Cited by 124Gastrointestinal motility and disordersFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchGut microbiota and health

Characteristics of patients with irritable bowel syndrome recruited from three sources: implications for clinical trials

Open access
Longstreth, G. F., Hawkey, C. J., Mayer, E. A., Jones, R. H., Naesdal, J., Wilson, I. K., Peacock, R. A., Wiklund, I. K.·2001·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: Variation in the characteristics of irritable bowel syndrome patients recruited for clinical trials from different sources could affect their response and the generalizability of trial results. Aim: To describe and compare the characteristics of three different groups of irritable bowel syndrome patients recruited into a ‘mock clinical trial.’ Methods: We enrolled 245 irritable bowel syndrome patients from three sources: (i) 121 from British primary practitioners; (ii) 72 from California newspaper advertisements; and (iii) 52 from a California gastroenterologist’s practice. We obtained demographic, clinical, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale data. Results: Most patients were young to middle‐aged women; the majority reported symptoms for > 5 years in all three groups. Subject characteristics varied among the groups. Typically, primary care patients were anxious, smokers and daily alcohol drinkers who had sought care recently for irritable bowel syndrome and tried antispasmodic drugs. Their symptoms were intermediate in severity between those of the other two groups. Advertisement subjects were the oldest, most highly educated, most often depressed, and were least likely to have sought care recently for symptoms, which were almost uniformly only moderate in severity. Gastroenterologist patients tended to be anxious and had nearly all sought care recently for symptoms, which were the most severe and most likely to include all three pain‐related Rome I criteria. Conclusion: Recruitment methodology affects important characteristics of an irritable bowel syndrome study group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01010.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Onset of new irritable bowel syndrome symptoms after a bout of infective gastroenteritis is relatively common, reported by 6%-17% of irritable bowel syndrome patients, while a recent internet survey reported 18%, with around 40% beginning while travelling.

    “Onset of new IBS symptoms after a bout of infective gastroenteritis is relatively common, reported by 6%–17% of IBS patients,121 while a recent internet survey reported 18%,122 with around 40% beginning while travelling.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Whitehead WE, Bosmajian L, Zonderman AB, et al. Symptoms of psychological distress associated with irritable bowel syn- drome. Comparison of community and medical clinic samples. Gastroenterology 1988; 95: 709±14.
  2. Thompson WG, Creed FH, Drossman DA, et al. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gastroenterol Internat 1992; 5: 75±91.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Longstreth, G. F., Hawkey, C. J., Mayer, E. A., Jones, R. H., Naesdal, J., Wilson, I. K., Peacock, R. A., & Wiklund, I. K.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
  • AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
Corresponding author
Longstreth, G. F.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07-09
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
959-964
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W1965471884
Cited by
124
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, patient recruitment, generalizability of trial results, primary care patients, anxiety, depression, symptom severity, Rome I criteria, smoking, alcohol consumption
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety, Clinical Trials as Topic, Colonic Diseases, Functional, Demography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Smoking, Reproducibility of Results, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Age of Onset, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review