Cited by 699SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 4 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

New SARS-CoV-2 Variants — Clinical, Public Health, and Vaccine Implications

Open access
Abdool Karim, Salim S., de Oliveira, Tulio·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The Challenge of SARS-CoV-2 Variants The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 (VOC-202012/01), 501Y.V2 (B.1.351), and P.1 (B.1.1.28.1) has aroused many concerns, including worsening Covid-1...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc2100362

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

5 Own result · 4 Own interpretation · 3 Not checked yet · 1 Sources not found · 1 No basis given

Verify all 3 references — free account

Show all 14 claims

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In South Africa, the 501Y.V2 variant increased its share of sequenced viruses from 11% in the first week of October 2020 to 60% in the first week of November 2020 and 87% in the first week of December 2020.

    “The 501Y.V2 variant spread rapidly in South Africa, accounting for 11% of the viruses sequenced (44 of 392) in the first week of October 2020, for 60% of those sequenced (302 of 505) in the first week of November 2020, and for 87% of those sequenced (363 of 415) in the first week of December 2020.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In Western Cape, hospital admission rates among diagnosed cases and the clinical characteristics of admitted patients were similar in the first and second waves.

    “Hospital admission rates of diagnosed cases and the clinical profile of admitted patients were similar in the first and second waves in Western Cape.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neutralization activity against the B.1.1.7 variant was modestly reduced by a factor of 1.5.

    “the B.1.1.7 variant showed a modest decrease in neutralization activity, by a factor of 1.5”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No evidence indicates that antiviral or anti-inflammatory treatments are less effective against the emerging variants than against earlier variants.

    “Although there is no evidence that antiviral agents and antiinflammatory treatments are any less effective with the emerging variants than with the preexisting variants”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The AZD1222 vaccine's efficacy was 3.2 times higher in the United Kingdom and Brazil than in South Africa (70% vs. 22%).

    “Efficacy was higher by a factor of 3.2 with the AZD1222 vaccine in the United Kingdom and Brazil than in South Africa (70% vs. 22%)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The NVX-CoV237 vaccine's efficacy was 1.8 times higher in the United Kingdom than in South Africa (89% vs. 49%).

    “higher by a factor of 1.8 with the NVX-CoV237 vaccine in the United Kingdom than in South Africa (89% vs. 49%)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Ad26.COV2.S vaccine's efficacy was 1.3 times higher in the United States than in South Africa (72% vs. 57%).

    “higher by a factor of 1.3 with the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine in the United States than in South Africa (72% vs. 57%)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All three variants carry the N501Y mutation, which replaces asparagine with tyrosine at position 501 in the spike protein's receptor-binding domain.

    “All three variants have the N501Y mutation, which changes the amino acid asparagine (N) to tyrosine (Y) at position 501 in the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 501Y.V2 and P.1 variants each have two further receptor-binding domain mutations, K417N/T and E484K.

    “The 501Y.V2 and P.1 variants both have two additional receptor-binding–domain mutations, K417N/T and E484K.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    These mutations raise the receptor-binding domain's affinity for the ACE2 receptor.

    “These mutations increase the binding affinity of the receptor-binding domain to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor.”
10 of 10

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Abdool Karim, S. S., & de Oliveira, T.
Affiliations
  • Centre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa, Durban, South Africa
  • KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform (KRISP), Durban, South Africa
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-05-13
Volume
384
Issue
19
Pages
1866-1868
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3138447431
Cited by
699
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 260 · 2021: 274
FWCI
52.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2 variants, Alpha variant, Beta variant, P.1, Omicron variant, clinical implications, public health implications, COVID-19 pandemic
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, United Kingdom, Humans, Mutation, South Africa, Treatment Outcome, Antibodies, Neutralizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review