Cited by 55Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Translational PK–PD for targeted protein degradation

Bartlett, Derek W., Gilbert, Adam M.·2022·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

This tutorial review provides practical insights and a proposed roadmap for building the translational PK–PD understanding for protein degrader therapeutics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d2cs00114d

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartlett, D. W., & Gilbert, A. M.
Affiliations
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Bartlett, Derek W.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2022
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
3477-3486
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W4224302152
Cited by
55
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Society Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
targeted protein degradation, protein degraders, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, translational pharmacology, drug development, mathematical modeling, rational drug design
MeSH terms
Models, Biological, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review