A comparison study of continuous insulin infusion protocols in the medical intensive care unit: Computer-guided vs. Standard column-based algorithms
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of continuous insulin infusion (CII) via a computer‐guided and a standard paper form protocol in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Multicenter randomized trial of 153 ICU patients randomized to CII using the Glucommander (n = 77) or a standard paper protocol (n = 76). Both protocols used glulisine insulin and targeted blood glucose (BG) between 80 mg/dL and 120 mg/dL. RESULTS: The Glucommander resulted in a lower mean BG value (103 ± 8.8 mg/dL vs. 117 ± 16.5 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and in a shorter time to reach BG target (4.8 ± 2.8 vs.7.8 hours ± 9.1 hours, P < 0.01), and once at target resulted in a higher percentage of BG readings within target (71.0 ± 17.0% vs. 51.3 ± 19.7%, P < 0.001) than the standard protocol. Mean insulin infusion rate in the Glucommander was similar to the standard protocol (P = 0.12). The percentages of patients with ≥1 episode of BG <40 mg/dL and <60 mg/dL were 3.9% and 42.9% in the Glucommander and 5.6% and 31.9% in the standard, respectively [P = not significant (NS)]. Repeated measures analyses show that the probabilities of BG reading <40 mg/dL or <60 mg/dL were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.969, P = 0.084) after accounting for within‐patient correlations with or without adjusting for time effect. There were no differences between groups in the length of hospital stay (P = 0.704), ICU stay (P = 0.145), or inhospital mortality (P = 0.561). CONCLUSION: Both treatment algorithms resulted in significant improvement in glycemic control in critically ill patients in the medical ICU. The computer‐based algorithm resulted in tighter glycemic control without an increased risk of hypoglycemic events compared to the standard paper protocol. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2010. © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The frequency of blood glucose monitoring per hour of infusion was not different between groups (0.68 vs 0.62 tests/hour, P=NS).
“Similarly, when normalized to the duration of insulin infusion, the frequency of BG monitoring was not different with the protocols (0.68 ± 0.18 and 0.62 ± 0.22 tests/hour respectively, P = NS).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Repeated measures analyses found no significant between-group difference in probabilities of blood glucose <40 or <60 mg/dL after accounting for within-patient correlation, with or without time adjustment.
“Based on repeated measures analyses, the probabilities of BG reading <40 mg/dL or <60 mg/dL were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.969, P = 0.084) after accounting for within-patient correlations with or without adjusting for time effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fewer Glucommander patients had at least one blood glucose >200 mg/dL (11.7% vs 25%; P=0.057 unadjusted, P=0.034 adjusted for site).
“The number of patients with 1 or more episodes of BG >200 mg/dL (11.7% vs. 25%, P = 0.057 before adjusting for potential site difference and P = 0.034 after adjusting for site difference) were less in the Glucommander group than in the standard paper regimen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During insulin infusion, the Glucommander group had a lower mean glucose than the standard group (115.5 vs 131.0 mg/dL, P<0.001).
“The Glucommander group had a lower mean glucose value during insulin infusion (115.5 ± 20.7 vs. 131.0 ± 24.6 mg/dL, P < 0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Glucommander group reached the blood glucose target in less time than the standard group (4.8 vs 7.8 hours, P<0.001).
“The mean time to reach the BG target was shorter in the Glucommander group (4.8 ± 2.8 vs. 7.8 ± 9.1 hours, P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Once at target, a higher percentage of blood glucose readings stayed within 80-120 mg/dL with Glucommander than standard (71.1% vs 51.3%, P<0.001).
“Once patients achieved BG target, on average 71.1% of BG readings in the Glucommander and 51.3% in the standard group remained within the 80 mg/dL to 120 mg/dL target range (P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Glucommander was associated with a significantly lower rate of severe hyperglycemia during insulin infusion.
“In addition, the Glucommander was associated with a significantly lower rate of severe hyperglycemia during insulin infusion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hospital mortality was similar between groups (26.0% vs 21.9%, P=0.561).
“and hospital mortality (26.0% vs. 21.9%, P = 0.561).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mean hospital length of stay was similar between groups (17.5 vs 23.9 days, P=0.704).
“mean hospital LOS (17.5 ± 15.0 days vs. 23.9 ± 26.3 days, P = 0.704)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mean ICU length of stay was similar between Glucommander and standard groups (13.4 vs 8.5 days, P=0.145).
“Compared to the standard paper insulin infusion algorithm, patients treated with the Glucommander device had a similar mean ICU LOS (13.4 ± 13.8 vs. 8.5 ± 7.6 days, P = 0.145)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of blood glucose measurements was similar between groups (44.2 vs 41.2, P=NS).
“The numbers of BG measurements were similar between the Glucommander and standard paper algorithms (44.2 ± 39.8 and 41.2 ± 34.5 respectively, P = NS)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Once at target, the Glucommander group had a lower mean blood glucose than the standard group (103.3 vs 117.3 mg/dL, P<0.001).
“and once at target goal, in a lower mean BG values (103.3 ± 8.8 vs. 117.3 ± 16.5 mg/dL, P < 0.001) than the standard algorithm (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All hypoglycemia episodes occurred after patients had at least one glucose measurement within target range.
