Cited by 101Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

PEDLA: predicting enhancers with a deep learning-based algorithmic framework

Open access
Liu, Feng, Li, Hao, Ren, Chao, Bo, Xiaochen, Shu, Wenjie·2016·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Transcriptional enhancers are non-coding segments of DNA that play a central role in the spatiotemporal regulation of gene expression programs. However, systematically and precisely predicting enhancers remain a major challenge. Although existing methods have achieved some success in enhancer prediction, they still suffer from many issues. We developed a deep learning-based algorithmic framework named PEDLA ( https://github.com/wenjiegroup/PEDLA ), which can directly learn an enhancer predictor from massively heterogeneous data and generalize in ways that are mostly consistent across various cell types/tissues. We first trained PEDLA with 1,114-dimensional heterogeneous features in H1 cells, and demonstrated that PEDLA framework integrates diverse heterogeneous features and gives state-of-the-art performance relative to five existing methods for enhancer prediction. We further extended PEDLA to iteratively learn from 22 training cell types/tissues. Our results showed that PEDLA manifested superior performance consistency in both training and independent test sets. On average, PEDLA achieved 95.0% accuracy and a 96.8% geometric mean (GM) of sensitivity and specificity across 22 training cell types/tissues, as well as 95.7% accuracy and a 96.8% GM across 20 independent test cell types/tissues. Together, our work illustrates the power of harnessing state-of-the-art deep learning techniques to consistently identify regulatory elements at a genome-wide scale from massively heterogeneous data across diverse cell types/tissues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep28517

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Massively parallel reporter assays coupled with machine learning have proven useful in addressing similar voids by producing quantitative biological insight that would be difficult to achieve through traditional approaches.

    “Massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) – methods that assess thousands to millions of sequence variants in a single experiment – coupled with machine learning have proven useful in addressing similar voids by producing quantitative biological insight that would be difficult to achieve through traditional approaches3–9.”

