Cited by 20biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Investigation of the dinuclear effect of aluminum complexes in the ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone

Open access
Hsu, Chiao-Yin, Tseng, Hsi-Ching, Vandavasi, Jaya Kishore, Lu, Wei-Yi, Wang, Li-Fang, Chiang, Michael Y., Lai, Yi-Chun, Chen, Hsing-Yin +1 more·2017·RSC Advances

Abstract

Al complexes bearing hydrazine-bridging Schiff base ligands showed the best catalytic activity, approximately 3- to 11-fold higher than that of dinuclear Al complexes bearing Salen ligands and mononuclear Al complexes bearing Schiff base ligands.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7ra02136d

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If catalytic metal centers are too far apart, and the ligands connecting them can have resonance, their positive charge properties affect each other and affect the catalytic polymerization reaction in the same manner that electron-withdrawing groups do.

    “If the catalytic metal centers are too far apart, and the ligands connecting the catalytic metal centers can have resonance, their positive charge properties affect each other and thus affect the catalytic polymerization reaction in the same manner that electron-withdrawing groups do.”

    From Multinuclear metal catalysts in ring-opening polymerization of ε‑caprolactone and lactide: Cooperative and electronic effects between metal centers (2023) · cites this paper as [62]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An electron-deficient metal center is regarded as an electron-withdrawing group for another metal center and enhances the catalytic activity of a multinuclear metal catalyst.

    “An electron-deficient metal center is regarded as an electronwithdrawing group for other metal center and enhances the catalytic activity of multinuclear metal catalyst.”

    From Multinuclear metal catalysts in ring-opening polymerization of ε‑caprolactone and lactide: Cooperative and electronic effects between metal centers (2023) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Conclusions (section 3; page unavailable) report greater catalytic activity for a dinuclear aluminum complex and describe cooperation between its two Al centers. But section 2.2 identifies a hydrazine group—not an electron-deficient metal center—as the electron-withdrawing group. The paper does not support the claimed metal-to-metal electron-withdrawing mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multinuclear metal catalyst systems can be based on one of two types of mechanisms: cooperative processing of coordination-insertion reaction by metal centers, or electronic (inductive) effect.

    “Multinuclear metal catalyst systems can be based on one of two types of mechanisms.”

    From Multinuclear metal catalysts in ring-opening polymerization of ε‑caprolactone and lactide: Cooperative and electronic effects between metal centers (2023) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Introduction describes a cooperative coordination–insertion mechanism involving two aluminum centers, and Section 2.4 examines that mechanism for a dinuclear catalyst. Section 2.2 discusses an electron-withdrawing ligand effect on mononuclear aluminum complexes, but the paper does not identify that effect as a second mechanism for multinuclear systems or classify such systems into two types. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dinuclear complex 15 bearing hydrazine-bridging Schiff base exhibited the best catalytic activity of CL polymerization when compared to dinuclear complexes 17 and 19 because it had the shortest Al-Al distance (2.83 Å from DFT results).

    “Dinuclear complex 15 bearing hydrazine-bridging Schiff base exhibited the best catalytic activity of CL polymerization when compared to dinuclear complexes 17 and 19 because it had the shortest Al-Al distance (2.83 Å from density functional theory [DFT] results).”

    From Multinuclear metal catalysts in ring-opening polymerization of ε‑caprolactone and lactide: Cooperative and electronic effects between metal centers (2023) · cites this paper as [61]

    Section 3 (Conclusions; page not provided) reports that the hydrazine-bridged dinuclear Al complex had the highest catalytic activity for CL polymerization. Section 2.4 (page not provided) gives a DFT-calculated Al–Al distance of 2.83 Å for that catalyst, but does not compare its distance with those of the other complexes or establish that the distance caused its higher activity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Complex 15 also demonstrated higher catalytic activity than did mononuclear complexes 16, 18, and 20 because of the cooperative effect proved by the DFT mechanistic study.

    “Complex 15 also demonstrated higher catalytic activity than did mononuclear complexes 16, 18, and 20 because of the cooperative effect proved by the DFT mechanistic study as shown in Fig. 10.”

