The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multifunctional nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and theragnosis
Abstract
Nanomedicine is the biomedical application of nanoscale materials for diagnosis and therapy of disease. Recent advances in nanotechnology and biotechnology have contributed to the development of multifunctional nanoparticles as representative nanomedicine. They were initially developed to enable the target-specific delivery of imaging or therapeutic agents for biomedical applications. Due to their unique features including multifunctionality, large surface area, structural diversity, and long circulation time in blood compared to small molecules, nanoparticles have emerged as attractive preferences for optimized therapy through personalized medicine. Multimodal imaging and theragnosis are the cutting-edge technologies where the advantages of nanoparticles are maximized. Because each imaging modality has its pros and cons, the integration of several imaging agents with different properties into multifunctional nanoparticles allows precise and fast diagnosis of disease through synergetic multimodal imaging. Moreover, nanoparticles are not only used for molecular imaging but also applied to deliver therapeutic agents to the disease site in order to accomplish the simultaneous imaging and therapy called theragnosis. This tutorial review will highlight the recent advances in the development of multifunctional nanoparticles and their biomedical applications to multimodal imaging and theragnosis as nanomedicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O. C., Margalit, R., & Langer, R. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387 · Cited by 8,710
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Micellar Nanocarriers: Pharmaceutical Perspectives
Torchilin, V. P. (2006) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-006-9132-0 · Cited by 1,910
Multimodality Imaging Probes: Design and Challenges
Louie, A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003538 · Cited by 1,044
Cited by
Nicolas, J., Mura, S., Brambilla, D., Mackiewicz, N., & Couvreur, P. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35265f · Cited by 1,270
New Generation Cadmium-Free Quantum Dots for Biophotonics and Nanomedicine
Xu, G., Zeng, S., Zhang, B., Swihart, M. T., Yong, K.-T., & Prasad, P. N. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00290 · Cited by 587
Polymeric AIE-based nanoprobes for biomedical applications: recent advances and perspectives
Zhang, X., Wang, K., Liu, M., Zhang, X., Tao, L., Chen, Y., & Wei, Y. (2015) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c5nr01444a · Cited by 508
The acidic tumor microenvironment: a target for smart cancer nano-theranostics
Feng, L., Dong, Z., Tao, D., Zhang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2018) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx062 · Cited by 426
A smart and versatile theranostic nanomedicine platform based on nanoporphyrin
Li, Y., Lin, T.-Y., Luo, Y., Liu, Q., Xiao, W., Guo, W., Lac, D., Zhang, H., Feng, C., Wachsmann-Hogiu, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5712 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, D.-E., Koo, H., Sun, I.-C., Ryu, J. H., Kim, K., & Kwon, I. C.
- Venue
- Chem. Soc. Rev.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2656-2672
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2136502605
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.