Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2

Markewitz, Peter, Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm, Leitner, Walter, Linssen, Jochen, Zapp, Petra, Bongartz, Richard, Schreiber, Andrea, Müller, Thomas E.·2012·Energy & Environmental Science
DOI 10.1039/c2ee03403d
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

While Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies are being developed with the focus of capturing and storing CO2 in huge quantities, new methods for the chemical exploitation of carbon dioxide (CCU) are being developed in parallel. The intensified chemical or physical utilization of CO2 is targeted at generating value from a limited part of the CO2 stream and developing better and more efficient chemical processes with reduced CO2 footprint. Here, we compare the status of the three main lines of CCS technologies with respect to efficiency, energy consumption, and technical feasibility as well as the implications of CCS on the efficiency and structure of the energy supply chain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2ee03403d

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Peters, 2009, TCE, 813, 46
  2. Wilday, 2011, Symp. Ser., 156, 339
  3. Jockenhövel, 2009, VGB PowerTech, 4/2009, 89
  4. Schimkat, 2008, Energiespektrum, 3/2008, 28
  5. Yi, 2009, Chem. Eng. J., 145, 377, 10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.004 · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.004
  6. Hawthorne, 2008, Energy Proc., 1, 1387, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.182 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.182
  7. Castillo, 2011, Appl. Energy, 88, 1480, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.044 · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.044
  8. Kneer, 2006, VGB PowerTech, 10, 74
  9. Stadler, 2011, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 7, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kneer, 2010, Energy Environ. Sci., 3, 198, 10.1039/B908501G · doi:10.1039/b908501g
  11. Fischedick, 2006, VGB PowerTech, 86, 108
  12. Renzenbrink, 2008, Energy Proc., 1, 615, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.081 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.081
  13. Fischedick, 2006, VGB PowerTech, 86, 108
  14. Kumar, 2010, Chem. Commun., 46, 6705, 10.1039/c0cc01443e · doi:10.1039/c0cc01443e
  15. Karmee, 2009, Green Chem., 11, 1052, 10.1039/b820606f · doi:10.1039/b820606f
  16. May, 2005, VGB PowerTech, 85, 32
  17. Linssen, 2006, Brennstoff-Wärme-Kraft, 58, 59
  18. Markewitz, 2009, Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 31, 10.1007/s12398-009-0004-2 · doi:10.1007/s12398-009-0004-2
  19. Markewitz, 2004, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 54, 601
  20. Zapp, 2009, VGB PowerTech, 89, 95
  21. Koornneef, 2011, Energy Proc., 4, 2293, 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.119 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.119
  22. Korre, 2009, Energy Procedia, 1, 3771, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.177 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.177
  23. Lambertz, 2008, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 58, 16
  24. Czyperek, 2008, Energy Proc., 1, 303, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.042 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.042
  25. Laurenczy, 2011, Chimia, 65, 663, 10.2533/chimia.2011.663 · doi:10.2533/chimia.2011.663
  26. Ion, 2010, Prepr. Pap.—Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 55, 47

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Markewitz, P., Kuckshinrichs, W., Leitner, W., Linssen, J., Zapp, P., Bongartz, R., Schreiber, A., & Müller, T. E.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2012
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
7281
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
DOI
10.1039/c2ee03403d
OpenAlex
W2047182876
Cited by
1,202
References
48
FWCI
99.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.