“All episodes of hypoglycemia occurred after the patients achieved ≥1 glucose measurement within the target range.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In hospitalized patients with and without diabetes, hyperglycemia predicts poor clinical outcome and mortality.
“Observational studies in hospitalized patients with and without diabetes indicate that hyperglycemia is a predictor of poor clinical outcome and mortality.1–4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [1] Clement S Braithwaite SS Magee MF Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals Diabetes Care 2004 27 553 597 14747243 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Umpierrez GE Isaacs SD Bazargan N You X Thaler LM Kitabchi AE Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002 87 978 982 11889147 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Van den Berghe G Wilmer A Hermans G Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU N Engl J Med 2006 354 449 461 16452557 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Van den Berghe G Wouters P Weekers F Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients N Engl J Med 2001 345 1359 1367 11794168 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Intravenous continuous insulin infusion is the preferred route for managing hyperglycemia in critical care.
“The use of intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) is the preferred route of insulin administration for the management of hyperglycemia in the critical care setting.1,11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Clement S Braithwaite SS Magee MF Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals Diabetes Care 2004 27 553 597 14747243 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Umpierrez GE Kitabchi AE ICU care for patients with diabetes Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2004 11 75 81 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The study was not powered to detect differences in mortality or clinical outcome between groups.
“In addition, our study was not powered to demonstrate differences in mortality or clinical outcome between treatment groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Both treatment algorithms produced significant improvement in glycemic control in critically ill medical ICU patients.
“Both treatment algorithms resulted in significant improvement in glycemic control in critically ill patients in the medical ICU.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
At the start of CII, mean blood glucose was similar between the Glucommander and paper protocol groups.
“At the start of CII, the mean BG value was similar for the Glucommander and paper protocols (189.7 ± 64.8 mg/dL and 188.4 ± 54.8 mg/dL, P = 0.419).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent randomized controlled trials have not confirmed the previously suggested benefits of intensive glucose control.
“Recent randomized controlled trials, however, have failed to confirm the previously suggested benefits of intensive glucose control,6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Griesdale DE de Souza RJ van Dam RM Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data CMAJ 2009 180 821 827 19318387 PMC2665940 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The rate of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) in this trial was lower than rates reported in recent international trials of intensive glycemic control.
“The rate of severe hypoglycemic events (<40 mg/dL) observed in both arms of our trial was significantly lower than those reported in recent international trials of intensive glycemic control.3,4,8”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] Van den Berghe G Wilmer A Hermans G Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU N Engl J Med 2006 354 449 461 16452557 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Van den Berghe G Wouters P Weekers F Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients N Engl J Med 2001 345 1359 1367 11794168 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Brunkhorst FM Engel C Bloos F Intensive insulin therapy and penta-starch resuscitation in severe sepsis N Engl J Med 2008 358 125 139 18184958 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Hypoglycemia may be an independent risk factor for poor clinical outcome and mortality in hospitalized patients.
“Minimizing the rate of hypoglycemia events is of major importance in hospitalized patients because it has been shown that hypoglycemia may be an independent risk factor of poor clinical outcome and mortality.20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Krinsley JS Grover A Severe hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: risk factors and outcomes Crit Care Med 2007 35 2262 2267 17717490 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The overall rate of severe hypoglycemic events in international trials ranged from 5% to 28.6%.
“The overall rate of severe hypoglycemic events in international trials ranged between 5% to 28.6%.3,4,7,8,18,19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [3] Van den Berghe G Wilmer A Hermans G Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU N Engl J Med 2006 354 449 461 16452557 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Van den Berghe G Wouters P Weekers F Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients N Engl J Med 2001 345 1359 1367 11794168 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Finfer S Chittock DR Su SY Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients N Engl J Med 2009 360 1283 1297 19318384 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Brunkhorst FM Engel C Bloos F Intensive insulin therapy and penta-starch resuscitation in severe sepsis N Engl J Med 2008 358 125 139 18184958 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Arabi YM Dabbagh OC Tamim HM Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients Crit Care Med 2008 36 3190 3197 18936702 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Wiener RS Wiener DC Larson RJ Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis JAMA 2008 300 933 944 18728267 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
The blood glucose targets used in this study were lower than those recently recommended by the AACE and ADA inpatient glycemic control task force.
“and the BG targets used in this study were lower than glycemic targets recently recommended by the AACE and ADA inpatient glycemic control task force.25”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Moghissi ES Korytkowski MT DiNardo M American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control Diabetes Care 2009 32 1119 1131 19429873 PMC2681039 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Low glycemic variability (SD <10 mg/dL or 10-20 mg/dL) is associated with lower mortality risk even after adjustment for illness severity.
“Low levels of glycemic variability (standard deviation [SD] <10 mg/dL or 10–20 mg/dL) have been shown to have a statistically significant lower risk of mortality, even after adjustment for severity of illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Dossett LA Cao H Mowery NT Blood glucose variability is associated with mortality in the surgical intensive care unit Am Surg 2008 74 679 685 discussion 685 18705566 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Intensified insulin therapy in critically ill patients is associated with more severe hypoglycemic events than less aggressive glycemic control protocols.
