Cited by 210Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsHealth disparities and outcomes

Religious involvement, social support, and health among African-American women on the east side of detroit

Open access
Olphen, Julian, Schulz, Amy, Israel, Barbara, Chatters, Linda, Klem, Laura, Parker, Edith, Williams, David·2003·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background A significant body of research suggests that religious involvement is related to better mental and physical health. Religion or spirituality was identified as an important health protective factor by women participating in the East Side Village Health Worker Partnership (ESVHWP), a community-based participatory research initiative on Detroit's east side. However, relatively little research to date has examined the mechanisms through which religion may exert a positive effect on health.Objective The research presented here examines the direct effects of different forms of religious involvement on health, and the mediating effects of social support received in the church as a potential mechanism that may account for observed relationships between church attendance and health.Design This study involved a random sample household survey of 679 African-American women living on the east side of Detroit, conducted as part of the ESVHWP.Main results Results of multivariate analyses show that respondents who pray less often report a greater number of depressive symptoms, and that faith, as an important source of strength in one's daily life, is positively associated with chronic conditions such as asthma or arthritis. Tests of the mediating effect of social support in the church indicated that social support received from church members mediates the positive relationship between church attendance and specific indicators of health.Conclusions These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that one of the major ways religious involvement benefits health is through expanding an individual's social connections. The implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21031.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-rated health is strongly related to objective health, that is, future health, health services use, and mortality.

    “While based on participants' subjective impression, self-rated health is strongly related to objective health, that is, future health, health services use, and mortality [505–507].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [505]

    The Measures: Dependent Variables section says the self-rated general-health item is highly predictive of population mortality. It does not say that self-rated health predicts future health or health-services use; references to service attendance concern church attendance, not health care. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Levin JS, Chatters LM, Ellison CG, Taylor RJ. Religious involve- ment, health outcomes, and public health practice. Curr Issues Public Health. 1996;2:220±5.
  2. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Key principles of community-based research. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19: 173±202.
  3. Larson DB, Pattison EM, Blazer DG, Omran AR, Kaplan BH. Research on religious variables in four major psychiatric journals, 1978±1982. Am J Psychiatry. 1986;143:329±34.
  4. Caldwell CH, Chatters LM, Billingsley A, Taylor RJ. Church-based support programs for elderly Black adults: congregational and clergy characteristics. In: Kimble MA, McFadden SH, Ellor JW, Seeber JJ, eds. Handbook on Religion, Spirituality, and Aging. Minneapolis, Minn: Augsburg Fortress; 1995:306±24.
  5. Leavy RL. Social support and psychological disorder: a review. J Community Psychol. 1983;11:3±21.
  6. Israel BA, Rounds KA. Social networks and social support: a syn- thesis for health educators. Adv Health Educ Promotion. 1987;2: 311±51.
  7. Kalton G. Introduction to Survey Sampling. Sage University Series, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, no. 35. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications; 1983.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olphen, J., Schulz, A., Israel, B., Chatters, L., Klem, L., Parker, E., & Williams, D.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2003-07
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
549-557
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2012135123
Cited by
210
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Henry Ford Health System
  • School of Public Health, University of Michigan
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U48/CCU515775)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
religious involvement, social support, church attendance, African American women, depressive symptoms, prayer frequency, chronic disease, asthma, arthritis, mediation, community-based participatory research, Detroit
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Community-Institutional Relations, Female, Health Services Research, Health Status, Humans, Michigan, Middle Aged, Religion, Social Support, Urban Health, Urban Population, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review