Cited by 18Stuttering Research and TreatmentLanguage Development and DisordersVoice and Speech Disorders

Measures of psychological impacts of stuttering in young school-age children: A systematic review

Jones, Monique L., Menzies, Ross G., Onslow, Mark, Lowe, Robyn, O'Brian, Sue, Packman, Ann·2021·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Abstract

Purpose Recent research has shown that some school-age children who stutter may have speech-related anxiety. Given this, speech-language pathologists require robust measures to assess the psychological effects of stuttering during the school-age years. Accordingly, this systematic review aimed to explore available measures for assessing the psychological impacts of stuttering in young school-age children and to examine their measurement properties. Method The systematic search protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: 163181). Seven online databases, in addition to manual searching and screening of reference lists, were used to identify appropriate measures for the population of children who stutter aged 7-12 years. The first two authors independently assessed the measures using the quality appraisal tool described by Terwee et al. (2007). Results Despite the comprehensive search strategy, only six measures were identified for quality appraisal. No assessment tool was found to possess adequate measurement properties for the eight assessed domains: content validity, internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility, reliability, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability. No measure had clear evidence of responsiveness to clinical change. Based on the criterion defined by the Terwee et al. (2007) appraisal tool, the Communication Attitude Test and the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for School-Age Children received the highest number of ratings in support of their measurement properties. Conclusions The results highlight a lack of available measures in this domain and poor practices in developing and testing measurement instruments. To ensure that clinicians and researchers are equipped with sound measures to meet the mental health needs of this vulnerable population, further research to establish resources is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00455

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, M. L., Menzies, R. G., Onslow, M., Lowe, R., O'Brian, S., & Packman, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
Venue
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Published
2021-06-04
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
1918-1928
ISSN
  • 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9102
OpenAlex
W3163536075
Cited by
18
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
stuttering, elementary school students, measurement properties, psychometric properties, child mental health
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Psychological Tests, Schools, Speech, Stuttering, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review