“In addition, intensified insulin therapy in critically-ill patients has been shown to be associated with a higher rate of severe hypoglycemic events than less aggressive glycemic control protocols.7–10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [7] Finfer S Chittock DR Su SY Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients N Engl J Med 2009 360 1283 1297 19318384 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Brunkhorst FM Engel C Bloos F Intensive insulin therapy and penta-starch resuscitation in severe sepsis N Engl J Med 2008 358 125 139 18184958 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] De La Rosa Gdel C Donado JH Restrepo AH Strict glycaemic control in patients hospitalised in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomised clinical trial Crit Care 2008 12 R120 18799004 PMC2592751 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Preiser JC Brunkhorst F Tight glucose control and hypoglycemia Crit Care Med 2008 36 1391 author reply 1391–1392 18379293 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Glycemic variability is a strong independent contributor to mortality risk in critically ill and surgical patients.
“Glycemic variability has been identified as a strong independent contributor to the risk of mortality in critically ill and surgical patients.24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Dossett LA Cao H Mowery NT Blood glucose variability is associated with mortality in the surgical intensive care unit Am Surg 2008 74 679 685 discussion 685 18705566 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The NICE-SUGAR multicenter study found an absolute increase in mortality with intensive glucose control.
“the large multicenter normoglycaemia in intensive care evaluation and survival using glucose algorithm regulation (NICE-SUGAR) study reported an absolute increase in mortality rate with intensive glucose control.7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Finfer S Chittock DR Su SY Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients N Engl J Med 2009 360 1283 1297 19318384 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
A total of 160 adult medical ICU patients were randomized.
“A total of 160 adult patients admitted to a medical ICU with new hyperglycemia (47%) or with a known history of diabetes (53%) were randomized into the study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 12
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Glucommander was associated with tighter glycemic control and less glucose variability than the standard paper protocol.
“The Glucommander algorithm was associated with tighter glycemic control and less glucose variability than the standard paper form protocol.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean inpatient blood glucose difference was 15.5 mg/dL, and daily differences were 17.4 to 24.4 mg/dL lower with Glucommander on days 2 to 6.
“The mean inpatient BG difference between treatment groups was 15.5 mg/dL (P < 0.001), with a mean daily BG difference ranging from 17.4 mg/dL to 24.4 mg/dL less for the Glucommander group during days 2 to 6 of therapy (P < 0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe proportion of patients with at least one blood glucose <60 mg/dL was 42.9% with Glucommander and 31.9% with standard, not significantly different.
“The number of patients who experienced one or more BG <40 mg/dL and <60 mg/dL was 3.9% and 42.9% in the Glucommander and 5.6% and 31.9% in the standard regimen, respectively (both, P = not significant [NS]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe proportion of patients with at least one blood glucose <40 mg/dL was 3.9% with Glucommander and 5.6% with standard, not significantly different.
“The number of patients who experienced one or more BG <40 mg/dL and <60 mg/dL was 3.9% and 42.9% in the Glucommander and 5.6% and 31.9% in the standard regimen, respectively (both, P = not significant [NS]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNone of the hypoglycemia episodes caused seizures or were judged to be associated with clinical deterioration.
“None of these episodes resulted in seizures or were otherwise judged to be associated with deterioration of clinical status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarly randomized trials of intensified insulin therapy in surgical and medical acute critical illness reported reduced risk of multiorgan failure, systemic infections, and short- and long-term mortality.
“Early randomized controlled trials of intensified insulin therapy in patients with surgical and medical acute critical illness reported a reduction on the risk of multiorgan failure and systemic infections,3–5 as well as short- and long-term mortality.1,4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [3] Van den Berghe G Wilmer A Hermans G Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU N Engl J Med 2006 354 449 461 16452557 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Van den Berghe G Wouters P Weekers F Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients N Engl J Med 2001 345 1359 1367 11794168 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Furnary AP Gao G Grunkemeier GL Continuous insulin infusion reduces mortality in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003 125 1007 1021 12771873 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [1] Clement S Braithwaite SS Magee MF Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals Diabetes Care 2004 27 553 597 14747243 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSeven randomized patients were excluded because of consent withdrawal, subcutaneous insulin during CII, or less than 4 hours of CII.
“Of them, 7 patients were excluded due to withdrawal of consent, treatment with subcutaneous basal or supplemental short-acting insulin during CII, or receiving less than 4 hours of CII.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis of 26 studies with 13,567 patients found no benefit in the general ICU population but a favorable mortality effect of intensive glycemic control in surgical ICU patients (RR 0.63; CI 0.44-0.91).
“Although a recent meta-analysis9 of 26 studies involving 13,567 patients reported no benefits in the general ICU population, it found a favorable effect of intensive glycemic control on mortality in surgical ICU patients (relative risk [RR], 0.63; confidence interval [CI], 0.44–0.91).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] De La Rosa Gdel C Donado JH Restrepo AH Strict glycaemic control in patients hospitalised in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomised clinical trial Crit Care 2008 12 R120 18799004 PMC2592751 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBlood glucose targets above 180 mg/dL or below 110 mg/dL are no longer recommended for ICU patients.
