Cited by 863Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

The Ethics of Clinical Research in the Third World

Angell, Marcia·1997·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

An essential ethical condition for a randomized clinical trial comparing two treatments for a disease is that there be no good reason for thinking one is better than the other.1,2 Usually, investigators hope and even expect that the new treatment will be better, but there should not be solid evidence one way or the other. If there is, not only would the trial be scientifically redundant, but the investigators would be guilty of knowingly giving inferior treatment to some participants in the trial. The necessity for investigators to be in this state of equipoise2 applies to placebo-controlled trials, as . . .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199709183371209

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angell, M.
Corresponding author
Angell, Marcia
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1997-09-18
Volume
337
Issue
12
Pages
847-849
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2062146075
Cited by
863
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
clinical research ethics, randomized controlled trials, equipoise, developing countries, research participant protection
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Developing Countries, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Informed Consent, Placebos, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, United States, United States Public Health Service, HIV Infections, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Ethical Review, Moral Obligations, Withholding Treatment, Ethical Relativism, Codes of Ethics, Control Groups, Editorial Policies, Research Subjects, Therapeutic Human Experimentation, Pregnant Women, Pregnant People, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review