Cited by 387Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas

Korobkin, M, Brodeur, F J, Francis, I R, Quint, L E, Dunnick, N R, Londy, F·1998·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the CT contrast enhancement washout curves of adrenal masses and to determine the earliest time after initial enhancement that differentiation of adenomas from nonadenomas is possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast enhancement washout curves were generated after delayed contrast-enhanced CT scans of 52 adrenal adenomas and 24 nonadenomas. The optimal threshold value and corresponding sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of adenoma were determined according to attenuation values. Also, we calculated the percentage and relative percentage of enhancement washout at time delays from 5 to 45 min after initial enhancement. RESULTS: The mean percentage of enhancement washout for adrenal adenomas was 51% at 5 min and 70% at 15 min, compared with 8% and 20%, respectively, for nonadenomas. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of adenoma were both 96% at a threshold attenuation value of 37 H on the 15-min delayed enhanced scan. CONCLUSION: On CT, adrenal adenomas show a much earlier and more rapid washout of contrast enhancement than do nonadenomas. Adenomas and nonadenomas can be differentiated by attenuation values or the percentage or relative percentage of washout as early as 5-15 min after enhancement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.170.3.9490968

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative washout >40% suggests benign adenoma.

    “Values of > 40% suggest a benign adenoma (296,299,300) (Fig. 6).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [300]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korobkin, M., Brodeur, F. J., Francis, I. R., Quint, L. E., Dunnick, N. R., & Londy, F.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1998-03
Volume
170
Issue
3
Pages
747-752
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2105886595
Cited by
386
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Roentgenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
adrenal adenoma, adrenal mass, time-attenuation curves, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adenoma, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Contrast Media, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review