“Glucose targets >180 mg/dL or <110 mg/dL are no longer recommended in ICU patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Moghissi ES Korytkowski MT DiNardo M American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control Diabetes Care 2009 32 1119 1131 19429873 PMC2681039 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe treatment groups did not differ in mean age, gender, race, diabetes history, or primary admitting diagnosis.
“There were no differences in the mean age, gender, race, history of diabetes, or primary admitting diagnosis between treatment groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study excluded patients with severe renal insufficiency and those with a history of hyperglycemic crises.
“We also excluded patients with severe renal insufficiency and patients with a history of hyperglycemic crises.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was conducted in the medical ICU and excluded postsurgical patients and those expected to have major surgery during hospitalization.
“First, this study was conducted in the medical ICU and excluded postsurgical patients and subjects expected to undergo a major surgical procedure during the hospital stay.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningRaising blood glucose targets is likely to reduce or prevent mild and severe hypoglycemic events in the ICU.
“Raising the BG targets is likely to reduce or prevent the rate of mild and severe hypoglycemic events in the ICU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe trial was open-label.
“In this multicenter, prospective, open-label randomized study, 160 adult patients admitted to a medical ICU with new hyperglycemia or with a known history of diabetes treated with diet, insulin therapy or with any combination of oral antidiabetic agents were enrolled after written informed consent had been obtained from the patient or closest family member (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHypoglycemia can impair cerebral glucose metabolism and cause brain metabolic dysfunction.
“and can impair cerebral glucose metabolism resulting in brain metabolic dysfunction, as suggested by recent clinical studies.22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Oddo M Schmidt JM Carrera E Impact of tight glycemic control on cerebral glucose metabolism after severe brain injury: a microdialysis study Crit Care Med 2008 36 3233 3238 18936695 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe study planned 80 patients per group to have 80% power to detect a mean blood glucose difference of at least 30 mg/dL.
“We expected differences in mean BG concentration ≥30 mg/dL between groups. Assuming 2-tailed alpha of 0.05, a standard deviation of approximately 40, and a one-to-one allocation and no subject attrition, 80 patients per treatment group were thought to be sufficient to achieve 80% power for group mean comparisons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHypoglycemia may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias partly through QT prolongation.
“Hypoglycemia may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, in part due to the prolongation QT interval21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Cryer PE Axelrod L Grossman AB Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009 94 709 728 19088155 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe computer-guided algorithm achieved tighter glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemic events compared with the standard paper protocol.
“The computer-based algorithm resulted in tighter glycemic control without an increased risk of hypoglycemic events compared to the standard paper protocol.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Both treatment algorithms resulted in significant improvement in glycemic control with the Glucommander achieving glycemic glucose target in a shorter time of treatment, a lower mean glucose concentration, and in greater percentage of glucose measurements maintained within target range, without an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia compared to the standard paper protocol.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInsulin-induced hypoglycemia is associated with increased proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress.
“Moreover, insulin-induced hypoglycemia is also associated with increased proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, interleukin [IL]-1beta, IL-6, and IL-8) and oxidative stress23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Razavi Nematollahi L Kitabchi AE Stentz FB Proinflammatory cytokines in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemic stress in healthy subjects Metabolism 2009 58 443 448 19303962 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataPatients were randomized using a computer randomization table.
“Patients were randomized using a computer randomization table to receive CII following a computer-guided algorithm (Glucommander) or CII following a standard paper form insulin infusion algorithm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
It is not known whether computer-based algorithms are superior to standard paper protocols for achieving glucose control and reducing hypoglycemic events in critically ill patients.
“It is not known, however, if computer-based algorithms are superior to standard paper form-based protocols in achieving glucose control and in reducing hypoglycemic events in critically-ill patients.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
This study is the first to compare the safety and efficacy of continuous insulin infusion via a computer-guided algorithm and a standard paper form protocol in nonsurgical ICU patients.
“This study is the first to compare the safety and efficacy of a CII via a computer-guided algorithm and a standard paper form protocol in nonsurgical patients in the ICU.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Automated computerized IV insulin protocols, whether commercial or institutional, have improved glycemic control and are well accepted by nursing staff.
“Automated, computerized, IV insulin protocols, including commercially available or institutional-based protocols, have improved glycemic control, with good acceptance by nursing personnel.1294–1307”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1295]
The Abstract Conclusion and Discussion report improved glycemic control with the computer-guided Glucommander protocol in medical ICU patients. The Methods say nurses used the protocol, but our copy does not report nursing acceptance or test an institutional computerized protocol; its comparator was paper-based. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Target-range percentage differs between abstract and results
MinorThe abstract reports 71.0% of Glucommander readings within target after reaching the target, while the results report 71.1% for the same measure. Both values are printed to one decimal place.
“once at target resulted in a higher percentage of BG readings within target (71.0 ± 17.0% vs. 51.3 ± 19.7%, P < 0.001)”
“Once patients achieved BG target, on average 71.1% of BG readings in the Glucommander and 51.3% in the standard group remained within the 80 mg/dL to 120 mg/dL target range (P < 0.001).”
Cites
Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.
