Cited by 75Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareChild Welfare and Adoption

The Ethics of International Research with Abandoned Children

Open access
Millum, Joseph, Emanuel, Ezekiel J.·2007·Science

Abstract

36660MetricsTotal Downloads366Last 6 Months20Last 12 Months62Total Citations60Last 6 Months0Last 12 Months0View all metrics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1153822

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Placement decisions were made by the Romanian child protection system; the BEIP team did not have authority to control placement decisions, did not interfere with those decisions, and did not withhold treatment.

    “Placement decisions (including foster care or adoption) were made by the Romanian child protection system; thus, the BEIP team did not have authority to control placement decisions and did not interfere with those decisions, nor did they withhold treatment (Millum & Emanuel, 2007).”

    From Resilience following severe early life neglect: A review of longitudinal evidence from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (2026) · cites this paper as Millum & Emanuel, 2007

    In “Guarding Against Exploitation” (page not available), the paper says the state was responsible for the children and that BEIP researchers were not responsible for Romania’s institutionalization of them. In “The Ethics of the BEIP Study” (page not available), it says no child was put at additional risk to obtain the results. Our copy does not establish who made individual foster-care or adoption placements, whether the team lacked authority or refrained from interfering, or whether it withheld treatment. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The BEIP incorporated extensive ethical oversight and safeguards appropriate for this vulnerable population.

    “The BEIP incorporated extensive ethical oversight and safeguards appropriate for this vulnerable population (Millum & Emanuel, 2007).”

    From Resilience following severe early life neglect: A review of longitudinal evidence from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (2026) · cites this paper as Millum & Emanuel, 2007

    In “The Ethics of the BEIP Study” (page not specified), the authors discuss safeguards for children unable to consent and say the BEIP’s assessments were unlikely to harm them. “Guarding Against Exploitation” (page not specified) describes the researchers’ prompt communication of results to those able to act on them. Our copy does not establish that the BEIP had extensive ethical oversight, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Extensive ethical review concluded that study participation was unlikely to impose net harm to children, while offering the possibility of substantial direct and societal benefit.

    “Extensive ethical review concluded that study participation was unlikely to impose net harm to children, while offering the possibility of substantial direct and societal benefit (Millum & Emanuel, 2007).”
  • The ethics of BEIP have been discussed in detail by the principal investigators and ethics experts.

    “The ethics of BEIP have been discussed in detail by the principal investigators of the BEIP as well as ethics experts (Millum & Emanuel, 2007;”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. C. A. Nelson III et al., Science 318, 1937 (2007).
  2. M . Angell, N. Engl. J. Med. 337, 847 (1997).
  3. P. Lurie, S. M. Wolfe, N. Engl. J. Med. 337, 853 (1997).
  4. R. K. Lie, E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, D. Wendler, J. Med. Ethics 30, 190 (2004).
  5. A. Wertheimer, Exploitation (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999), p. 10.
  6. The participants in the 2001 Conference on Ethical Aspects of Research in Developing Countries, Hastings Center Rep. 34, 17 (May-June 2004).
  7. E. J. Emanuel, D. Wendler, C. Grady, JAMA 283, 2701 (2000).
  8. We thank C. Grady, F. Miller, G. Persad, A. Schulz-Baldes, D. Wendler, and A. Wertheimer. The opinions expressed are the authors' own. They do not reflect any position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service, or Department of Health and Human Services. 10.1126/science.1153822 www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 318 21 DECEMBER 2007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millum, J., & Emanuel, E. J.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
Venue
Science
Published
2007-12-21
Volume
318
Issue
5858
Pages
1874-1875
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1620096738
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99CL999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
research ethics, international research, abandoned children, child welfare, research with vulnerable populations
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Abandoned, Child, Institutionalized, Child, Preschool, Foster Home Care, Humans, Infant, Informed Consent, Romania, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Early Intervention, Educational, Bioethical Issues, Ethics, Research, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review