CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fibrolytic activities and cellulolytic bacterial community structure in the solid and liquid phases of rumen contents

Open access
Michalet-Doreau, Brigitte, Fernandez, Isabelle, Peyron, C�line, Millet, Liliane, Fonty, G�rard·2001·Reproduction Nutrition Development
DOI 10.1051/rnd:2001122
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Four sheep were fed an alfalfa hay diet.Rumen content samples were collected three hours after feeding in order to total microorganism population (TP), solid attached population (SAP) and solid attached firmly population (SAFP).Fibrolytic specific activities (xylanase, CMCase and β-glycosidases) were estimated by the amount of reducing sugars or p-nitrophenol released from the appropriate substrate.The distribution of the three main cellulolytic bacterial species (Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens) was quantified by dot-blot hybridisation using specific 16S-rRNA-targeting probes.Specific activities of polysaccharidase enzymes were higher in SAP than in TP, and in SAFP than in SAP.The sum of RNA of the three cellulolytic bacterial species represented on average 9% of the total bacterial RNA, and increased after filtration.In all samples, the relative population size of F. succinogenes was higher than that of R. albus and of R. flavefaciens.These results demonstrate that the most active enzymes are secreted by the particle-associated microorganisms.The differences in composition of the microflora between the solid and liquid phase suggest that bacteria are not equally distributed throughout the rumen content: the cellulolytic species are present in a higher proportion in the solid phase of rumen contents. rumen content / fibrolytic activity / cellulolytic bacteria / oligonucleotide probeRésumé -Répartition de l'activité fibrolytique microbienne et des bactéries cellulolytiques entre phases solides et liquides du contenu ruminal.Quatre moutons, munis d'une canule du rumen, ont reçu un régime à base de foin.Des échantillons de contenus ruminaux étaient prélevés 3 h après la distribution du repas afin d'isoler la population totale de micro-organismes (TP), la population de microorganismes associés à la phase solide du contenu (SAP) et celle fermement associée à cette phase solide (SAFP).Les activités fibrolytiques spécifiques (xylanase, CMCase et β-glycosidases) étaient estimées

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/rnd:2001122

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biofilm phenotype enables effective hydrolysis of plant material within the rumen by concentrating digestive enzymes within the EPS in proximity to the substrate.

    “The biofilm phenotype has many advantages, including the concentration of digestive enzymes within the EPS in proximity to the substrate, an arrangement that enables effective hydrolysis of plant material within the rumen (Minato et al., 1966; Wolin et al., 1997; Michalet-Doreau et al., 2001; Leng, 2014).”

    From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Michalet-Doreau et al., 2001

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Coleman G.S., Rumen entodiniomorphid pro- tozoa, in: Backer J.R., Taylor A.E.R. (Eds.), Methods of cultivating parasites in vitro, Aca- demic Press, London, UK, 1978, pp. 35-54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Michalet-Doreau, B., Fernandez, I., Peyron, C., Millet, L., & Fonty, G.
Affiliations
  • Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores (FR)
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
Venue
Reproduction Nutrition Development
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2001-03
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
187-194
ISSN
  • 0003-388X (ISSN-L)
  • 0926-5287
  • 1297-9708
DOI
10.1051/rnd:2001122
OpenAlex
W2121022323
Cited by
107
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • annales de biologie animale biochimie biophysique (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
rumen contents, cellulolytic bacteria, bacterial community structure, solid phase, liquid phase, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, xylanase, endoglucanase, β-glycosidase, sheep, rumen microbiota
MeSH terms
Medicago sativa, Animals, Bacterial Adhesion, Cellulase, Glycoside Hydrolases, Gram-Positive Cocci, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Rumen, Sheep, Xylosidases, Immunoblotting, Molecular Probe Techniques, Oligonucleotide Probes, Xylan Endo-1,3-beta-Xylosidase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review