Van den Berghe, G., Wouters, P., Weekers, F., Verwaest, C., Bruyninckx, F., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Ferdinande, P., Lauwers, P., & Bouillon, R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011300 · Cited by 9,977 · see citing works
Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
(2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810625 · Cited by 5,119 · see citing works
Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU
Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Hermans, G., Meersseman, W., Wouters, P. J., Milants, I., Van Wijngaerden, E., Bobbaers, H., & Bouillon, R. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052521 · Cited by 3,639 · see citing works
Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis
Brunkhorst, F. M., Engel, C., Bloos, F., Meier-Hellmann, A., Ragaller, M., Weiler, N., Moerer, O., Gruendling, M., Oppert, M., Grond, S., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa070716 · Cited by 2,921 · see citing works
Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes
Umpierrez, G. E., Isaacs, S. D., Bazargan, N., You, X., Thaler, L. M., & Kitabchi, A. E. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.87.3.8341 · Cited by 2,195 · see citing works
Self-citationMoghissi, E. S., Korytkowski, M. T., DiNardo, M., Einhorn, D., Hellman, R., Hirsch, I. B., Inzucchi, S. E., Ismail-Beigi, F., Kirkman, M. S., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-9029 · Cited by 1,444 · see citing works
Self-citationCryer, P. E., Axelrod, L., Grossman, A. B., Heller, S. R., Montori, V. M., Seaquist, E. R., & Service, F. J. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-1410 · Cited by 1,277 · cited 1× · see citing works
“20 Hypoglycemia may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, in part due to the prolongation QT interval 21 and can impair cerebral glucose metabolism resulting in brain metabolic dysfunction, as suggested by recent clinical studies.”
Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals.
Clement, S., Braithwaite, S. S., Magee, M. F., Ahmann, A., Smith, E. P., Schafer, R. G., Hirsch, I. B., & on behalf of the Diabetes in Hospitals Writing Committee (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.553 · Cited by 1,266 · see citing works
Furnary, A. P., Gao, G., Grunkemeier, G. L., Wu, Y., Zerr, K. J., Bookin, S. O., Floten, H. S., & Starr, A. (2003) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1067/mtc.2003.181 · Cited by 1,130 · see citing works
Griesdale, D. E. G., de Souza, R. J., van Dam, R. M., Heyland, D. K., Cook, D. J., Malhotra, A., Dhaliwal, R., Henderson, W. R., Chittock, D. R., Finfer, S., et al. (2009) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.090206 · Cited by 1,096 · see citing works
Severe hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: risk factors and outcomes
Krinsley, J. S., & Grover, A. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000282073.98414.4b · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Implementation of a Safe and Effective Insulin Infusion Protocol in a Medical Intensive Care Unit
Goldberg, P. A., Siegel, M. D., Sherwin, R. S., Halickman, J. I., Lee, M., Bailey, V., Lee, S. L., Dziura, J. D., & Inzucchi, S. E. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.461 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Arabi, Y. M., Dabbagh, O. C., Tamim, H. M., Al-Shimemeri, A. A., Memish, Z. A., Haddad, S. H., Syed, S. J., Giridhar, H. R., Rishu, A. H., Al-Daker, M. O., et al. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31818f21aa · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Oddo, M., Schmidt, J. M., Carrera, E., Badjatia, N., Connolly, E. S., Presciutti, M., Ostapkovich, N. D., Levine, J. M., Roux, P. L., & Mayer, S. A. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31818f4026 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
De La Rosa, G. D. C., Donado, J. H., Restrepo, A. H., Quintero, A. M., González, L. G., Saldarriaga, N. E., Bedoya, M., Toro, J. M., Velásquez, J. B., Valencia, J. C., et al. (2008) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc7017 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Hyperglycemic Crises in Diabetes
American Diabetes Association (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2007.s94 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Davidson, P. C., Steed, R. D., & Bode, B. W. (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.10.2418 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-citationProinflammatory cytokines in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemic stress in healthy subjects
Razavi Nematollahi, L., Kitabchi, A. E., Stentz, F. B., Wan, J. Y., Larijani, B. A., Tehrani, M. M., Gozashti, M. H., Omidfar, K., & Taheri, E. (2009) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2008.10.018 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationBenefits and Risks of Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults: A Meta-analysis
Wiener, R. S., Wiener, D. C., & Larson, R. J. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.8.933 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Blood glucose variability is associated with mortality in the surgical intensive care unit
Dossett, L. A., Cao, H., Mowery, N. T., Dortch, M. J., Morris, J. M., & May, A. K. (2008) · The American Surgeon™ · doi:10.1177/000313480807400802 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Markovitz, L. J., Wiechmann, R. J., Harris, N., Hayden, V., Cooper, J. B., Johnson, G. H., Harelstad, R., Calkins, L., & Braithwaite, S. S. (2002) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep.8.1.10 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Juneja, R., Roudebush, C. P., Kumar, N., Macy, A., Golas, A. A., Wall, D., Wolverton, C. L., Nelson, D., Carroll, J. C., & Flanders, S. J. (2007) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2006.0015 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Kitabchi, A. E., Freire, A. X., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2007) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2007.08.014 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationICU care for patients with diabetes
Umpierrez, G. E., & Kitabchi, A. E. (2004) · Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes · doi:10.1097/01.med.0000129636.04145.84 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationTight glucose control and hypoglycemia
Preiser, J.-C., & Brunkhorst, F. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31816a16d0 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694 · see citing works
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8 · Cited by 7,282 · see citing works
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016.
