Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatotoxicity with Combination of Vemurafenib and Ipilimumab

Ribas, Antoni, Hodi, F. Stephen, Callahan, Margaret, Konto, Cyril, Wolchok, Jedd·2013·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The independent mechanisms of action and largely nonoverlapping toxicity profiles of vemurafenib and ipilimumab made it logical to test them together in a study of patients with melanoma. An unexpected level of hepatic toxicity caused the early termination of the study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc1302338

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ribas, A., Hodi, F. S., Callahan, M., Konto, C., & Wolchok, J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2013-04-04
Volume
368
Issue
14
Pages
1365-1366
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2040956995
Cited by
714
References
1
FWCI
56.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.