Cited by 170Electronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Electronic health record effects on work-life balance and burnout within the I3 population collaborative

Open access
Robertson, Sandy L., Robinson, Mark D., Reid, Alfred·2017·Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Abstract

Background: Physician burnout is a problem that often is attributed to the use of the electronic health record (EHR). Objective: To estimate the prevalence of burnout and work-life balance satisfaction in primary care residents and teaching physicians, and to examine the relationship between these outcomes, EHR use, and other practice and individual factors. Methods: Residents and faculty in 19 primary care programs were anonymously surveyed about burnout, work-life balance satisfaction, and EHR use. Additional items included practice size, specialty, EHR characteristics, and demographics. A logistic regression model identified independent factors associated with burnout and work-life balance satisfaction. Results: In total, 585 of 866 surveys (68%) were completed, and 216 (37%) respondents indicated 1 or more symptoms of burnout, with 162 (75%) attributing burnout to the EHR. A total of 310 of 585 (53%) reported dissatisfaction with work-life balance, and 497 (85%) indicated that use of the EHR affected their work-life balance. Respondents who spent more than 6 hours weekly after hours in EHR work were 2.9 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–4.4) more likely to report burnout and 3.9 times (95% CI 1.9–8.2) more likely to attribute burnout to the EHR. They were 0.33 times (95% CI 0.22–0.49) as likely to report work-life balance satisfaction, and 3.7 times (95% CI 2.1–6.7) more likely to attribute their work-life balance satisfaction to the EHR. Conclusions: More after-hours time spent on the EHR was associated with burnout and less work-life satisfaction in primary care residents and faculty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4300/jgme-d-16-00123.1

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robertson, S. L., Robinson, M. D., & Reid, A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Reid, Alfred
Venue
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
479-484
ISSN
  • 1949-8349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-8357
OpenAlex
W2624756857
Cited by
170
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
electronic health records, physician burnout, work-life balance, primary care residents, teaching physicians
MeSH terms
Work-Life Balance, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Internship and Residency, Job Satisfaction, Primary Health Care, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review