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Nunnally, M. E., et al. (2017) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 · Cited by 6,621 · see citing works
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016.
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Nunnally, M. E., et al. (2017) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002255 · Cited by 3,652 · see citing works
Alhazzani, W. A., Møller, M. H., Arabi, Y. M., Loeb, M. B., Gong, M. N., Fan, E., Oczkowski, S. J. W., Levy, M. M., Derde, L. P. G., Dzierba, A. L., et al. (2020) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004363 · Cited by 1,567 · see citing works
Jacobi, J., Bircher, N. G., Krinsley, J. S., Agus, M. S. D., Braithwaite, S. S., Deutschman, C. S., Freire, A. X., Geehan, D., Kohl, B., Nasraway, S. A., et al. (2012) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182653269 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Self-citationBlonde, L., Umpierrez, G. E., Reddy, S. S., McGill, J. B., Berga, S. L., Bush, M., Chandrasekaran, S., DeFronzo, R. A., Einhorn, D., Galindo, R. J., et al. (2022) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Self-citationRoumeliotis, N., Sniderman, J., Adams-Webber, T., Addo, N., Anand, V., Rochon, P., Taddio, A., & Parshuram, C. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05236-8 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
S3-Leitlinie Sepsis – Prävention, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge
Deutsche Sepsis Gesellschaft e., V., Brunkhorst, F. M., Weigand, M. A., Pletz, M. W., Gastmeier, P., Lemmen, S., Meier‐Hellmann, A., Ragaller, M., Weyland, A., Marx, G., et al. (2020) · Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · doi:10.1007/s00063-020-00685-0 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Insulin Therapy for the Management of Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients
McDonnell, M. E., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2012) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2012.01.001 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical Practice Guideline: Safe Medication Use in the ICU
Kane‐Gill, S. L., Dasta, J. F., Buckley, M. S., Devabhakthuni, S., Liu, M., Cohen, H., GEORGE, E. L., Pohlman, A. S., Agarwal, S., Henneman, E. A., et al. (2017) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002533 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
A practical guide for the management of steroid induced hyperglycaemia in the hospital
Aberer, F., Hochfellner, D. A., Sourij, H., & Mader, J. K. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10102154 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Klonoff, D. C., Messler, J., Umpierrez, G. E., Peng, L., Booth, R., Crowe, J., Garrett, V., McFarland, R., & Pasquel, F. J. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-1857 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationPerioperative management of hyperglycemia and diabetes in cardiac surgery patients
Galindo, R. J., Fayfman, M., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2018) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2017.10.005 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationDavis, G. M., Faulds, E., Walker, T., Vigliotti, D., Rabinovich, M., Hester, J., Peng, L., McLean, B., Hannon, P., Poindexter, N., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-2085 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationMarvin, M. R., Inzucchi, S. E., & Besterman, B. J. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2012.0277 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Diabetes technology in the inpatient setting for management of hyperglycemia
Davis, G. M., Galindo, R. J., Migdal, A. L., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2020) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2019.11.002 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationContinuous Insulin Infusion: When, Where, and How?
Kelly, J. L. (2014) · Diabetes Spectrum · doi:10.2337/diaspect.27.3.218 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Ullal, J., Aloi, J. A., Reyes-Umpierrez, D., Pasquel, F. J., McFarland, R., Rabinovich, M., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296817750899 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationDuggan, E. W., Klopman, M. A., Berry, A. J., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2016) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-016-0720-z · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationSaur, N. M., Kongable, G. L., Holewinski, S., O’Brien, K., & Nasraway, S. A. (2013) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.003 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Perioperative Glucose Control in Neurosurgical Patients
Godoy, D. A., Napoli, M. D., Biestro, A., & Lenhardt, R. (2012) · Anesthesiology Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2012/690362 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Transitioning safely from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin
Kreider, K. E., & Lien, L. F. (2015) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-015-0595-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Glycemic Control during Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Lazar, H. L. (2012) · ISRN Cardiology · doi:10.5402/2012/292490 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Management of type 1 diabetes in the hospital setting
Mendez, C. E., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2017) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-017-0919-7 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationHospital management of hyperglycemia
Lleva, R. R., & Inzucchi, S. E. (2011) · Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity · doi:10.1097/med.0b013e3283447a6d · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Glucose Management Technologies for the Critically Ill
Salinas, P. D., & Mendez, C. E. (2019) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296818822838 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Tanenberg, R. J., Hardee, S., Rothermel, C., & Drake, A. J. (2017) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161402.or · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Rabinovich, M., Grahl, J., Durr, E. A., Gayed, R. M., Chester, K. W., McFarland, R., & McLean, B. A. (2017) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296817747617 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Technology in the management of diabetes in hospitalised adults
