Cited by 308Reproductive Health and TechnologiesOvarian function and disordersAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Randomized trial of a lifestyle program in obese infertile women

Open access
Mutsaerts, Meike A.Q., van Oers, Anne M., Groen, Henk, Burggraaff, Jan M., Kuchenbecker, Walter K.H., Perquin, Denise A.M., Koks, Carolien A.M., van Golde, Ron +23 more·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small lifestyle-intervention studies suggest that modest weight loss increases the chance of conception and may improve perinatal outcomes, but large randomized, controlled trials are lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned infertile women with a body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 29 or higher to a 6-month lifestyle intervention preceding treatment for infertility or to prompt treatment for infertility. The primary outcome was the vaginal birth of a healthy singleton at term within 24 months after randomization. RESULTS: We assigned women who did not conceive naturally to one of two treatment strategies: 290 women were assigned to a 6-month lifestyle-intervention program preceding 18 months of infertility treatment (intervention group) and 287 were assigned to prompt infertility treatment for 24 months (control group). A total of 3 women withdrew consent, so 289 women in the intervention group and 285 women in the control group were included in the analysis. The discontinuation rate in the intervention group was 21.8%. In intention-to-treat analyses, the mean weight loss was 4.4 kg in the intervention group and 1.1 kg in the control group (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 27.1% of the women in the intervention group and 35.2% of those in the control group (rate ratio in the intervention group, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In obese infertile women, a lifestyle intervention preceding infertility treatment, as compared with prompt infertility treatment, did not result in higher rates of a vaginal birth of a healthy singleton at term within 24 months after randomization. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR1530.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1505297

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, only three of which reported on live birth or ongoing pregnancy (Belan 2019, Mutsaerts 2016, Rossi 2013), and one provided data on live birth on request (Oostingh 2020).

    “Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, only three of which reported on live birth or ongoing pregnancy (Belan 2019, Mutsaerts 2016, Rossi 2013), and one provided data on live birth on request (Oostingh 2020).”

    From Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility (2021) · cites this paper as Mutsaerts 2016

  • The predefined safety outcomes (adverse events and miscarriage) were reported in only one study (Mutsaerts 2016).

    “The predefined safety outcomes (adverse events and miscarriage) were reported in only one study (Mutsaerts 2016).”

    From Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility (2021) · cites this paper as Mutsaerts 2016

  • In Mutsaerts 2016, at 6 months, sugary drink consumption was lower in the experimental group than control, with a mean difference of -0.41 (95% CI -0.47 to -0.34).

    “Mutsaerts 2016 Sugary drinks in glasses/d at 6 months (mean ± SD) 0.59 ± 0.2 glasses/d in experimental group (n = 88) 0.99 ± 0.3 glasses/d in control group (n = 128) MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.34”

    From Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility (2021) · cites this paper as Mutsaerts 2016

  • In Mutsaerts 2016, at 6 months, savoury snack consumption was lower in the experimental group than control, with a mean difference of -0.15 (95% CI -0.35 to 0.05).

    “Savoury snacks in handfuls/week at 6 months (mean ± SD) 2.17 ± 0.73 handfuls/week in experimental group (n = 100) 2.32 ± 0.81 handfuls/week in control group (n = 139) MD -0.15, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.05”

    From Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility (2021) · cites this paper as Mutsaerts 2016

  • In Mutsaerts 2016, at 6 months, sweet snack consumption was lower in the experimental group than control, with a mean difference of -1 (95% CI -1.14 to -0.85).

    “Sweet snacks in portions/week at 6 months (mean ± SD) 1.725 ± 0.32 portion/week in experimental group (n = 99) 2.72 ± 0.79 portion/week in control group (n = 136) MD -1, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.85”

    From Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility (2021) · cites this paper as Mutsaerts 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Table 2. Pregnancy Outcomes within 24 Months after Randomization, According to Trial Group.* The New England Journal of Medicine is produced by NEJM Group, a division of the Massachusetts Medical Society. .
  2. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Obe- sity and reproduction: a committee opin- ion. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 1116-26.
  3. National Institute for Clinical Excel- lence. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. London: RCOG Press, 2004.
  4. ter Bogt NC, Bemelmans WJ, Beltman FW, Broer J, Smit AJ, van der Meer K. Pre- venting weight gain: one-year results of a randomized lifestyle intervention. Am J Prev Med 2009; 37: 270-7.
  5. Visser GH, Eilers PH, Elferink-Stink- ens PM, Merkus HM, Wit JM. New Dutch The New England Journal of Medicine is produced by NEJM Group, a division of the Massachusetts Medical Society. .
  6. Copyright © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. n engl j med 374;20 nejm.org May 19, 2016 1953 Lifestyle Progr am in Obese Infertile Women reference curves for birthweight by gesta- tional age. Early Hum Dev 2009; 85: 737-44.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutsaerts, M. A. Q., van Oers, A. M., Groen, H., Burggraaff, J. M., Kuchenbecker, W. K. H., Perquin, D. A. M., Koks, C. A. M., van Golde, R., Kaaijk, E. M., Schierbeek, J. M., Oosterhuis, G. J. E., Broekmans, F. J., Bemelmans, W. J. E., Lambalk, C. B., Verberg, M. F. G., van der Veen, F., Klijn, N. F., Mercelina, P. E. A. M., van Kasteren, Y. M., Nap, A. W., Brinkhuis, E. A., Vogel, N. E. A., Mulder, R. J. A. B., Gondrie, E. T. C. M., de Bruin, J. P., Sikkema, J. M., de Greef, M. H. G., ter Bogt, N. C. W., Land, J. A., Mol, B. W. J., & Hoek, A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (M.A.Q.M., A.M.O., J.A.L., A.H.), General Practice (M.A.Q.M.), and Epidemiology (H.G.), and the Institute of Human Movement Sciences (M.H.G.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Martini Hospital (N.E.A.V.), and the Research and Innovation Group in Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences (M.H.G.G.), Groningen, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Scheper...
  • Leiden University (NL)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-05-19
Volume
374
Issue
20
Pages
1942-1953
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2404662288
Cited by
308
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
45.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
obesity, female infertility, lifestyle intervention, weight loss, infertility treatment, vaginal delivery, singleton births, perinatal outcomes, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Rate, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Life Style, Obesity, Pregnancy, Weight Loss, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Young Adult, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review