The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To examine the value of uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation in the identification of women at risk of developing pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Methods: Uterine artery Doppler was carried out at 11–14 weeks in 3324 consecutive singleton pregnancies attending for routine care in three London hospitals. The right and left uterine arteries were identified using color flow mapping and velocity waveforms were obtained using pulsed Doppler. The mean pulsatility index of the two arteries was determined and the predictive value of a mean pulsatility index > the 95th centile in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia and/or fetal growth restriction was calculated. Results: Satisfactory flow velocity waveforms were obtained from both uterine arteries in 3195 (96.1%) of the 3324 pregnancies examined and complete outcome information was obtained for 3045 (95.3%) of these women. The 95th centile of the uterine artery mean pulsatility index was 2.35 and did not change significantly with gestational age. The pregnancy was complicated by pre‐eclampsia in 63 (2.1%) cases and by fetal growth restriction in 290 (9.5%) cases. The sensitivity of a mean pulsatility index > 2.35 for pre‐eclampsia (with or without fetal growth restriction) was 27.0% but for fetal growth restriction alone it was 11.7%. The respective sensitivities for these complications requiring delivery before 32 weeks of gestation were 60.0% and 27.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation identifies a high proportion of women who develop severe pre‐eclampsia and/or fetal growth restriction.Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
(1965) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(65)91037-8 · Cited by 16,856
KHONG, T. Y., DE WOLF, F., ROBERTSON, W. B., & BROSENS, I. (1986) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07830.x · Cited by 1,591
Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572
The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Davey, D. A., & MacGillivray, I. (1988) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(88)90090-7 · Cited by 1,288
Trophoblastic invasion of human decidua from 8 to 18 weeks of pregnancy
Pijnenborg, R., Dixon, G., Robertson, W. B., & Brosens, I. (1980) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/s0143-4004(80)80012-9 · Cited by 850
Pijnenborg, R., Bland, J. M., Robertson, W. B., & Brosens, I. (1983) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/s0143-4004(83)80043-5 · Cited by 735
Papageorghiou, A. T., Yu, C. K. H., Bindra, R., Pandis, G., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2001) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00572.x · Cited by 537
Self-citationNew birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks
Yudkin, P. L., Aboualfa, M., Eyre, J. A., Redman, C. W. G., & Wilkinson, A. R. (1987) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/0378-3782(87)90099-5 · Cited by 441
The pattern of interstitial trophoblasticinvasion of the myometrium in early human pregnancy
Pijnenborg, R., Bland, J. M., Robertson, W. B., Dixon, G., & Brosens, I. (1981) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/s0143-4004(81)80027-6 · Cited by 354
Cited by
Intrauterine growth restriction
Resnik, R. (2002) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01780-x · Cited by 1,022
Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation
Gómez, O., Figueras, F., Fernández, S., Bennasar, M., Martínez, J. M., Puerto, B., & Gratacós, E. (2008) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5315 · Cited by 592
Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management
Figueras, F., & Gardosi, J. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.055 · Cited by 485
Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia
Plasencia, W., Maiz, N., Bonino, S., Kaihura, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5157 · Cited by 425
Self-citationPlacental Pathology in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction
Mifsud, W., & Sebire, N. J. (2014) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000359969 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, A. M., Bindra, R., Curcio, P., Cicero, S., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 583-586
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2144825657
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00594.x
- The paper
- Martin, A. M., Bindra, R., Curcio, P., Cicero, S., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2001). Screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00594.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