Thabit, H., & Schofield, J. D. (2024) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06206-4 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Ekanayake, P. S., Juang, P. S., & Kulasa, K. M. (2020) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-020-01364-2 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The Future is Now: Software-Guided Intensive Insulin Therapy in the Critically Ill
Rattan, R., & Nasraway, S. A. (2013) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681300700231 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Advances in the management of hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus during hospitalization
Idrees, T., Castro-Revoredo, I., Dhatariya, K., Hernandez, L., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2025) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-025-01157-1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationA Primer for Achieving Glycemic Control in the Cardiac Surgical Patient
McDonnell, M. E., Alexanian, S. M., White, L. H., & Lazar, H. L. (2012) · Journal of Cardiac Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2012.01471.x · Cited by 17 · see citing works
The effects of clinical decision support systems on insulin use: A systematic review
Jia, P., Jia, P., Chen, J., Zhao, P., & Zhang, M. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13291 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Evaluation of a Nurse-Managed Insulin Infusion Protocol
Passarelli, A., Gibbs, H. G., Rowden, A. M., Efird, L. E., Zink, E. K., & Mathioudakis, N. N. (2015) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2015.0046 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hughes, M. S., Pasquel, F. J., Davis, G. M., Lal, R., Buckingham, B. A., Boughton, C. K., Brown, S. A., & Bally, L. (2024) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2024.0343 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Improvement in Inpatient Glycemic Care: Pathways to Quality
Aloi, J., Mulla, C. M., Ullal, J., & Lieb, D. C. (2015) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-015-0587-4 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Kulasa, K. M., Serences, B., Nies, M., El-Kareh, R. E., Kurashige, K., & Box, K. W. (2020) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296820966616 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Hypoglycemia Prevention by Algorithm Design During Intravenous Insulin Infusion
Braithwaite, S. S., Clark, L., Idrees, T., Qureshi, F. M., & Soetan, O. T. (2018) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-018-0994-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Safety and Efficacy of Glucostabilizer in the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Groysman, A. Y., Peragallo‐Dittko, V., Islam, S., & Klek, S. P. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep-2019-0510 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Xu, B., Jiang, W., Wang, C.-Y., Weng, L., Hu, X.-Y., Peng, J., & Du, B. (2017) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.4103/0366-6999.213422 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Canbolat, Ö., Kapucu, S., & Kılıçkaya, O. (2019) · Critical Care Nurse · doi:10.4037/ccn2019431 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Faulds, E. R., Rayan, M. N., Mlachak, M. K., Dungan, K. M., Allen, T., & Patterson, E. S. (2026) · Diabetology · doi:10.3390/diabetology7010019 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Two Computerized Insulin Infusion Protocols
Lalani, B., Gosselin, K. P., Penno, R., Puryear, B., Rilo, H., & Lalani, A. (2023) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968231163584 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Coyne, P. J., Lyckholm, L., Bobb, B. T., Blaney-Brouse, D., Harrington, S. E., & Yanni, L. (2011) · Pain Management Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.005 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Glycemic control in critically ill surgical patients: risks and benefits
May, A. K., Mukherjee, K., Albaugh, V. L., Richards, J. E., & Rumbaugh, K. A. (2015) · Open Access Surgery · doi:10.2147/oas.s50416 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Crockett, S. E., Suarez-Cavelier, J. E., Accola, K., Hadas, L. A., Harnage, D. L., Garrett, P. R., Butler, K. A., & Mulla, Z. D. (2012) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep11337.or · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Mader, J. K., Motschnig, M., Theiler-Schwetz, V., Eibel-Reisz, K., Reisinger, A. C., Lackner, B., Augustin, T., Eller, P., & Mirth, C. (2019) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0082 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Updates on the Management of Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Adult Patients
Razavi, L., & Omoregie, C. (2023) · Endocrines · doi:10.3390/endocrines4030037 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Breeding, J., Welch, S. A., Buscher, H., Nair, P., Frost, C., Newman, S., & Whittam, S. (2014) · Australian Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2014.07.002 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Thomann, R., Schüetz, P., Müller, B., Thomke, S., Schoenenberger, R. A., & Keller, U. B. (2013) · Swiss Medical Weekly · doi:10.4414/smw.2013.13808 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Takahashi, Y., Matsuura, H., Domi, H., & Yamamura, H. (2022) · Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/s40842-022-00141-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Park, S. W., Lee, S., Cha, W. C., Hur, K. Y., Kim, J. H., Lee, M.-K., Park, S., & Jin, S. (2019) · Diabetes & Metabolism Journal · doi:10.4093/dmj.2018.0227 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Braithwaite, D. T., Umpierrez, G. E., & Braithwaite, S. S. (2014) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1260/2040-2295.5.1.23 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationMonge, F. J. C., Lareo, M. M., Gómez, S. G., Pérez, A. J., Varela, R. A., Herranz, C. Q., Rodríguez, G. M. R., & González, I. C. (2012) · Enfermería Intensiva · doi:10.1016/j.enfi.2011.12.005 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Colin, M. N., Octaviany, S. T., DARMAWAN, M., Anggi, J. F., Kusuma, C. F., & Kautsar, A. P. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02127-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in critically ill diabetic patients: current status and future prospects
Juneja, D., Gupta, A., & Singh, O. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology · doi:10.35712/aig.v3.i2.66 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Intensive insulin management of inpatient hyperglycemia: Where are we?