    From Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay (2019) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Abstract reports that PEDLA uses deep learning and heterogeneous genomic data to improve enhancer prediction, supporting the general point that machine learning can yield useful biological insight. But the paper does not report coupling machine learning with massively parallel reporter assays; its Materials and Methods describe other data types and validation using enhancer markers. The MPRA-specific part of the attributed claim is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Bulger M. & Groudine M. Enhancers: the abundance and function of regulatory sequences beyond promoters. Dev Biol 339, 250– 257 (2010). 20025863 PMC3060611
  2. Ong C. T. & Corces V. G. Enhancer function: new insights into the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 12, 283– 293 (2011). 21358745 PMC3175006
  3. Calo E. & Wysocka J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol Cell 49, 825– 837 (2013). 23473601 PMC3857148
  4. Bulger M. & Groudine M. Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers. Cell 144, 327– 339 (2011). 21295696 PMC3742076
  5. Bonn S.. Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development. Nat Genet 44, 148– 156 (2012). 22231485
  6. Levine M. Transcriptional enhancers in animal development and evolution. Curr Biol 20, R754– 763 (2010). 20833320 PMC4280268
  7. Whyte W. A.. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307– 319 (2013). 23582322 PMC3653129
  8. Jin F., Li Y., Ren B. & Natarajan R. PU.1 and C/EBP(alpha) synergistically program distinct response to NF-kappaB activation through establishing monocyte specific enhancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 5290– 5295 (2011). 21402921 PMC3069155
  9. Sexton T. & Cavalli G. The role of chromosome domains in shaping the functional genome. Cell 160, 1049– 1059 (2015). 25768903
  10. He B., Chen C., Teng L. & Tan K. Global view of enhancer-promoter interactome in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, E2191– 2199 (2014). 24821768 PMC4040567
  11. Jin F.. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503, 290– 294 (2013). 24141950 PMC3838900
  12. Prabhakar S.. Close sequence comparisons are sufficient to identify human cis-regulatory elements. Genome Res 16, 855– 863 (2006). 16769978 PMC1484452
  13. Pennacchio L. A.. In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences. Nature 444, 499– 502 (2006). 17086198
  14. Visel A.. Ultraconservation identifies a small subset of extremely constrained developmental enhancers. Nat Genet 40, 158– 160 (2008). 18176564 PMC2647775
  15. Visel A.. ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854– 858 (2009). 19212405 PMC2745234
  16. Nobrega M. A., Ovcharenko I., Afzal V. & Rubin E. M. Scanning human gene deserts for long-range enhancers. Science 302, 413 (2003). 14563999
  17. Visel A., Rubin E. M. & Pennacchio L. A. Genomic views of distant-acting enhancers. Nature 461, 199– 205 (2009). 19741700 PMC2923221
  18. Loots G. G.. Identification of a coordinate regulator of interleukins 4, 13 and 5 by cross-species sequence comparisons. Science 288, 136– 140 (2000). 10753117
  19. Cheng C.. Understanding transcriptional regulation by integrative analysis of transcription factor binding data. Genome Res 22, 1658– 1667 (2012). 22955978 PMC3431483
  20. He A., Kong S. W., Ma Q. & Pu W. T. Co-occupancy by multiple cardiac transcription factors identifies transcriptional enhancers active in heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 5632– 5637 (2011). 21415370 PMC3078411
  21. Chen X.. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106– 1117 (2008). 18555785
  22. Heintzman N. D. & Ren B. Finding distal regulatory elements in the human genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19, 541– 549 (2009). 19854636 PMC3321269
  23. May D.. Large-scale discovery of enhancers from human heart tissue. Nat Genet 44, 89– 93 (2012). 22138689 PMC3246570
  24. Ghisletti S.. Identification and characterization of enhancers controlling the inflammatory gene expression program in macrophages. Immunity 32, 317– 328 (2010). 20206554
  25. Blow M. J.. ChIP-Seq identification of weakly conserved heart enhancers. Nat Genet 42, 806– 810 (2010). 20729851 PMC3138496
  26. Boyle A. P.. High-resolution genome-wide in vivo footprinting of diverse transcription factors in human cells. Genome Res 21, 456– 464 (2011). 21106903 PMC3044859
  27. Crawford G. E.. Genome-wide mapping of DNase hypersensitive sites using massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). Genome Res 16, 123– 131 (2006). 16344561 PMC1356136
  28. Boyle A. P.. High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132, 311– 322 (2008). 18243105 PMC2669738
  29. Barski A.. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823– 837 (2007). 17512414
  30. Won K. J., Chepelev I., Ren B. & Wang W. Prediction of regulatory elements in mammalian genomes using chromatin signatures. BMC bioinformatics 9, 547 (2008). 19094206 PMC2657164
  31. Firpi H. A., Ucar D. & Tan K. Discover regulatory DNA elements using chromatin signatures and artificial neural network. Bioinformatics 26, 1579– 1586 (2010). 20453004 PMC2887052
  32. Rajagopal N.. RFECS: a random-forest based algorithm for enhancer identification from chromatin state. PLoS Comput Biol 9, e1002968 (2013). 23526891 PMC3597546
  33. Lu Y., Qu W., Shan G. & Zhang C. DELTA: A Distal Enhancer Locating Tool Based on AdaBoost Algorithm and Shape Features of Chromatin Modifications. PloS One 10, e0130622 (2015). 26091399 PMC4474808
  34. Fernandez M. & Miranda-Saavedra D. Genome-wide enhancer prediction from epigenetic signatures using genetic algorithm-optimized support vector machines. Nucleic Acids Res 40, e77 (2012). 22328731 PMC3378905
  35. Erwin G. D.. Integrating diverse datasets improves developmental enhancer prediction. PLoS Comput Biol 10, e1003677 (2014). 24967590 PMC4072507
  36. Kleftogiannis D., Kalnis P. & Bajic V. B. DEEP: a general computational framework for predicting enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res 43, e6 (2015). 25378307 PMC4288148
  37. Ernst J. & Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods 9, 215– 216 (2012). 22373907 PMC3577932
  38. Hoffman M. M.. Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation. Nat Methods 9, 473– 476 (2012). 22426492 PMC3340533
  39. ENCODE Project Consortium An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57– 74 (2012). 22955616 PMC3439153
  40. Batuwita R. & Palade V. Imbalanced Learning: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications. (eds He H. & Ma Y.) 83– 99 (Wiley-IEEE, 2013).
  41. Harrow J.. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res 22, 1760– 1774 (2012). 22955987 PMC3431492
  42. Bajic V. B. Comparing the success of different prediction software in sequence analysis: a review. Brief Bioinform 1, 214– 228 (2000). 11465033
  43. Zhang Y.. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9, R137 (2008). 18798982 PMC2592715
  44. Liu F.. De novo identification of replication-timing domains in the human genome by deep learning. Bioinformatics 32, 641– 649 (2016). 26545821 PMC4795613
  45. Gorkin D. U., Leung D. & Ren B. The 3D genome in transcriptional regulation and pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 14, 762– 775 (2014). 24905166 PMC4107214
  46. Smallwood A. & Ren B. Genome organization and long-range regulation of gene expression by enhancers. Curr Opin Cell Biol 25, 387– 394 (2013). 23465541 PMC4180870
  47. Lu Y., Zhou Y. & Tian W. Combining Hi-C data with phylogenetic correlation to predict the target genes of distal regulatory elements in human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 41, 10391– 10402 (2013). 24003029 PMC3905853
  48. LeCun Y., Bengio Y. & Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436– 444 (2015). 26017442
  49. Goldman M.. The UCSC cancer genomics browser: update 2015. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D812– 817 (2015). 25392408 PMC4383911
  50. Grant C. E., Bailey T. L. & Noble W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017– 1018 (2011). 21330290 PMC3065696
  51. Matys V.. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 34, D108– 110 (2006). 16381825 PMC1347505
  52. Mathelier A.. JASPAR 2016: a major expansion and update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D110– D115 (2015). 26531826 PMC4702842
  53. Hume M. A., Barrera L. A., Gisselbrecht S. S. & Bulyk M. L. UniPROBE, update 2015: new tools and content for the online database of protein-binding microarray data on protein-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D117– 122 (2015). 25378322 PMC4383892
  54. Hawkins R. D.. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 479– 491 (2010). 20452322 PMC2867844
  55. Natoli G. & Andrau J. C. Noncoding transcription at enhancers: general principles and functional models. Annu Rev Genet 46, 1– 19 (2012). 22905871
  56. Zhu Y.. Predicting enhancer transcription and activity from chromatin modifications. Nucleic Acids Res 41, 10032– 10043 (2013). 24038352 PMC3905895
  57. Creyghton M. P.. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 21931– 21936 (2010). 21106759 PMC3003124

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, F., Li, H., Ren, C., Bo, X., & Shu, W.
Affiliations
Beijing Radiation Center (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Bo, Xiaochen
  • Shu, Wenjie
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-06-22
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
28517-28517
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950980382
Cited by
101
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1435222, 2014DFB30020, 2015AA020108)
  • Major Research Plan (U1435222)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
enhancer prediction, enhancers, deep learning, regulatory elements, non-coding DNA, heterogeneous data integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review