The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
School-Age Follow-Up of Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Abstract
Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to examine differences in speech/language and written language skills between children with suspected childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and children with other speech-sound disorders at school age. Method: Ten children (7 males and 3 females) who were clinically diagnosed with CAS (CAS group) were followed from the preschool years (ages 4–6) to school age (ages 8–10) and were compared with children with isolated speech-sound disorders (S group; n =15) and combined speech-sound and language disorders (SL group; n =14). Assessments included measures of articulation, diadochokinetic rates, language, reading, and spelling. Results: At follow-up, 8 of the children with CAS demonstrated improvement in articulation scores, but all 10 continued to have difficulties in syllable sequencing, nonsense word repetition, and language abilities. The children also exhibited comorbid disorders of reading and spelling. Group comparisons revealed that the CAS group was similar to the SL group, but not the S group during the preschool years. By school age, however, the SL group made more positive changes in language skills than the CAS group. Clinical Implications: These findings suggest that the phenotype for CAS changes with age. Language disorders persist in these children despite partial resolution of articulation problems. Children with CAS are also at risk for reading and spelling problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence of Specific Language Impairment in Kindergarten Children
Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., Buckwalter, P., Zhang, X., Smith, E., & O’Brien, M. (1997) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4006.1245 · Cited by 2,288
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test
SMITH, D. R. (2001) · Handbook of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1016/b978-012058570-0/50008-2 · Cited by 1,414
Bishop, D. V. M., & Adams, C. (1990) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1990.tb00844.x · Cited by 1,064
Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.26.1.3 · Cited by 949
Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised
Greenberg, D. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2562 · Cited by 931
Goldman‐Fristoe Test of Articulation 2
(2014) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese1037 · Cited by 846
Review of Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation.
Sherman, D. (1970) · Professional Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0020663 · Cited by 792
Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Children with Speech Disorder
Dodd, B. J. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 422
Clinical Assessment of Oropharyngeal Motor Development in Young Children
Robbins, J., & Klee, T. (1987) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders · doi:10.1044/jshd.5203.271 · Cited by 358
Toward an Understanding of Developmental Language and Reading Disorders
Kamhi, A. G., & Catts, H. W. (1986) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders · doi:10.1044/jshd.5104.337 · Cited by 312
Cited by
Murray, E., McCabe, P., & Ballard, K. J. (2015) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-s-13-0179 · Cited by 137
Deep phenotyping of speech and language skills in individuals with 16p11.2 deletion
Mei, C., Fedorenko, E., Amor, D. J., Boys, A., Hoeflin, C., Carew, P., Burgess, T., Fisher, S. E., & Morgan, A. T. (2018) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-018-0102-x · Cited by 80
McNeill, B. C., Gillon, G. T., & Dodd, B. (2009) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/0265659009339823 · Cited by 76
The genetics of reading disabilities: from phenotypes to candidate genes.
Raskind, W. H., Peter, B., Richards, T., Eckert, M. M., & Berninger, V. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00601 · Cited by 71
Thomas, D. C., McCabe, P., & Ballard, K. J. (2014) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.004 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, B. A., Freebairn, L. A., Hansen, A. J., Iyengar, S. K., & Taylor, H. G.
- Venue
- Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 122-140
- ISSN
- 0161-1461 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9129
- DOI
- 10.1044/0161-1461(2004/014
- OpenAlex
- W2065382921
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: School-Age Follow-Up of Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/014
- The paper
- Lewis, B. A., Freebairn, L. A., Hansen, A. J., Iyengar, S. K., & Taylor, H. G. (2004). School-Age Follow-Up of Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
