The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theories of drug craving, ancient and modern
Abstract
This paper reviews the principal theoretical models of drug craving and provides some directions for future research. The main models are classified broadly into three categories: (1) phenomenological models; based on clinical observation and description; these have been influential in classification systems of addictive disorders and in the development of pharmacological therapies; (2) conditioning models: based on conditioning theory; these have been influential in the development of cue exposure treatments; (3) cognitive theories; based on cognitive social learning theory: these have been influential in the development of cognitive therapies of addiction. It is concluded that no one specific theory provides a complete explanation of the phenomenon of craving. However, theories of craving grounded in general theories of human behaviour offer greatest promise, and generate more specific and testable research hypotheses. Theories that do not require craving to be present for relapse to occur have more empirical support than those that provide simplistic causal explanations. The cue‐reactivity model shows promise in the exploration of the relationship between craving and relapse. However, further attention to the phenomenology of craving could help to advise the future measurement and study of drug craving, particularly in the context of research in which drugs are available to human subjects, with adequate ethical safeguards. There is a need for further study of the temporal dynamics of craving and consensus in the field on the most appropriate methods of measurement. Finally, new psychotherapies such as cue exposure and pharmacotherapies that aim to attenuate drinking behaviour, such as naltrexone and acamprosate, provide opportunities to improve understanding of the nature and significance of craving. However, the relatively uncritical assumption that craving is the underlying basis of addiction and represents the most appropriate target for treatment is challenged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction
Robinson, T. (1993) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-p · Cited by 7,346
Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046234 · Cited by 6,223
Naltrexone in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence
Volpicelli, J. R. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820110040006 · Cited by 1,828
An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0036128 · Cited by 1,704
A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes
Tiffany, S. T. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.147 · Cited by 1,554
The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive–sensitization view
Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2000) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.95.8s2.19.x · Cited by 1,507
Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.
Rescorla, R. A., & Solomon, R. L. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0024475 · Cited by 1,487 · cited 1×
“Citing the work of Rescorla & Solomon (1967), Tiffany notes that conditioned stimuli can elicit a ‘central emotional state’ that functions to motivate or modulate instrumental behaviour.”
BackgroundStewart, J., de Wit, H., & Eikelboom, R. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.91.2.251 · Cited by 1,247
Alcohol dependence: Provisional description of a clinical syndrome
Edwards, G., & Gross, M. M. (1976) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.6017.1058 · Cited by 1,163
Cited by
Imaginary Relish and Exquisite Torture: The Elaborated Intrusion Theory of Desire.
Kavanagh, D. J., Andrade, J., & May, J. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.2.446 · Cited by 956
The clinical significance of drug craving
Tiffany, S. T., & Wray, J. M. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06298.x · Cited by 556
A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process
Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., & Johnson, A. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0800472x · Cited by 501
Neurobiology of craving, conditioned reward and relapse
Weiss, F. (2005) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2004.11.001 · Cited by 411
Craving's place in addiction theory: Contributions of the major models
Skinner, M. D., & Aubin, H.-J. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.024 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Drummond, D. C.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-46
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2137886791
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theories of drug craving, ancient and modern. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961333.x
- The paper
- Drummond, D. C. (2001). Theories of drug craving, ancient and modern. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961333.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.