Cited by 27Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Mathiomica: an integrative platform for dynamic omics

Open access
Mias, George I., Yusufaly, Tahir, Roushangar, Raeuf, Brooks, Lavida R. K., Singh, Vikas V., Christou, Christina·2016·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Multiple omics data are rapidly becoming available, necessitating the use of new methods to integrate different technologies and interpret the results arising from multimodal assaying. The MathIOmica package for Mathematica provides one of the first extensive introductions to the use of the Wolfram Language to tackle such problems in bioinformatics. The package particularly addresses the necessity to integrate multiple omics information arising from dynamic profiling in a personalized medicine approach. It provides multiple tools to facilitate bioinformatics analysis, including importing data, annotating datasets, tracking missing values, normalizing data, clustering and visualizing the classification of data, carrying out annotation and enumeration of ontology memberships and pathway analysis. We anticipate MathIOmica to not only help in the creation of new bioinformatics tools, but also in promoting interdisciplinary investigations, particularly from researchers in mathematical, physical science and engineering fields transitioning into genomics, bioinformatics and omics data integration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep37237

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PyIOmica includes algorithms adapted from MathIOmica, now made available as Python open source code, and expands graphical utilities for visualization of categorized temporal data and network representation of time series, extending previous developments to an open-source, community-accessible platform for data science.

    “PyIOmica includes optimized new algorithms adapted from MathIOmica (Mias et al., 2016; which runs on the proprietary Mathematica platform), now made available as Python open source code for all users, and additionally expands extensively graphical utilities for visualization of categorized temporal data, and network representation of time series.”

    From PyIOmica: longitudinal omics analysis and trend identification (2020) · cites this paper as Mias et al., 2016

  • Temporal trends are automatically discovered using periodogram and autocorrelation calculations based on a Lomb-Scargle transformation algorithm, which properly accounts for missing points and/or unevenly sampled data.

    “Temporal trends are automatically discovered using periodogram and autocorrelation calculations based on a Lomb-Scargle transformation algorithm (Mias et al., 2016), which properly accounts for missing points and/or unevenly sampled data.”

    From PyIOmica: longitudinal omics analysis and trend identification (2020) · cites this paper as Mias et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mias, G. I., Yusufaly, T., Roushangar, R., Brooks, L. R. K., Singh, V. V., & Christou, C.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Sisters of Mercy Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Mias, George I.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-11-24
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
37237-37237
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951891881
Cited by
27
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • Australian Abalone Growers Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (K99HG007065, R00HG007065)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Mathematica, Wolfram Language, multi-omics integration, multimodal data, dynamic profiling, personalized medicine, data annotation, data normalization, clustering, pathway analysis, ontology annotation, bioinformatics software
MeSH terms
Humans, Software, Computational Biology, Proteomics, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review