Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aspirin plus Heparin or Aspirin Alone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage

Kaandorp, Stef P., Goddijn, Mariëtte, van der Post, Joris A.M., Hutten, Barbara A., Verhoeve, Harold R., Hamulyák, Karly, Mol, Ben Willem, Folkeringa, Nienke, Nahuis, Marleen, Papatsonis, Dimitri N.M., Büller, Harry R., van der Veen, Fulco, Middeldorp, Saskia·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin are prescribed for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, with the goal of improving the rate of live births, but limited data from randomized, controlled trials are available to support the use of these drugs. METHODS: In this randomized trial, we enrolled 364 women between the ages of 18 and 42 years who had a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriage and were attempting to conceive or were less than 6 weeks pregnant. We then randomly assigned them to receive daily 80 mg of aspirin plus open-label subcutaneous nadroparin (at a dose of 2850 IU, starting as soon as a viable pregnancy was demonstrated), 80 mg of aspirin alone, or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the live-birth rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of miscarriage, obstetrical complications, and maternal and fetal adverse events. RESULTS: Live-birth rates did not differ significantly among the three study groups. The proportions of women who gave birth to a live infant were 54.5% in the group receiving aspirin plus nadroparin (combination-therapy group), 50.8% in the aspirin-only group, and 57.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference in live-birth rate: combination therapy vs. placebo, -2.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.0 to 9.9; aspirin only vs. placebo, -6.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -18.8 to 6.4). Among 299 women who became pregnant, the live-birth rates were 69.1% in the combination-therapy group, 61.6% in the aspirin-only group, and 67.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference in live-birth rate: combination therapy vs. placebo, 2.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -10.8 to 15.0; aspirin alone vs. placebo -5.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -18.6 to 7.8). An increased tendency to bruise and swelling or itching at the injection site occurred significantly more frequently in the combination-therapy group than in the other two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neither aspirin combined with nadroparin nor aspirin alone improved the live-birth rate, as compared with placebo, among women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN58496168.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1000641

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Kaandorp, S. P., Goddijn, M., van der Post, J. A. M., Hutten, B. A., Verhoeve, H. R., Hamulyák, K., Mol, B. W., Folkeringa, N., Nahuis, M., Papatsonis, D. N. M., Büller, H. R., van der Veen, F., & Middeldorp, S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-04-29
Volume
362
Issue
17
Pages
1586-1596
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2104283275
Cited by
450
References
31
FWCI
16.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspirin plus Heparin or Aspirin Alone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1000641
The paper
Kaandorp, S. P., Goddijn, M., van der Post, J. A. M., Hutten, B. A., Verhoeve, H. R., Hamulyák, K., Mol, B. W., Folkeringa, N., Nahuis, M., Papatsonis, D. N. M., Büller, H. R., van der Veen, F., & Middeldorp, S. (2010). Aspirin plus Heparin or Aspirin Alone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriage. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1000641

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.