Cited by 112Dermatological diseases and infestationsYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchVector-borne infectious diseases

Qualitative and quantitative observations on the flea population dynamics of dogs and cats in several areas of Germany

Beck, W., Boch, K., Mackensen, H., Wiegand, B., Pfister, K.·2006·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

From an ongoing country-wide study on the spectrum, the epidemiology and the population dynamics of flea infestations in dogs and cats, important preliminary results from the three areas of Karlsruhe, Nuernberg and Leipzig are presented. A total of 1922 dogs and 1838 cats from 12 different veterinary practices or clinics in three areas of Germany were systematically examined between July 2003 and June 2004. All dogs and cats appearing for a clinical veterinary consultation on one regular working day per month, per practice, were clinically examined. Dogs and cats were examined irrespective of any kind of prior therapeutic or prophylactic insecticidal treatment. The results show that a total of 99 dogs (5.13%) and 263 cats (14.33%) were infested. Cats were more often flea-infested than dogs (p < 0.05). The highest infestation rates for dogs (x = 7.87%) were detected between July and October, and for cats (x = 21.14%) between July and September, the lowest infestation rates for dogs (x = 2.88%) were observed between November and May, and for cats (x = 12.16%) between November and April (p < 0.05). Although the prevalences were generally higher during the summer months, no statistical differences were detectable when looking at the pattern between the four seasons, neither for dogs, nor for cats. Interestingly, the highest prevalences in dogs (9.9%) were detected in June 2004 and comparatively, in cats (23.86%) in August. The lowest detection rates in dogs were seen (1.28%) in April and in cats (7.26%) in January. The preliminary results did not indicate any tendency for a relationship between climatic conditions and flea infestation rates. Similarly, no differences of the infestations rates were detectable between urban and rural areas, 56% (dogs) and 46% (cats) of the infested pets originated from urban habitats. The flea species collected include Ctenocephalides felis, Ctenocephalides canis, Archaeopsylla erinacei, Pulex irritans, Ceratophyllus gallinae, etc. The overall frequencies reveal that C. felis was the most prominent species (81.5%), followed by C. canis (12.5%), A. erinacei (2.7%) and P. irritans (1.7%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.12.021

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Canine and feline pulicosis is characterized by high infection rates everywhere.

    “Canine and feline pulicosis is characterized by high infection rates everywhere [7,9,11-14], thus treatment and prevention are a priority in veterinary medicine.”
  • Above-average warm weather in summer 2003 was an apparent cause of doubling documented flea infections, probably because of outdoor environmental conditions favourable for flea development.

    “Above-average warm weather in summer 2003 was an apparent cause of doubling documented flea infections, probably because of outdoor environmental conditions favourable for flea development.”
  • A recent study from Germany indicated the absence of a relationship between seasons, climatic conditions and presence of pulicosis in dogs and cats.

    “It is interesting to note a recent study from Germany, which indicated the absence of a relationship between seasons, climatic conditions and presence of pulicosis in dogs and cats.”
  • In the German study, no statistical differences were found in infestation patterns between the four seasons, albeit prevalence of pulicosis in dogs and cats was higher in the summer.

    “In this study, no statistical differences were found in infestation patterns between the four seasons, albeit prevalence of pulicosis in dogs and cats was higher in the summer [11].”
  • The highest infestation rates were detected in July-October and July-September for dogs and cats, respectively.

    “The highest infestation rates were detected in July-October and July-September for dogs and cats, respectively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, W., Boch, K., Mackensen, H., Wiegand, B., & Pfister, K.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Beck, W.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
137
Issue
1-2
Pages
130-136
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005326203
Cited by
112
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
flea infestation, dogs, cats, seasonal prevalence, Ctenocephalides felis, Ctenocephalides canis, Pulex irritans, Ceratophyllus gallinae, flea species composition, Germany, Karlsruhe, Nuremberg, Leipzig
MeSH terms
Animals, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Siphonaptera, Germany, Population Dynamics, Rural Population, Seasons, Urban Population, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review