Cited by 614Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Permissive underfeeding or standard enteral feeding in critically ill adults

Open access
Arabi, Yaseen M., Aldawood, Abdulaziz S., Haddad, Samir H., Al-Dorzi, Hasan M., Tamim, Hani M., Jones, Gwynne, Mehta, Sangeeta, McIntyre, Lauralyn +4 more·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The appropriate caloric goal for critically ill adults is unclear. We evaluated the effect of restriction of nonprotein calories (permissive underfeeding), as compared with standard enteral feeding, on 90-day mortality among critically ill adults, with maintenance of the full recommended amount of protein in both groups. METHODS: At seven centers, we randomly assigned 894 critically ill adults with a medical, surgical, or trauma admission category to permissive underfeeding (40 to 60% of calculated caloric requirements) or standard enteral feeding (70 to 100%) for up to 14 days while maintaining a similar protein intake in the two groups. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups; 96.8% of the patients were receiving mechanical ventilation. During the intervention period, the permissive-underfeeding group received fewer mean (±SD) calories than did the standard-feeding group (835±297 kcal per day vs. 1299±467 kcal per day, P<0.001; 46±14% vs. 71±22% of caloric requirements, P<0.001). Protein intake was similar in the two groups (57±24 g per day and 59±25 g per day, respectively; P=0.29). The 90-day mortality was similar: 121 of 445 patients (27.2%) in the permissive-underfeeding group and 127 of 440 patients (28.9%) in the standard-feeding group died (relative risk with permissive underfeeding, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.16; P=0.58). No serious adverse events were reported; there were no significant between-group differences with respect to feeding intolerance, diarrhea, infections acquired in the intensive care unit (ICU), or ICU or hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral feeding to deliver a moderate amount of nonprotein calories to critically ill adults was not associated with lower mortality than that associated with planned delivery of a full amount of nonprotein calories. (Funded by the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; PermiT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN68144998.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1502826

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [7]7. Heyland DK, Cahill N, Day AG. Opti- mal amount of calories for critically ill patients: depends on how you slice the cake! Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 2619-26.
  2. [8]8. Martin CM, Doig GS, Heyland DK, Mor- rison T, Sibbald WJ. Multicentre, cluster- randomized clinical trial of algorithms for critical-care enteral and parenteral therapy (ACCEPT). CMAJ 2004; 170: 197-204.
  3. [14]14. Heilbronn LK, Ravussin E. Calorie re- striction and aging: review of the litera- ture and implications for studies in hu- mans. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 78: 361-9.
  4. [20]20. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, et al. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307: 795-803.
  5. [22]22. Singer P, Hiesmayr M, Biolo G, et al. Pragmatic approach to nutrition in the ICU: expert opinion regarding which calorie pro- tein target. Clin Nutr 2014; 33: 246-51.
  6. [28]28. Walker RN, Heuberger RA. Predictive equations for energy needs for the criti- cally ill. Respir Care 2009; 54: 509-21.
  7. [30]30. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-29.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arabi, Y. M., Aldawood, A. S., Haddad, S. H., Al-Dorzi, H. M., Tamim, H. M., Jones, G., Mehta, S., McIntyre, L., Solaiman, O., Sakkijha, M. H., Sadat, M., & Afesh, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-06-18
Volume
372
Issue
25
Pages
2398-2408
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4251465341
Cited by
614
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 18
FWCI
62.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
permissive underfeeding, enteral nutrition, critically ill adults, 90-day mortality, protein intake, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit, feeding intolerance, length of hospital stay
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Energy Intake, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Requirements, Proteins, Respiration, Artificial, Critical Illness, Caloric Restriction, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review