Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 960

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy

Open access
Shaner, Matthew R., Atwater, Harry A., Lewis, Nathan S., McFarland, Eric W.·2016·Energy & Environmental Science
DOI 10.1039/c5ee02573g
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Solar H 2 production cost ($ kg−1) techno-economic landscape for photoelectrochemical (PEC) and photovoltaic-electrolysis (PV-E). References include conventional H 2 production, robust outdoor material (artificial grass) and solar cell.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c5ee02573g

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. S. Dillich , T.Ramsden and M.Melaina, Hydrogen Production Cost Using Low-Cost Natural Gas, DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, 2012
  2. Smil, 2014, Sci. Am., 52
  3. Khaselev, 1998, Science, 280, 425, 10.1126/science.280.5362.425 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Licht, 2000, J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 8920, 10.1021/jp002083b · DOI · Paper page
  5. Peharz, 2007, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, 3248, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.036 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Nielander, 2014, Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 16, 10.1039/C4EE02251C · DOI · Paper page
  7. Arriaga, 2007, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, 2247, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.067 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.067
  8. Lehman, 1997, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 22, 465, 10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00127-9 · DOI
  9. Ghosh, 2003, Sol. Energy, 75, 469, 10.1016/j.solener.2003.09.006 · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2003.09.006
  10. M. Bolinger and S.Weaver, Utility-Scale Solar 2013, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2014
  11. G. Barbose , S.Weaver and N.Darghouth, Tracking the Sun VII, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2014
  12. W. G. Colella , B. D.James and J. M.Moton, Hydrogen Pathways Analysis for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) Electrolysis, Strategic Analysis Inc., 2014
  13. B. D. James , G. N.Baum, J.Perez and K. N.Baum, Technoeconomic Analysis of Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Hydrogen Production, Directed Technologies Inc., 2009 · DOI
  14. Pinaud, 2013, Energy Environ. Sci., 6, 1983, 10.1039/c3ee40831k · DOI · Paper page
  15. Walczak, 2015, ChemSusChem, 8, 544, 10.1002/cssc.201402896 · DOI
  16. J. Seel , G.Barbose and R.Wiser, Why Are Residential PV Prices in Germany So Much Lower Than in the United States?, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2013
  17. D. Feldman , R.Margolis and D.Boff, Q2/Q3 ‘14 Solar Industry Update, U.S. Department of Energy: SunShot, 2014
  18. T. Kimbis , C.Honeyman, N.Litvak, S.Kann, M. J.Shiao, S.Mehta, J.Jones, J.Baca, S.Rumery and A.Holm, Q2 2014 U.S. Solar Market Insight, Greentech Media Inc. and Solar Energy Industries Association, 2014
  19. Paul, 2008, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33, 490, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.10.040 · DOI · Paper page
  20. M. Zhou and Y.Liu, 2013 International Conference on Materials for Renewable Energy and Environment, 2014, pp. 52–56
  21. B. D. James , W. G.Colella and J. M.Moton, Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Production Pathways, Strategic Analysis Inc., 2013
  22. K. Melkonyan , Solar Glass Price Plunge to Cease as Trade Sanctions Take Effect, IHS Technology, 2014
  23. Goodrich, 2013, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 114, 110, 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.01.030 · doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2013.01.030
  24. Houchins, 2012, Membranes, 2, 855, 10.3390/membranes2040855 · DOI
  25. Cox, 2014, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111, 14057, 10.1073/pnas.1414290111 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Jacobsson, 2013, Energy Environ. Sci., 6, 3676, 10.1039/c3ee42519c · DOI · Paper page
  27. Carmo, 2013, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38, 4901, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Haussener, 2012, Energy Environ. Sci., 5, 9922, 10.1039/c2ee23187e · DOI · Paper page
  29. R. R. Barth , K. L.Simmons and C. S.Marchi, Polymers for Hydrogen Infrastructure and Vehicle Fuel Systems, Sandia National Laboratories, 2013 · DOI
  30. Hu, 2013, Energy Environ. Sci., 6, 2984, 10.1039/c3ee40453f · DOI · Paper page
  31. M. Woodhouse and A.Goodrich, A Manufacturing Cost Analysis Relevant to Single- and Dual-Junction Photovoltaic Cells Fabricated with III-Vs and III-Vs Grown on, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2014
