Cited by 96Stuttering Research and TreatmentLanguage Development and DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Stuttering, attractiveness and romantic relationships: The perception of adolescents and young adults

Van Borsel, John, Brepoels, Marie, De Coene, Janne·2011·Journal of Fluency Disorders

Abstract

Unlabelled The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible negative impact of stuttering on romantic opportunities for adolescents and young adults who stutter. The first part of the study investigated if being a person who stutters affects the attractiveness of adolescents and young adults to their peers. To this end, 343 males and 393 females were shown age-matched pictures with an accompanying verbal description of a person opposite his or her own sex which they scored for attractiveness. In half of the participants the verbal description mentioned that the individual depicted was as person who stutters, in the other participants no such reference was included. In a second part, 354 adolescents and young adults completed a questionnaire investigating their attitude towards engaging in a romantic relationship with a peer who stutters. In particular it was asked if stuttering would hold them from (a) starting a conversation, (b) having a date or (c) possibly "going steady" with a person. Results showed that to some extent adolescents and young adults consider peers who stutter less attractive than non-stuttering peers and that they are less likely to engage in a romantic relationship with them. Clinicians need to be aware of the obstacles that adolescent and young adult clients may have to face in their social development. Educational objectives The reader of this article will be able to (a) discuss the extent to which stuttering in adolescents and young adults aff…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.01.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Borsel, J., Brepoels, M., & De Coene, J.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
41-50
ISSN
0094-730X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054904449
Cited by
96
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
stuttering, romantic relationships, perceived attractiveness, adolescents, young adults, peer perception, dating, social development (developmental psychology)
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Attitude, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Desirability, Stuttering, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review