    From Multinuclear metal catalysts in ring-opening polymerization of ε‑caprolactone and lactide: Cooperative and electronic effects between metal centers (2023) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Polymerization results (§2.2) and Conclusions (§3) report that the dinuclear complex designated (1) had higher catalytic activity than the mononuclear Schiff-base complexes. The DFT discussion (§2.4) supports a cooperative mechanism, but it does not prove that cooperation caused the activity difference; this paper also does not use the cited numbering 15, 16, 18, and 20. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. W. Mattanavee, O. Suwantong, S. Puthong, T. Bunaprasert, V. P. Hoven and P. Supaphol, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2009, 1, 1076-1085;
  2. N. E. Zander, J. A. Orlicki, A. M. Rawlett and T. P. Beebe Jr, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 2074-2081;
  3. S. Tarafder and S. Bose, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 9955-9965;
  4. O. Castaño, N. Sachot, E. Xuriguera, E. Engel, J. A. Planell, J.-H. Park, G.-Z. Jin, T.-H. Kim, J.-H. Kim and H.-W. Kim, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 7512-7522;
  5. E. A. Rainbolt, K. E. Washington, M. C. Biewer and M. C. Stefan, Polym. Chem., 2015, 6, 2369-2381;
  6. L. C. Palmer, C. J. Newcomb, S. R. Kaltz, E. D. Spoerke and S. I. Stupp, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 4754-4783;
  7. D. J. A. Cameron and M. P. Shaver, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 1761-1776;
  8. J. Nicolas, S. Mura, D. Brambilla, N. Mackiewicz and P. Couvreur, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 1147-1235;
  9. C. G. Palivan, R. Goers, A. Najer, X. Zhang, A. Car and W. Meier, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 377-411.
  10. S. M. Guillaume, E. Kirillov, Y. Sarazin and J.-F. Carpentier, Chem.-Eur. J., 2015, 21, 7988-8003;
  11. J.-F. Carpentier, Organometallics, 2015, 34, 4175-4189;
  12. S. Bellemin and S. Dagorne, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 8747-8774;
  13. E. Piedra-Arroni, A. Amgoune and D. Bourissou, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 9024-9029;
  14. N. Ajellal, J.-F. Carpentier, C. Guillaume, S. M. Guillaume, M. Helou, V. Poirier, Y. Sarazin and A. Trifonov, Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 8363-8376;
  15. J. N. Hoskins and S. M. Grayson, Polym. Chem., 2011, 2, 289-299;
  16. C. M. Thomas, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 165-173;
  17. A. Arbaoui and C. Redshaw, Polym. Chem., 2010, 1, 801-826.
  18. J. Lewiński, P. Horeglad, M. Dranka and I. Justyniak, Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43, 5789-5791;
  19. N. Nomura, T. Aoyama, R. Ishii and T. Kondo, Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 5363-5366;
  20. N. Iwasa, J. Liu and K. Nomura, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 1148-1152;
  21. N. Iwasa, M. Fujiki and K. Nomura, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2008, 292, 67-75;
  22. N. Iwasa, S. Katao, J. Liu, M. Fujiki, Y. Furukawa and K. Nomura, Organometallics, 2009, 28, 2179-2187;
  23. J. Wu, X. Pan, N. Tang and C.-C. Lin, Eur. Polym. J., 2007, 43, 5040-5046;
  24. Z.-X. Du, J.-T. Xu, Y. Yang and Z.-Q. Fan, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2007, 105, 771- 776;
  25. C. Zhang and Z.-X. Wang, J. Organomet. Chem., 2008, 693, 3151-3158;
  26. K. V. Zaitsev, Y. A. Piskun, Y. F. Oprunenko, S. S. Karlov, G. S. Zaitseva, I. V. Vasilenko, A. V. Churakov and S. V. Kostjuk, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2014, 52, 1237-1250;
  27. D. Pappalardo, L. Annunziata and C. Pellecchia, Macromolecules, 2009, 42, 6056-6062;