  32. S. Kann , M. J.Shiao, C.Honeyman, N.Litvak, J.Jones, L.Cooper, T.Kimbis, J.Baca, S.Rumery and A.Holm, U.S. Solar Market Insight, Greentech Media Inc. and Solar Energy Industries Association, 2015
  33. C. Turchi , Parabolic Trough Reference Plant for Cost Modeling with the Solar Advisor Model (SAM), National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2010 · doi:10.2172/983729
  34. Bolton, 1985, Nature, 316, 495, 10.1038/316495a0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. T. G. Deutsch and J. A.Turner, Semiconductor Materials for Photoelectrolysis, 2014
  36. T. J. Grassman , J.Carlin, C.Ratcliff, D. J.Chmielewski, S. A.Ringel, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2013, pp. 149–153
  37. Rodriguez, 2014, Energy Environ. Sci., 7, 3828, 10.1039/C4EE01453G · DOI
  38. R. Pletka , J.Khangura, A.Rawlins, E.Waldren and D.Wilson, Capital Costs for Transmission and Substations, Western Electricity Coordinating Council, 2014
  39. W. Leighty , J.Holloway, R.Merer, B.Somerday, C.San Marchi, G.Keith and D.White, Compressorless hydrogen transmission pipelines deliver large-scale stranded renewable energy at competitive cost, Lyon, 2006
  40. Baufumé, 2013, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38, 3813, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.147 · DOI
  41. C. E. G. Padro and V.Putsche, Survey of the Economics of Hydrogen Technologies, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1999 · DOI · Paper page
  42. J. C. S. Long , California's Energy Future: The View to 2050, California Council on Science and Technology, 2011
  43. J. Reilly and S.Paltsev, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, 2007
  44. A. J. Garnet , C. R.Greig and M.Oettinger, ZeroGen IGCC with CCS, The University of Queensland, 2014
  45. D. M. Rastler , Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options, Electric Power Research Institute, 2011
  46. G. Parks , R.Boyd, J.Cornish and R.Remick, Hydrogen Station Compression, Storage, and Dispensing Technical Status and Costs: Systems Integration, NREL, 2014 · DOI · Paper page
  47. FuelCell Energy, 1.4 Megawatts DCF1500 Specifications Sheet, FuelCell Energy, 2013 · doi:10.1016/s1464-2859(13)70010-5
  48. D. Steward , G.Saur, M.Penev and T.Ramsden, Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Hydrogen Versus Other Technologies for Electrical Energy Storage, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2009
  49. C. Yang , J.Ogden, D.Sperling and R.Hwang, California's Energy Future: Transportation Energy Use in California, California Council on Science and Technology, 2011
  50. Sathre, 2014, Energy Environ. Sci., 7, 3264, 10.1039/C4EE01019A · DOI
  51. Hall, 2009, Energies, 2, 25, 10.3390/en20100025 · DOI · Paper page
  52. M. K. Mann , P. L.Spath and W. A.Amos, Technoeconomic Analysis of Different Options for the Production of Hydrogen from Sunlight, Wind and Biomass, 1999
  53. Chen, 2015, Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 3663, 10.1039/C5EE02908B · DOI
  54. R. Socolow , M.Desmond, R.Aines, J.Blackstock, O.Bolland, T.Kaarsberg, N. S.Lewis, M.Mazzotti, A.Pfeffer, K.Sawyer, J.Siiola, B.Smit and J.Wilcox, Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals, American Physical Society, 2011
  55. Reisch, 2015, Chem. Eng. News, 93, 15, 10.1021/cen-09313-buscon · doi:10.1021/cen-09313-buscon
  56. H. Herzog , Assessing the Feasibility of Capturing CO2 from the Air, MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, 2003
  57. Davison, 2007, Energy, 32, 1163, 10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.039 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Spurgeon, 2010, Adv. Mater., 22, 3277, 10.1002/adma.201000602 · DOI
  59. Shaner, 2014, Energy Environ. Sci., 7, 779, 10.1039/C3EE43048K · doi:10.1039/c3ee43048k
  60. Chen, 2015, Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 1736, 10.1039/C5EE00311C · doi:10.1039/c5ee00311c
  61. Berger, 2014, Energy Environ. Sci., 7, 1468, 10.1039/C3EE43807D · DOI
  62. Hu, 2014, Science, 344, 1005, 10.1126/science.1251428 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Seger, 2013, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 1057, 10.1021/ja309523t · DOI · Paper page
  64. Chen, 2011, Nat. Mater., 10, 539, 10.1038/nmat3047 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 960

Metadata

Authors
Shaner, M. R., Atwater, H. A., Lewis, N. S., & McFarland, E. W.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2016
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
2354-2371
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
DOI
10.1039/c5ee02573g
OpenAlex
W2400024430
Cited by
960
References
5
FWCI
31.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0004993)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c5ee02573g
The paper
Shaner, M. R., Atwater, H. A., Lewis, N. S., & McFarland, E. W. (2016). A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee02573g

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.