Cited by 100Reproductive Health and TechnologiesOvarian function and disordersObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Dropout is a problem in lifestyle intervention programs for overweight and obese infertile women: A systematic review

Open access
Mutsaerts, M.A.Q., Kuchenbecker, W.K.H., Mol, B.W., Land, J.A., Hoek, A.·2013·Human Reproduction

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What are the dropout rates in lifestyle intervention programs (LIPs) for overweight and obese infertile women and can intervention- or patient-related baseline factors associated with dropout be identified in these women? SUMMARY ANSWER: The median dropout rate was 24% in overweight and obese infertile women who participated in a LIP; clinical useful intervention or patient-related factors associated with dropout could not be identified. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Overweight and obese infertile women might improve their chance of conception when they improve their lifestyle and lose weight. Dropout from LIPs reduces the chance of losing considerable weight and is therefore considered to be an important limiting factor of the success of LIPs. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This systematic review included 15 studies published between January 1980 and December 2012. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The included studies investigated the effect of LIPs for overweight and obese infertile women with infertility. From these studies, dropout rates and intervention- and patient-related baseline factors associated with dropout, as well as weight loss and pregnancy rates, were recorded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 15 studies identified, of which 10 reported dropout rates. The median dropout rate was 24% (range: 0-31%). Four studies reported baseline characteristics of women who dropped out, but modifiable predictors of dropout could not be identified. Weight loss and pregnancy rates were lower in women who dropped out than in women who completed the LIPs. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There were limited numbers of studies investigating patient-related factors associated with dropout. The heterogeneity in the studies precluded us from drawing firm conclusions on the relation between the type of intervention and dropout. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Dropout from LIPs is a major drawback because it predisposes to less weight loss and lower pregnancy rates. Identification of predictors of dropout is needed to identify overweight and obese infertile women who are prone for dropout. These women might benefit from extra support and monitoring, to potentially increasing adherence rates, weight loss and pregnancy chances. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): M.A.Q.M. was supported by a research grant from the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). The department of obstetrics and gynaecology received research grants from Merck Sharpe and Dohme BV, feering pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, the Netherlands.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/det026

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review of dropout rates in women with infertility, overweight and obesity reported a median dropout rate of 24%.

    “A systematic review of dropout rates in women with infertility, overweight and obesity reported a median dropout rate of 24% (Mutsaerts et al., 2013).”
  • Study duration, especially longer lasting lifestyle intervention programmes, seems to be a factor that negatively contributes to compliance; however, other participant-related factors that predict dropout at baseline have not yet been identified.

    “Study duration, especially longer lasting lifestyle intervention programmes, seems to be a factor that negatively contributes to compliance; however, other participantrelated factors that predict dropout at baseline have not yet been identified (Mutsaerts et al., 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Inelmen EM, Toffanello ED, Enzi G, Gasparini G, Miotto F, Sergi G, Busetto L. Predictors of dropout in overweight and obese outpatients . Int J Obes 2005; 29 :122-128.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutsaerts, M. A. Q., Kuchenbecker, W. K. H., Mol, B. W., Land, J. A., & Hoek, A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Isala (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Mutsaerts, M.A.Q.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2013-02-20
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
979-986
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2160890483
Cited by
100
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw (50‐50110‐96‐518)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
dropout, lifestyle intervention, overweight, obesity, female infertility, weight loss, pregnancy rate, predictors of dropout, intervention adherence, predictors of treatment response, weight gain during pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Weight Loss, Pregnancy Rate, Overweight, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review