Cited by 61Stuttering Research and TreatmentLanguage Development and DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anxiety and depression symptoms in children and adolescents who stutter: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Bernard, Ria, Hofslundsengen, Hilde, Frazier Norbury, Courtenay·2022·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there are elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression in children and adolescents (aged 2-18 years) who stutter, and to identify potential moderators of increased symptom severity. METHOD: We conducted a preregistered systematic review of databases and gray literature; 13 articles met criteria for inclusion. A meta-analysis using robust variance estimation was conducted with 11 cohort studies comparing symptoms of anxiety in children and adolescents who do and do not stutter. Twenty-six effect sizes from 11 studies contributed to the summary effect size for anxiety symptoms (851 participants). Meta-analysis of depression outcomes was not possible due to the small number of studies. RESULTS: = 0.42) compared with nonstuttering peers. There were insufficient studies to robustly analyze depression symptoms, and qualitative review is provided. No significant between-groups differences were reported in any of the depression studies. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence indicates elevated symptoms of anxiety in some children and adolescents who stutter relative to peers. There was a tendency toward higher depression scores in this population, although reported between-groups differences did not reach statistical significance. These findings require replication in larger, preferably longitudinal studies that consider factors that may moderate risk. Nevertheless, our findings highlight a need for careful monitoring of mental health and well-being in young people who stutter. Supplemental Materials: http://osf.io/5m6zv.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00236

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernard, R., Hofslundsengen, H., & Frazier Norbury, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
  • Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
Venue
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Published
2022-02-09
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
624-644
ISSN
  • 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9102
OpenAlex
W4210401531
Cited by
61
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
stuttering, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, children, adolescents, mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Depression, Humans, Stuttering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review