  28. S. Tabthong, T. Nanok, P. Kongsaeree, S. Prabpaib and P. Hormnirun, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 1348-1359;
  29. W. Zhang, Y. Wang, W.-H. Sun, L. Wang and C. Redshaw, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 11587-11596;
  30. K. Matsubara, C. Terata, H. Sekine, K. Yamatani, T. Harada, K. Eda, M. Dan, Y. Koga and M. Yasuniwa, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2012, 50, 957-966;
  31. I. V. D. Meulen, E. Gubbels, S. Huijser, R. Sablong, C. E. Koning, A. Heise and R. Duchateau, Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 4301-4305;
  32. A. Meduri, T. Fuoco, M. Lamberti, C. Pellecchia and D. Pappalardo, Macromolecules, 2014, 47, 534-543.
  33. Z. Tang and V. C. Gibson, Eur. Polym. J., 2007, 43, 150-155;
  34. K. Ding, M. O. Miranda, B. Moscato-Goodpaster, N. Ajellal, L. E. Breyfogle, E. D. Hermes, C. P. Schaller, S. E. Roe, C. J. Cramer, M. A. Hillmyer and W. B. Tolman, Macromolecules, 2012, 45, 5387-5396;
  35. H. Du, A. H. Velders, P. J. Dijkstra, J. Sun, Z. Zhong, X. Chen and J. Feijen, Chem.-Eur. J., 2009, 15, 9836-9845;
  36. R.-C. Yu, C.-H. Hung, J.-H. Huang, H.-Y. Lee and J.-T. Chen, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 6450-6455;
  37. H.-C. Tseng, M. Y. Chiang, W.-Y. Lu, Y.-J. Chen, C.-J. Lian, Y.-H. Chen, H.-Y. Tsai, Y.-C. Lai and H.-Y. Chen, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 11763- 11773;
  38. D. J. Darensbourg, P. Ganguly and D. Billodeaux, Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 5406-5410;
  39. A. Bhaw-Luximon, D. Jhurry and N. Spassky, Polym. Bull., 2000, 44, 31-38; (i
  40. P. Hormnirun, E. L. Marshall, V. C. Gibson, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 2688- 2689;
  41. X. Pang, H. Du, X. Chen, X. Wang and X. Jing, Chem.-Eur. J., 2008, 14, 3126-3136;
  42. X. Pang, H. Du, X. Chen, X. Zhuang, D. Cui and X. Jing, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2005, 43, 6605-6612;
  43. X. Pang, X. Chen, H. Du, X. Wang and X. Jing, J. Organomet. Chem., 2007, 692, 5605-5613;
  44. W.-H. Sun, M. Shen, W. Zhang, W. Huang, S. Liu and C. Redshaw, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 2645-2653;
  45. C. Bakewell, R. H. Platel, S. K. Cary, S. M. Hubbard, J. M. Roaf, A. C. Levine, A. J. P. White, N. J. Long, M. Haaf and C. K. Williams, Organometallics, 2012, 31, 4729-4736;
  46. W.-A. Ma, L. Wang and Z.-X. Wang, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 4669-4677;
  47. H.-C. Tseng, M. Y. Chiang, W.-Y. Lu, Y.-J. Chen, C.-J. Lian, Y.-H. Chen, H.-Y. Tsai, Y.-C. Lai and H.-Y. Chen, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 11763-11773;
  48. M.-C. Chang, W.-Y. Lu, H.-Y. Chang, Y.-C. Lai, M. Y. Chiang, H.-Y. Chen and H. Y. Chen, Inorg. Chem., 2015, 54, 11292-11298;
  49. M. O. Miranda, Y. DePorre, H. Vazquez-Lima, M. A. Johnson, D. J. Marell, C. J. Cramer and W. B. Tolman, Inorg. Chem., 2013, 52, 13692-13701.
  50. W. Li, W. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Yao, Y. Zhang and Q. Shen, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 11378-11381;
  51. Y. Wang and H. Ma, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6729-6731;
  52. X. Pang, R. Duan, X. Li, Z. Sun, H. Zhang, X. Wang and X. Chen, Polym. Chem., 2014, 5, 6857-6864;
  53. T. R. Forder and M. D. Jones, New J. Chem., 2015, 39, 1974-1978;
  54. D. J. Darensbourg and O. Karroonnirun, Organometallics, 2010, 29, 5627-5634;
  55. D. J. Darensbourg, O. Karroonnirun and S. J. Wilson, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 6775-6787;
  56. J. Yang, Y. Yu, Q. Li, Y. Li and A. Cao, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2005, 43, 373-384;
  57. C. Kan, J. Ge and H. Ma, Dalton Trans., 2016, 45, 6682-6695;
  58. Z. Sun, R. Duan, J. Yang, H. Zhang, S. Li, X. Pang, W. Chen and X. Chen, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 17531-17538;
