Cited by 82Electronic Health Records SystemsTechnology and Human Factors in Education and HealthInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bad Health Informatics Can Kill – Is Evaluation the Answer?

Shaw, N. T., Ammenwerth, E.·2005·Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract

Summary: Objective: Health care is entering the age of information society. It is evident that the use of modern information and communication technology (ICT) offers tremendous opportunities to improve health care. However, there are also hazards associated with ICT in health care. We want to present an overview of typical hazards associated with ICT in health care, and to discuss how ICT evaluation can be a solution. Methods: We analyze examples of failures and problems associated with ICT in health care. This collection is also made available on a website. Results and Conclusion: Systematic, continuous evaluation of quality and effects of ICT during the whole life cycle of ICT components seems to be one important approach to detect and prevent possible ICT hazards and failures, supporting a higher quality of patient care. However, empirical studies proving this assumption are needed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1633915

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relatively little time, thought, or resources have been devoted to assessing the potential risks associated with eHealth interventions.

    “it is of concern that, in this rush, relatively little time, thought, or resources have been devoted to assessing the potential risks associated with eHealth interventions [11]–[13],[33]–[36].”
  • eHealth applications that are inappropriately specified, have functional errors, are unreliable, user-unfriendly, or in a poorly prepared or supported environment can put patients' and the health service at risk.

    “eHealth applications that are inappropriately specified, have functional errors, are unreliable, user-unfriendly, or in a poorly prepared or supported environment can put patients' and the health service at risk.”
  • eHealth may compromise patient safety in a number of ways.

    “eHealth may compromise patient safety in a number of ways.”
  • Increased workloads on clinical users can in turn decrease the quality of patient care.

    “increased workloads on clinical users can in turn decrease in the quality of patient care”
  • Delays in answering emergency calls due to problems with emergency dispatching systems may lead to delays in emergency treatment.

    “delays in answering emergency calls due to problems with emergency dispatching systems may lead to delays in emergency treatment [12].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shaw, N. T., & Ammenwerth, E.
Affiliations
UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (AT)
Corresponding author
Ammenwerth, E.
Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
2005
Volume
44
Issue
01
Pages
1-3
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W157321957
Cited by
82
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods of Information in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
health informatics, information and communication technology in healthcare, ICT evaluation, life cycle assessment, quality of care, health information systems
MeSH terms
Medical Informatics, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review