Molitch, M. E. (2010) · Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.1002/jhm.842 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Schiller, F. (2013) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hyperglycemia in the Intensive Care Unit
Lenhardt, R., & Akça, O. (2015) · Türk yoğun bakım derneği dergisi/Türk yoğun bakım dergisi · doi:10.4274/tybdd.03521 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hendrix, H., Velamuri, S. R., Sultan-Ali, I., Arif, F., Hickerson, W. L., & Hill, D. M. (2020) · Journal of Burn Care & Research · doi:10.1093/jbcr/iraa058 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bhat, A., Abdullah, A., Zaman, A., Hafeez, A. S., Faizan, M., Faisal, A. R., Asad, M., Ahmed, S. Z., Daniyal, S. M., Dhali, A., et al. (2026) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina62071287 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Adorable-Wagan, P., Paz-Pacheco, E. T., & Aligui, G. (2014) · Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · doi:10.15605/jafes.029.02.12 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Green, J. P., Adams, J. Y., Panacek, E. A., & Albertson, T. (2013) · Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports · doi:10.1007/s40138-013-0019-1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
One Hospital's Initiatives to Encourage Safe Opioid Use
Surprise, J. K., & Simpson, M. H. (2015) · Journal of Infusion Nursing · doi:10.1097/nan.0000000000000110 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Diabetes in the Critically Ill Patient: DKA, HHS, and Beyond
Singh, B., Chlebek, S., & Krikorian, A. (2023) · Contemporary Endocrinology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44648-1_5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Assessing outcomes of intravenous insulin therapy in non-intensive care patients
Gil, M. M., Fonseca, R., Tehrani, L., Castro, J. C., Meek, S., Thompson, B., & Cook, C. B. (2024) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.2024.2383556 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
High-dose insulin infusion in patients with COVID-19
Carpio, B. D., Trang, J., Vallejo, M., Nimeh, M., Lee, J., Rafferty, K. D., & Messler, J. (2021) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002415 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Effect of Computer-Assisted Glycemic Monitoring Protocol on Workload of Intensive Care Nurses
Canbolat, Ö., & Kapucu, S. (2021) · Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.31125/hunhemsire.1050387 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Recent Publications on Medications and Pharmacy
Russett, F. (2012) · Hospital Pharmacy · doi:10.1310/hpj4705-401
[Guidelines for the management of hyperglycaemia in hospitalised adult patients].
Gornik, I., Rahelić, D., Husedzinović, N., Gasparović, V., Ivanovic, D., Krznarić, Ž., & Pavlić-Renar, I. (2014) · PubMed
Leitgeb, S., & Mader, J. K. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816677296
SMJERNICE ZA ZBRINJAVANJE HIPERGLIKEMIJE U ODRASLIH HOSPITALIZIRANIH BOLESNIKA
Gornik, I., Rahelić, D., Husedžinović, I., Gašparović, V., Ivanovic, D., Krznarić, Ž., & Pavlić-Renar, I. (2014) · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)
In-hospital blood glucose regulation
Delfa, L., & Anthony, M. (2017)
Salinas, P. D., & Mendez, C. E. (2019) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296819841070
A Remarkably Inaccurate Comparison of Glucose Management Technologies
Rhinehart, A. S. (2019) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296819841074
Clark, L., Weeda, E. R., Griffin, M. L., Jones, L. A., & Haney, J. S. (2019) · Journal of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/0897190019867850
Computer-Guided Approaches to Inpatient Insulin Management
Ullal, J., & Aloi, J. (2023) · Contemporary Endocrinology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44648-1_9
Hospitalized Patient with Diabetes
Swift, C. S. (2026) · American Diabetes Association eBooks · doi:10.2337/9781580408493-ch12
Lalani, B., Penno, R., Bay, R. C., & Lalani, A. (2026) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968261467050
The Use of Diabetes Technology in the Inpatient Setting
Akcan, T., Faulds, E. R., Lal, R., Davis, G. M., Brown, S. A., Pasquel, F. J., & Hughes, M. S. (2026) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2026.08.016
Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in the Intensive Care Unit
Петровна, З. А., Madisi, N., & Gosmanov, A. R. (2026) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2026.09.005
- Authors
- Newton, C. A., Smiley, D., Bode, B. W., Kitabchi, A. E., Davidson, P. C., Jacobs, S., Steed, R. D., Stentz, F., Peng, L., Mulligan, P., Freire, A. X., Temponi, A., & Umpierrez, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Piedmont Atlanta Hospital (US)
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
- Venue
- Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 432-437
- ISSN
- 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-5606
- PMC
- PMC3733454
- OpenAlex
- W2172222386
- Semantic Scholar
- 570bb6544809c28d3060bf18cd4df50c8835ef38
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK074556, K08DK083036)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR00039, UL1RR025008, M01RR000039)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- continuous insulin infusion, glycemic control, glycemic targets, hypoglycemia, medical intensive care unit, critically ill patients
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Algorithms, Blood Glucose, Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-04.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-04.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review