CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,311Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research

Fossey, Ellie, Harvey, Carol, Mcdermott, Fiona, Davidson, Larry·2002·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Qualitative research aims to address questions concerned with developing an understanding of the meaning and experience dimensions of humans' lives and social worlds. Central to good qualitative research is whether the research participants' subjective meanings, actions and social contexts, as understood by them, are illuminated. This paper aims to provide beginning researchers, and those unfamiliar with qualitative research, with an orientation to the principles that inform the evaluation of the design, conduct, findings and interpretation of qualitative research. It orients the reader to two philosophical perspectives, the interpretive and critical research paradigms, which underpin both the qualitative research methodologies most often used in mental health research, and how qualitative research is evaluated. Criteria for evaluating quality are interconnected with standards for ethics in qualitative research. They include principles for good practice in the conduct of qualitative research, and for trustworthiness in the interpretation of qualitative data. The paper reviews these criteria, and discusses how they may be used to evaluate qualitative research presented in research reports. These principles also offer some guidance about the conduct of sound qualitative research for the beginner qualitative researcher.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council, 1995, ethical aspects of qualitative methods in health research. An information paper for institutional ethics committees
  2. McDermott F, 1995, Mental disorders: prevention and human services research
  3. Tesch R, 1990, Qualitative research: analysis types and softward tools
  4. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2000.00733.x · DOI
  5. McDermott F, 1992, International Journal of Drug Policy, 3, 135
  6. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02460.x · DOI
  7. Rapp C A, 1993, Social Work, 38, 727
  8. Smith J K, 1990, Paradigm dialog, 167
  9. Naudin J, 2000, Phenomenologie de l'identite humaine et schizophrenie: la philosophie du soi et ses implications therapeutiques: societe d'anthropologie phenomenologique et d'hermeneutique generale
  10. Hammersley M, 1995, Ethnography: principles in practice, 2nd edn
  11. Miller W L, 1992, Doing qualitative research, 3
  12. McDermott F, 1993, Not welcome anywhere: People who have serious psychiatric disorder and problematic drug and alcohol use
  13. Denzin N, 1994, Handbook of qualitative research, 500

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Fossey, Ellie
ORCID
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-12
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
717-732
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
DOI
10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
OpenAlex
W2092473556
Cited by
2,311
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 150 · 2024: 186 · 2023: 199 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 150 · 2014: 144 · 2013: 125 · 2012: 111
FWCI
84.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
qualitative research evaluation, research quality criteria, interpretivism, critical paradigm, research ethics, trustworthiness, qualitative data interpretation, mental health research
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychiatry, Research, Comprehension, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review