor suppressor regulation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, Peptides, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Solubility, Gene Expression, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review