Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2

Markewitz, Peter, Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm, Leitner, Walter, Linssen, Jochen, Zapp, Petra, Bongartz, Richard, Schreiber, Andrea, Müller, Thomas E.·2012·Energy & Environmental Science
DOI 10.1039/c2ee03403d
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

While Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies are being developed with the focus of capturing and storing CO2 in huge quantities, new methods for the chemical exploitation of carbon dioxide (CCU) are being developed in parallel. The intensified chemical or physical utilization of CO2 is targeted at generating value from a limited part of the CO2 stream and developing better and more efficient chemical processes with reduced CO2 footprint. Here, we compare the status of the three main lines of CCS technologies with respect to efficiency, energy consumption, and technical feasibility as well as the implications of CCS on the efficiency and structure of the energy supply chain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2ee03403d

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Peters, 2011, ChemSusChem, 4, 1216, 10.1002/cssc.201000447 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Mikkelsen, 2010, Energy Environ. Sci., 3, 43, 10.1039/B912904A · DOI · Paper page
  3. Peters, 2009, TCE, 813, 46
  4. Offermans, 2012, Green Chem., 14, 1168, 10.1039/c2gc16485j · DOI
  5. Johnsson, 2011, Greenhouse Gases: Sci. Technol., 1, 119, 10.1002/ghg.9 · DOI
  6. Wilday, 2011, Symp. Ser., 156, 339
  7. Pires, 2011, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89, 1446, 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.01.028 · DOI · Paper page
  8. D'Alessandro, 2010, Angew. Chem., 49, 6058, 10.1002/anie.201000431 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Li, 2011, Coord. Chem. Rev., 255, 1791, 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wang, 2011, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89, 1609, 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Rao, 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4467, 10.1021/es0158861 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Moser, 2009, Energy Proc., 1, 807, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.107 · DOI
  13. Jockenhövel, 2009, VGB PowerTech, 4/2009, 89
  14. Schimkat, 2008, Energiespektrum, 3/2008, 28
  15. Yi, 2009, Chem. Eng. J., 145, 377, 10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.004 · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.004
  16. Hawthorne, 2008, Energy Proc., 1, 1387, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.182 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.182
  17. Ströhle, 2008, Energy Proc., 1, 1313, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.172 · DOI
  18. Abanades, 2004, AIChE J., 50, 1614, 10.1002/aic.10132 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ströhle, 2009, Chem. Eng. Technol., 32, 435, 10.1002/ceat.200800569 · DOI
  20. Castillo, 2011, Appl. Energy, 88, 1480, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.044 · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.044
  21. Stadler, 2011, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 7, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Pfaff, 2009, Energy Proc., 1, 495, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.066 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kneer, 2006, VGB PowerTech, 10, 74
  24. Stadler, 2011, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 7, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kneer, 2010, Energy Environ. Sci., 3, 198, 10.1039/B908501G · doi:10.1039/b908501g
  26. Engels, 2010, J. Membr. Sci., 359, 93, 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.01.048 · DOI
  27. Fischedick, 2006, VGB PowerTech, 86, 108
  28. Ariga, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 2369, 10.1039/C1JM14101E · DOI
  29. Renzenbrink, 2008, Energy Proc., 1, 615, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.081 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.081
  30. Kunze, 2010, Fuel Process. Technol., 91, 934, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.02.017 · DOI
  31. Grabner, 2010, Energy Convers. Manage., 51, 2179, 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.03.011 · DOI
  32. Rubin, 2007, Energy Policy, 35, 4444, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Fischedick, 2006, VGB PowerTech, 86, 108
  34. Leitner, 2002, Acc. Chem. Res., 35, 746, 10.1021/ar010070q · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kumar, 2010, Chem. Commun., 46, 6705, 10.1039/c0cc01443e · doi:10.1039/c0cc01443e
  36. Karmee, 2009, Green Chem., 11, 1052, 10.1039/b820606f · doi:10.1039/b820606f
  37. Gale, 2004, Energy, 29, 1319, 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.090 · DOI · Paper page
  38. May, 2005, VGB PowerTech, 85, 32
  39. Visser, 2008, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 2, 478, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Linssen, 2006, Brennstoff-Wärme-Kraft, 58, 59
  41. Markewitz, 2009, Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 31, 10.1007/s12398-009-0004-2 · doi:10.1007/s12398-009-0004-2
  42. Markewitz, 2004, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 54, 601
  43. Zapp, 2009, VGB PowerTech, 89, 95
  44. Koornneef, 2011, Energy Proc., 4, 2293, 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.119 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.119
  45. Koornneef, 2008, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 2, 448, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.008 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Korre, 2009, Energy Procedia, 1, 3771, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.177 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.177
  47. Odeh, 2008, Energy Policy, 36, 367, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.026 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Pehnt, 2009, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 3, 49, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Schreiber, 2009, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14, 547, 10.1007/s11367-009-0102-8 · DOI
  50. Singh, 2011, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 911, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Sleeswijk, 2008, Sci. Total Environ., 390, 227, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.040 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Zapp, 2012, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 8, 12, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.014 · DOI
  53. Nie, 2011, Energy Proc., 4, 2510, 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.147 · DOI
  54. Schreiber, 2012, J. Ind. Ecol., 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00435.x · DOI
  55. Lambertz, 2008, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 58, 16
  56. Czyperek, 2008, Energy Proc., 1, 303, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.042 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.042
  57. Laurenczy, 2011, Chimia, 65, 663, 10.2533/chimia.2011.663 · doi:10.2533/chimia.2011.663
  58. Centi, 2011, ChemSusChem, 4, 1265, 10.1002/cssc.201100313 · DOI
  59. Ion, 2010, Prepr. Pap.—Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 55, 47
  60. Dorner, 2010, Energy Environ. Sci., 3, 884, 10.1039/c001514h · DOI · Paper page
  61. Braunstein, 1988, Chem. Rev., 88, 747, 10.1021/cr00087a003 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Cokaja, 2011, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 50, 8510, 10.1002/anie.201102010 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Leitner, 1996, Coord. Chem. Rev., 153, 257, 10.1016/0010-8545(95)01226-5 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Leitner, 1995, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 34, 2207, 10.1002/anie.199522071 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Uhe, 2012, Chem.–Eur. J., 18, 170, 10.1002/chem.201102785 · DOI
  66. Morris, 2009, Acc. Chem. Res., 42, 1983, 10.1021/ar9001679 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,202

Metadata

Authors
Markewitz, P., Kuckshinrichs, W., Leitner, W., Linssen, J., Zapp, P., Bongartz, R., Schreiber, A., & Müller, T. E.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2012
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
7281
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
DOI
10.1039/c2ee03403d
OpenAlex
W2047182876
Cited by
1,202
References
2
FWCI
99.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ee03403d
The paper
Markewitz, P., Kuckshinrichs, W., Leitner, W., Linssen, J., Zapp, P., Bongartz, R., Schreiber, A., & Müller, T. E. (2012). Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee03403d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.