Cited by 46Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchChemistry and Chemical EngineeringChemical Safety and Risk Management

Finding Essentiality Feasible: Common Questions and Misinterpretations Concerning the “Essential-Use” Concept

Open access
Cousins, Ian T., De Witt, Jamie C., Glüge, Juliane, Goldenman, Gretta, Herzke, Dorte, Lohmann, Rainer, Miller, Mark, Ng, Carla A. +4 more·2021·Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts

Abstract

The essential-use concept is a tool that can guide the phase-out of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and potentially other harmful substances of concern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d1em00180a

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The concept of 'essential use' has been proposed to identify which PFAS can be phased out, but there are challenges including a lack of comprehensive data on potential substitutes, the complexity of supply chains, product formulation, and product disposal.

    “To mitigate the ban on the entire chemical class of PFAS, the concept of ‘essential use’ has been proposed to identify which PFAS can be phased out. However, there are several challenges inherent in this approach, with these including a lack of comprehensive data on potential substitutes, the complexity of supply chains, product formulation, and product disposal [80].”

    From The EU’s Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Ban: A Case of Policy over Science (2023) · cites this paper as [80]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]ECHA - European Chemicals Agency (2020) Impacts of REACH restriction and authorisation on substitution in the EU. ECHA-20-R-09-EN. ISBN: 978–92-9481–618-4. Cat. Number: ED-03-20-354-EN-N. DOI: 10.2823/39789. Publ.date: July 2020. Available online at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/24152346/impact_rest_auth_on_substitution_en.pdf/7c95222f-5f84-57f7-4cba-65b8463c79d4. · DOI
  2. [31]Coop. The Danish Coop Bans Fluorinated Compounds in All Cosmetics. Press release 09-03-2019. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190309005001/en/Danish-Coop-Bans-Fluorinated-Compounds-Cosmetics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cousins, I. T., De Witt, J. C., Glüge, J., Goldenman, G., Herzke, D., Lohmann, R., Miller, M., Ng, C. A., Patton, S., Scheringer, M., Trier, X., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • East Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Milieu Consulting SPRL, Brussels, Belgium
  • NILU (NO)
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Commonweal (US)
  • Masaryk University (CZ)
  • European Environment Agency (DK)
Corresponding author
Cousins, Ian T.
Venue
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Published
2021
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
1079-1087
ISSN
  • 2050-7887 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7895
OpenAlex
W3173937427
Cited by
45
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science Processes & Impacts (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Veřejné služby Informačního systému (Masarykiana Brunensis Universitas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2020-01978)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P42ES027706)
  • Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000469)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Chemical Health and Safety › Chemical Safety and Risk Management
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, substances of concern, chemical management, chemical alternatives, supply chain regulation
MeSH terms
Fluorocarbons, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review