The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aspirin plus Heparin or Aspirin Alone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin are prescribed for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, with the goal of improving the rate of live births, but limited data from randomized, controlled trials are available to support the use of these drugs. METHODS: In this randomized trial, we enrolled 364 women between the ages of 18 and 42 years who had a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriage and were attempting to conceive or were less than 6 weeks pregnant. We then randomly assigned them to receive daily 80 mg of aspirin plus open-label subcutaneous nadroparin (at a dose of 2850 IU, starting as soon as a viable pregnancy was demonstrated), 80 mg of aspirin alone, or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the live-birth rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of miscarriage, obstetrical complications, and maternal and fetal adverse events. RESULTS: Live-birth rates did not differ significantly among the three study groups. The proportions of women who gave birth to a live infant were 54.5% in the group receiving aspirin plus nadroparin (combination-therapy group), 50.8% in the aspirin-only group, and 57.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference in live-birth rate: combination therapy vs. placebo, -2.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.0 to 9.9; aspirin only vs. placebo, -6.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -18.8 to 6.4). Among 299 women who became pregnant, the live-birth rates were 69.1% in the combination-therapy group, 61.6% in the aspirin-only group, and 67.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference in live-birth rate: combination therapy vs. placebo, 2.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -10.8 to 15.0; aspirin alone vs. placebo -5.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -18.6 to 7.8). An increased tendency to bruise and swelling or itching at the injection site occurred significantly more frequently in the combination-therapy group than in the other two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neither aspirin combined with nadroparin nor aspirin alone improved the live-birth rate, as compared with placebo, among women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN58496168.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Badawy, A., Khiary, M., Sherif, L., Hassan, M. E., Ragab, A., & Abdelall, I. (2008) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1080/01443610802042688 · Cited by 108
RetractedInteraction revisited: the difference between two estimates.
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219 · Cited by 3,203
Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study
Andersen, A.-M. N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708 · Cited by 1,690
Rai, R., & Regan, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69204-0 · Cited by 1,227
Rai, R., Cohen, H., Dave, M., & Regan, L. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7076.253 · Cited by 1,113
Evidence-based guidelines for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage
Jauniaux, E. (2006) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/del150 · Cited by 520
Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage
Regan, L., & Rai, R. (2000) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1053/beog.2000.0123 · Cited by 512
Gnoth, C. (2003) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deg366 · Cited by 458
Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial of treatment
Farquharson, R. (2002) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02165-8 · Cited by 427
Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion.
Regan, L., Braude, P. R., & Trembath, P. L. (1989) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.299.6698.541 · Cited by 420
Cited by
VTE, Thrombophilia, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Pregnancy
Bates, S. M., Greer, I. A., Middeldorp, S., Veenstra, D. L., Prabulos, A.-M., & Vandvik, P. O. (2012) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2300 · Cited by 1,525
Self-citationRecurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives
El Hachem, H., Crepaux, V., May-Panloup, P., Descamps, P., Legendre, G., & Bouet, P.-E. (2017) · International Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s100817 · Cited by 462
de Jong, P. G., Kaandorp, S., Di Nisio, M., Goddijn, M., & Middeldorp, S. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004734.pub4 · Cited by 204
Self-citationGroom, K. M., & David, A. L. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.565 · Cited by 170
Toth, B., Würfel, W., Bohlmann, M., Zschocke, J., Rudnik-Schöneborn, S., Nawroth, F., Schleußner, E., Rogenhofer, N., Wischmann, T., von Wolff, M., et al. (2018) · Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/a-0586-4568 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaandorp, S. P., Goddijn, M., van der Post, J. A. M., Hutten, B. A., Verhoeve, H. R., Hamulyák, K., Mol, B. W., Folkeringa, N., Nahuis, M., Papatsonis, D. N. M., Büller, H. R., van der Veen, F., & Middeldorp, S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2010-04-29
- Volume
- 362
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1586-1596
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2104283275
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspirin plus Heparin or Aspirin Alone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1000641
- The paper
- Kaandorp, S. P., Goddijn, M., van der Post, J. A. M., Hutten, B. A., Verhoeve, H. R., Hamulyák, K., Mol, B. W., Folkeringa, N., Nahuis, M., Papatsonis, D. N. M., Büller, H. R., van der Veen, F., & Middeldorp, S. (2010). Aspirin plus Heparin or Aspirin Alone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1000641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.