The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Normal values for handgrip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors
Abstract
1. The maximal grip strength of the hand has been measured in a random sample of 359 men and 561 women aged over 65 years living in their own homes. The response rate was 80% from a representative demographic area of the U.K. Measurements were made of body mass, skeletal size (demispan) and grip strength. Grip strength was measured using a custom-built strain-gauged dynamometer. The best of three attempts was taken as definitive. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain information about customary activity, use of handgrip muscles, health and psychological well-being. This was repeated with 620 survivors 4 years later. 2. The results for strength were normally distributed. The right hand was 10% stronger than the left and men had twice the strength of women. Strength was significantly related to skeletal size and in men to body mass. The gender difference was only partly accounted for by skeletal size and women were substantially disadvantaged in terms of their strength/body mass ratio. 3. There was a significant decline in strength with age of 2%/year for men and women. Strength was also significantly related to customary activity, reported use of the hands and psychological and physical health. 4. After 4 years 620 survivors were re-measured. Grip strength had declined by 12% in men and 19% in women and these losses were significantly related to age. A significant decline was also found in reported use, customary activity and health scores, and in women in body mass and psychological health. The loss of strength was significantly related to the decline in reported use of the hands but not to the other losses. 5. It is concluded that loss of strength over time in old age may be seriously underestimated by cross-sectional studies, especially in women; and that the loss is consistently and predominantly related to lack of use, rather than loss of health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr
Janssen, I., Heymsfield, S. B., Wang, Z., & Ross, R. (2000) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.81 · Cited by 3,087
Invited Review: Aging and sarcopenia
Doherty, T. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00347.2003 · Cited by 1,764
Aging of skeletal muscle: a 12-yr longitudinal study
Frontera, W. R., Hughes, V. A., Fielding, R. A., Fiatarone, M. A., Evans, W. J., & Roubenoff, R. (2000) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.2000.88.4.1321 · Cited by 1,443
Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis
Peterson, M. D., Rhea, M. R., Sen, A., & Gordon, P. M. (2010) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004 · Cited by 808
Effects of Aging on Muscle Fibre Type and Size
Deschenes, M. R. (2004) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200434120-00002 · Cited by 671
Bohannon, R. W., Peolsson, A., Massy-Westropp, N., Desrosiers, J., & Bear-Lehman, J. (2006) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.physio.2005.05.003 · Cited by 598
Is grip strength a useful single marker of frailty?
Syddall, H., Cooper, C., Martin, F., Briggs, R., & Aihie Sayer, A. (2003) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afg111 · Cited by 564
Hand grip strength as a proposed new vital sign of health: a narrative review of evidences
Vaishya, R., Misra, A., Vaish, A., Ursino, N., & D’Ambrosi, R. (2024) · Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s41043-024-00500-y · Cited by 385
Muscle strength, disability and mortality
Rantanen, T. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00298.x · Cited by 317
Sarcopenia: prevalence, mechanisms, and functional consequences
Berger, M. J., & Doherty, T. J. (2010) · Interdisciplinary topics in gerontology and geriatrics · doi:10.1159/000319997 · Cited by 175
Lower extremity muscle function after strength or power training in older adults.
Marsh, A. P., Miller, M. E., Rejeski, W. J., Hutton, S. L., & Kritchevsky, S. B. (2009) · Journal of Aging and Physical Activity · doi:10.1123/japa.17.4.416 · Cited by 155
Muscle wasting and aging: Experimental models, fatty infiltrations, and prevention
Brioche, T., Pagano, A. F., Py, G., & Chopard, A. (2016) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2016.04.006 · Cited by 129
Muscle mass and strength: Relation to function in population studies
Harris, T. (1997) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/127.5.1004s · Cited by 122
Evaluation of the applicability of HRT as a preservative of muscle strength in women
Meeuwsen, I. B., Samson, M. M., & Verhaar, H. J. (2000) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/s0378-5122(00)00132-8 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Bassey, E. J., & Harries, U. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Science
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-337
- ISSN
- 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8736
- OpenAlex
- W10014889
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.