Cited by 620Wound Healing and TreatmentsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementSkin Diseases and Diabetes

Differences in Cellular Infiltrate and Extracellular Matrix of Chronic Diabetic and Venous Ulcers Versus Acute Wounds

Open access
Loots, Miriam A.M., Lamme, Evert N., Zeegelaar, Jimmy, Mekkes, Jan R., Bos, Jan D., Middelkoop, Esther·1998·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

In diabetic patients, wound healing is impaired. We studied the pathogenesis behind this clinical observation by characterizing the pattern of deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules and the cellular infiltrate in chronic (>8 wk) diabetic wounds, compared with chronic venous ulcers and an acute wound healing model. Punch biopsies were obtained from the chronic ulcer margins and control samples were collected from upper leg skin 5, 19, 28 d and 12 and 18 mo postwounding (p.w.). T cells, B cells, plasma cells, granulocytes and macrophages, and the ECM molecules fibronectin (FN), chondroitin sulfate (CS), and tenascin (TN) were visualized using immunohistochemical techniques. Expression of FN, CS, and TN was detected in dermal tissue early in normal wound healing (5-19 d p.w.). Abundant staining was seen 3 mo p.w., returning to prewounding levels after 12-18 mo p.w. In the dermis of chronic diabetic and venous ulcers with a duration of 12 mo or more, a prolonged presence of these ECM molecules was noted. Compared with normal wound healing: (i) the CD4/CD8 ratio in chronic wounds was significantly lower (p < 0.0027) due to a relatively lower number of CD4+ T cells; (ii) a significantly higher number of macrophages was present in the edge of both type of chronic ulcers (p < 0.001 versus day 29 p.w.); and (iii) more B cells and plasma cells were detected in both type of chronic wounds compared with any day in the acute wound healing model (p < 0.04 for CD20+ and p < 0.01 for CD79a+ cells). These data indicate that important differences exist in the cellular infiltrate and ECM expression patterns of acute, healing versus chronic wounds, which may be related to the nonhealing status of chronic wounds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00381.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Barbul A: Role of the immune system. In: Cohen K, Diegelman RF, Lindblad WJ (eds). Wound Healing: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects, 1st edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992, pp. 282-291
  2. Knighton DR, Fiegel V. Growth factors and repair of diabetic wounds. In: Levin ME, O'neal LW, Bowker JH (eds). The Diabetic Foot, 5th edn. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1993, pp. 247-257
  3. Levin ME. Pathogenesis and management of diabetic foot lesions. In: Levin ME, O'neal LW, Bowker JH (eds). The Diabetic Foot, 5th edn. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1993, pp. 17-60

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loots, M. A. M., Lamme, E. N., Zeegelaar, J., Mekkes, J. R., Bos, J. D., & Middelkoop, E.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis (NL)
Corresponding author
Loots, Miriam A.M.
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
111
Issue
5
Pages
850-857
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079238808
Cited by
620
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
Keywords
diabetic wounds, venous leg ulcers, chronic wounds, acute wound healing, extracellular matrix, fibronectin, chondroitin sulfate, tenascin, cellular infiltrate, CD4/CD8 ratio, macrophages, B cells, plasma cells, CD20, CD79a, delayed wound healing
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Basement Membrane, Cell Count, Chondroitin Sulfates, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Extracellular Matrix, Female, Fibronectins, Granulocytes, Humans, Lymphocytes, Macrophages, Male, Middle Aged, Varicose Ulcer, Wound Healing, Wounds and Injuries, CD4-CD8 Ratio, Diabetic Foot, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Tenascin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review