Cited by 145Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Pathways and Mechanisms of BRAF in Cancer Therapy

Open access
Poulikakos, Poulikos I., Sullivan, Ryan J., Yaeger, Rona·2022·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

With the identification of activating mutations in BRAF across a wide variety of malignancies, substantial effort was placed in designing safe and effective therapeutic strategies to target BRAF. These efforts have led to the development and regulatory approval of three BRAF inhibitors as well as five combinations of a BRAF inhibitor plus an additional agent(s) to manage cancer such as melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, anaplastic thyroid cancer, and colorectal cancer. To date, each regimen is effective only in patients with tumors harboring BRAFV600 mutations and the duration of benefit is often short-lived. Further limitations preventing optimal management of BRAF-mutant malignancies are that treatments of non-V600 BRAF mutations have been less profound and combination therapy is likely necessary to overcome resistance mechanisms, but multi-drug regimens are often too toxic. With the emergence of a deeper understanding of how BRAF mutations signal through the RAS/MAPK pathway, newer RAF inhibitors are being developed that may be more effective and potentially safer and more rational combination therapies are being tested in the clinic. In this review, we identify the mechanics of RAF signaling through the RAS/MAPK pathway, present existing data on single-agent and combination RAF targeting efforts, describe emerging combinations, summarize the toxicity of the various agents in clinical testing, and speculate as to where the field may be headed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2138

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BRAFV600E mutations are present in around 10% of advanced CRC patients and lead to constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway, drug resistance and a poor prognosis.

    “BRAFV600E mutations are present in around 10% of advanced CRC patients and lead to constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway, drug resistance and a poor prognosis [1–4].”

    From Co-targeting SRC overcomes resistance to BRAF inhibitors in colorectal cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction/Background states that BRAF V600 mutations occur in CRC and constitutively activate the RAS/MAPK pathway. The Clinical Implications section describes resistance to RAF inhibition in BRAFV600E CRC. Our copy does not establish that the mutation occurs in around 10% of advanced CRC patients or that it causes a poor prognosis; the reported short progression-free survival is for a treated trial cohort, not a general prognostic comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Corcoran, 2020, Clinical efficacy of combined BRAF, MEK, and PD-1 inhibition in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer patients [abstract]
  2. Janku, 2020, Interim results from a phase 1/2 precision medicine study of PLX8394- a next generation BRAF inhibitor [abstract], S2—3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Poulikakos, P. I., Sullivan, R. J., & Yaeger, R.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Poulikakos, Poulikos I.
  • Sullivan, Ryan J.
  • Yaeger, Rona
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2022-04-29
Volume
28
Issue
21
Pages
4618-4628
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W4225136170
Cited by
145
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (U54 CA224068, P30 CA008748, R01 C233736, R01 CA204314, R01 CA240362, R01CA238229, R01 CA193970, R01 CA229851, UM1 CA186709)
  • Irma T. Hirschl Trust
  • Melanoma Research Alliance
  • Melanoma Research Foundation
  • Breast Cancer Alliance
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
BRAF, BRAF inhibitors, BRAF V600 mutation, RAS/MAPK pathway, Raf signaling, combination therapy, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, colorectal cancer, drug resistance, drug toxicity, targeted cancer therapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review