Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Docosahexaenoic acid provides protection from impairment of learning ability in Alzheimer's disease model rats

Open access
Hashimoto, Michio, Hossain, Shahdat, Shimada, Toshio, Sugioka, Kozo, Yamasaki, Hiroshi, Fujii, Yoshimi, Ishibashi, Yutaka, Oka, Jun‐Ichiro, Shido, Osamu·2002·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6, n‐3), a major n‐3 fatty acid of the brain, has been implicated in restoration and enhancement of memory‐related functions. Because Alzheimer's disease impairs memory, and infusion of amyloid‐β (Aβ) peptide (1–40) into the rat cerebral ventricle reduces learning ability, we investigated the effect of dietary pre‐administration of docosahexaenoic acid on avoidance learning ability in Aβ peptide‐produced Alzheimer's disease model rats. After a mini‐osmotic pump filled with Aβ peptide or vehicle was implanted in docosahexaenoic acid‐fed and control rats, they were subjected to an active avoidance task in a shuttle avoidance system apparatus. Pre‐administration of docosahexaenoic acid had a profoundly beneficial effect on the decline in avoidance learning ability in the Alzheimer's disease model rats, associated with an increase in the cortico‐hippocampal docosahexaenoic acid/arachidonic acid molar ratio, and a decrease in neuronal apoptotic products. Docosahexaenoic acid pre‐administration furthermore increased cortico‐hippocampal reduced glutathione levels and glutathione reductase activity, and suppressed the increase in lipid peroxide and reactive oxygen species levels in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus of the Alzheimer's disease model rats, suggesting an increase in antioxidative defence. Docosahexaenoic acid is thus a possible prophylactic means for preventing the learning deficiencies of Alzheimer's disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00905.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Hashimoto, M., Hossain, S., Shimada, T., Sugioka, K., Yamasaki, H., Fujii, Y., Ishibashi, Y., Oka, J., & Shido, O.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05-21
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
1084-1091
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2103279359
Cited by
364
References
43
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Docosahexaenoic acid provides protection from impairment of learning ability in Alzheimer's disease model rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00905.x
The paper
Hashimoto, M., Hossain, S., Shimada, T., Sugioka, K., Yamasaki, H., Fujii, Y., Ishibashi, Y., Oka, J., & Shido, O. (2002). Docosahexaenoic acid provides protection from impairment of learning ability in Alzheimer's disease model rats. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00905.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.