Cited by 9,977Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.

Open access
Van den Berghe, Greet, Wouters, Pieter, Weekers, Frank, Verwaest, Charles, Bruyninckx, Frans, Schetz, Miet, Vlasselaers, Dirk, Ferdinande, Patrick, Lauwers, Peter, Bouillon, Roger·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance are common in critically ill patients, even if they have not previously had diabetes. Whether the normalization of blood glucose levels with insulin therapy improves the prognosis for such patients is not known. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled study involving adults admitted to our surgical intensive care unit who were receiving mechanical ventilation. On admission, patients were randomly assigned to receive intensive insulin therapy (maintenance of blood glucose at a level between 80 and 110 mg per deciliter [4.4 and 6.1 mmol per liter]) or conventional treatment (infusion of insulin only if the blood glucose level exceeded 215 mg per deciliter [11.9 mmol per liter] and maintenance of glucose at a level between 180 and 200 mg per deciliter [10.0 and 11.1 mmol per liter]). RESULTS: At 12 months, with a total of 1548 patients enrolled, intensive insulin therapy reduced mortality during intensive care from 8.0 percent with conventional treatment to 4.6 percent (P<0.04, with adjustment for sequential analyses). The benefit of intensive insulin therapy was attributable to its effect on mortality among patients who remained in the intensive care unit for more than five days (20.2 percent with conventional treatment, as compared with 10.6 percent with intensive insulin therapy, P=0.005). The greatest reduction in mortality involved deaths due to multiple-organ failure with a proven septic focus. Intensive insulin therapy also reduced overall in-hospital mortality by 34 percent, bloodstream infections by 46 percent, acute renal failure requiring dialysis or hemofiltration by 41 percent, the median number of red-cell transfusions by 50 percent, and critical-illness polyneuropathy by 44 percent, and patients receiving intensive therapy were less likely to require prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy to maintain blood glucose at or below 110 mg per deciliter reduces morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients in the surgical intensive care unit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa011300

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Webb AR, Shapiro MJ, Singer M, Suter PM, eds. Oxford textbook of critical care. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1999:490-5.
  2. Fietsam R, 1991, Am Surg, 57, 551
  3. Oritz A, 1997, J Investig Med, 45, 50
  4. Knauss WA, 1995, Intensive Care World, 11, 102

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9,977

Metadata

Authors
Van den Berghe, G., Wouters, P., Weekers, F., Verwaest, C., Bruyninckx, F., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Ferdinande, P., Lauwers, P., & Bouillon, R.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-11-08
Volume
345
Issue
19
Pages
1359-1367
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1980717583
Cited by
9,977
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 175 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 212 · 2019: 226 · 2018: 245 · 2017: 296 · 2016: 283 · 2015: 384 · 2014: 468 · 2013: 419 · 2012: 549
FWCI
212.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
intensive insulin therapy, critically ill patients, glycemic control, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, mortality, multiple organ failure, bloodstream infection, acute kidney injury, critical illness polyneuropathy, mechanical ventilation, surgical intensive care unit
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Care, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Artificial, Logistic Models, Survival Analysis, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, APACHE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review