Cited by 148Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and ResearchGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Gender differences in the prevalence of impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in Mauritius. Does sex matter?

Open access
Williams, J. W., Zimmet, P. Z., Shaw, J. E., De Courten, M. P., Cameron, A. J., Chitson, P., Tuomilehto, J., Alberti, K. G. M. M.·2003·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Objective To examine gender differences in the characteristics and prevalence of various categories of glucose tolerance in a population study in Mauritius. Research design and methods In 1998, a community‐based cross‐sectional survey was conducted in Mauritius. Categories of glucose metabolism were determined in 5388 adults, with an oral glucose tolerance test given to those who did not have previously diagnosed diabetes (n = 4036). Other cardiovascular risk factors were assessed among those without known diabetes. Results For men and women the prevalence of diabetes (22.0 vs. 21.8%, respectively) and the prevalence of coexisting impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (3.2 vs. 2.9%) were similar. However, men were twice as likely as women to have isolated IFG [5.1% (4.2–6.0) vs. 2.9% (2.3–3.5)], despite being younger, thinner and with lower plasma insulin but higher lipids. Conversely, the prevalence of isolated IGT was lower in men [9.0% (7.9–10.2) vs. 13.9% (12.6–15.1)]. Among non‐diabetic individuals, fasting glucose was higher in men than women, whereas 2‐h glucose was higher in women. In people without diabetes, women had significantly higher body mass index, beta cell function (HOMA‐B), fasting and 2‐h insulin than men and significantly lower waist‐hip ratios, waist circumference, insulin sensitivity (HOMA‐S) and triglycerides. Conclusion In Mauritius, the distribution of impaired glucose metabolism differs by sex. The observation that IFG is more prevalent in men and IGT more prevalent in women raises important questions about their underlying aetiology and the ability of the current glucose thresholds to equally identify men and women at high‐risk of developing diabetes. IFG should be seen as a complimentary category of abnormal glucose tolerance, rather than a replacement for IGT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01059.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of pre-diabetic syndromes such as impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) differs by sex, with IFG being more prevalent in men while IGT is more prevalent in women.

    “The prevalence of pre-diabetic syndromes such as impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) differs by sex, with IFG being more prevalent in men while IGT is more prevalent in women [38–41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J. W., Zimmet, P. Z., Shaw, J. E., De Courten, M. P., Cameron, A. J., Chitson, P., Tuomilehto, J., & Alberti, K. G. M. M.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Health and Quality of Life (MU)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Cameron, A. J.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-22
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
915-920
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2015552976
Cited by
148
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01dk025446-18)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-25446)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
gender differences, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes prevalence, glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, waist-to-hip ratio, cardiovascular risk factors, Mauritius
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Body Constitution, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mauritius, Middle Aged, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review