  59. N. Maudoux, T. Roisonel, V. Dorcet, J.-F. Carpentier and Y. Sarazin, Chem.-Eur. J., 2014, 20, 6131-6147;
  60. H.-L. Chen, S. Dutta, P.-Y. Huang and C.-C. Lin, Organometallics, 2012, 31, 2016- 2025;
  61. C. Kan and H. Ma, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 47402-47409;
  62. Z. Qu, R. Duan, X. Pang, B. Gao, X. Li, Z. Tang, X. Wang and X. Chen, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2014, 52, 1344-1352;
  63. X. Pang, R. Duan, X. Li and X. Chen, Polym. Chem., 2014, 5, 3894-3900;
  64. L. Li, B. Liu, C. Wu, S. Li, B. Liu and D. Cui, Organometallics, 2014, 33, 6474-6480;
  65. S. Doherty, R. J. Errington, N. Housley and W. Clegg, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 2382-2388;
  66. W. Ziemkowska, S. Kucharski, A. Kolodziej and R. Anulewicz-Ostrowska, J. Organomet. Chem., 2004, 689, 2930-2939;
  67. W. Ziemkowska, J. Kochanowski and M. K. Cyrański, J. Organomet. Chem., 2010, 695, 1205-1209.
  68. L. Chen, W. Li, D. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Q. Shen and Y. Yao, Inorg. Chem., 2015, 54, 4699-4708;
  69. X.-F. Yu and Z.-X. Wang, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 3860-3868;
  70. H.-L. Han, Y. Liu, J.-Y. Liu, K. Nomura and Y.-S. Li, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 12346-12353;
  71. M. Normand, T. Roisonel, J.-F. Carpentier and E. Kirillov, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 11692-11694;
  72. H.-C. Huang, B. Wang, Y.-P. Zhang and Y.-S. Li, Polym. Chem., 2016, 7, 5819-5827;
  73. F. Isnard, M. Lamberti, L. Lettieri, I. D'auria, K. Press, R. Troiano and M. Mazzeo, Dalton Trans., 2016, 45, 16001-16010.
  74. H.-C. Tseng, H.-Y. Chen, Y.-T. Huang, W.-T. Lu, Y.-L. Chang, M. Y. Chiang, Y.-C. Lai and H.-Y. Chen, Inorg. Chem., 2016, 55, 1642-1650;
  75. L. Wang, Q. Su, Q. Wu, W. Gao and Y. Mu, C. R. Chim., 2012, 15, 463-470.
  76. I. A. Fallis, D. M. Murphy, D. J. Willock, R. J. Tucker, R. D. Farley, R. Jenkins and R. R. Strevens, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 15660-15661;
  77. B. D. Clercq and F. Verpoort, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2002, 180, 67-76;
  78. A. Duda, Z. Florjanczyk, A. Hofman, S. Slomkowski and S. Penczek, Macromolecules, 1990, 23, 1640-1646.
  79. M. S. Hill, A. R. Hutchison, T. S. Keizer, S. Parkin, M. A. VanAelstyn and D. A. Atwood, J. Organomet. Chem., 2001, 628, 71-75.
  80. J. U. Ahmad, M. Nieger, M. R. Sundberg, M. Leskelä and T. Repo, J. Mol. Struct., 2011, 995, 9-19.
  81. C. Lee, W. Yang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1988, 37, 785-789;
  82. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
  83. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich and H. Krieg, J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132, 154104.
  84. A. V. Marenich, C. J. Cramer and D. G. Truhlar, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113, 6378-6396.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, C.-Y., Tseng, H.-C., Vandavasi, J. K., Lu, W.-Y., Wang, L.-F., Chiang, M. Y., Lai, Y.-C., Chen, H.-Y., & Chen, H.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Hsing-Yin
  • Chen, Hsuan-Ying
Venue
RSC Advances
Published
2017
Volume
7
Issue
31
Pages
18851-18860
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2603338134
Cited by
20
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
RSC Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (105-I004, KMU-DT105009)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (105-2113-M-037-007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
aluminum complexes, ring-opening polymerization, ε-caprolactone, Schiff base ligands, salen ligands, polymerization catalysts, catalytic activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review