Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decreased expression of STING predicts poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer

Open access
Song, Shushu, Peng, Peike, Tang, Zhaoqing, Zhao, Junjie, Wu, Weicheng, Li, Haojie, Shao, Miaomiao, Li, Lili, Yang, Caiting, Duan, Fangfang, Zhang, Mingming, Zhang, Jie, Wu, Hao, Li, Can, Wang, Xuefei, Wang, Hongshan, Ruan, Yuanyuan, Gu, Jianxin·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

STING (stimulator of interferon genes) has recently been found to play an important role in host defenses against virus and intracellular bacteria via the regulation of type-I IFN signaling and innate immunity. Chronic infection with Helicobacter pylori is identified as the strongest risk factor for gastric cancer. Thus, we aim to explore the function of STING signaling in the development of gastric cancer. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect STING expression in 217 gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical resection. STING protein expression was remarkably decreased in tumor tissues compared to non-tumor tissues, and low STING staining intensity was positively correlated with tumor size, tumor invasion depth, lymph mode metastasis, TNM stage, and reduced patients’ survival. Multivariate analysis identified STING as an independent prognostic factor, which could improve the predictive accuracy for overall survival when incorporated into TNM staging system. In vitro studies revealed that knock-down of STING promoted colony formation, viability, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells, and also led to a defect in cytosolic DNA sensing. Besides, chronic H. pylori infection up-regulated STING expression and activated STING signaling in mice. In conclusion, STING was proposed as a novel independent prognostic factor and potential immunotherapeutic target for gastric cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep39858

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Song, S., Peng, P., Tang, Z., Zhao, J., Wu, W., Li, H., Shao, M., Li, L., Yang, C., Duan, F., Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Wu, H., Li, C., Wang, X., Wang, H., Ruan, Y., & Gu, J.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
39858-39858
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586653152
Cited by
216
References
4
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decreased expression of STING predicts poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep39858
The paper
Song, S., Peng, P., Tang, Z., Zhao, J., Wu, W., Li, H., Shao, M., Li, L., Yang, C., Duan, F., Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Wu, H., Li, C., Wang, X., Wang, H., Ruan, Y., & Gu, J. (2017). Decreased expression of STING predicts poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39858

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.