Cited by 23Electrochemical sensors and biosensorsAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

Sol–gel derived nitric oxide-releasing oxygen sensors

Marxer, Stephanie M., Robbins, Mary E., Schoenfisch, Mark H.·2005·The Analyst

Abstract

An amperometric sol-gel derived sensor that both releases nitric oxide (NO) and measures physiologically relevant concentrations of oxygen (PO2) is described. The sensor consists of a platinum electrode coated with an aminosilane/ethyltrimethoxysilane hybrid xerogel film. Hydrophilic polyurethane (HPU) is doped into the hybrid film to reduce sensor hydration time and increase oxygen permeability. Diazeniumdiolate NO donors are formed within the polymer matrix by exposing the cured film to high pressures of NO. These coatings release up to 7.2 pmol s(-1) cm(-2) of NO over the first 12 h and maintain detectable levels of NO release through 48 h. Sensors modified with HPU-doped, NO-releasing xerogels exhibit a linear response to O2 within 30 min of polarization at -0.65 V vs. Ag/AgCl, and have a sensitivity of approximately 6 nA/mmHg O2. The xerogel coating is stable in buffer solution with minimal fragmentation over 48 h. In vitro biocompatibility studies indicate that these materials effectively reduce platelet adhesion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b412079e

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marxer, S. M., Robbins, M. E., & Schoenfisch, M. H.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Schoenfisch, Mark H.
Venue
The Analyst
Published
2005
Volume
130
Issue
2
Pages
206-212
ISSN
  • 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5528
OpenAlex
W1997466488
Cited by
23
References
34
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Analyst (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 000708, R01EB000708)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Keywords
nitric oxide release, oxygen sensors, amperometric sensor, sol-gel xerogels, diazeniumdiolates, platinum electrode, biocompatibility, platelet adhesion
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrochemistry, Nitric Oxide, Oxygen, Swine, Phase Transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review